Learn page svgs updated

content/blog/avoiding-burnout-sustainability-in-the-ruins.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "avoiding-burnout-sustainability-in-the-ruins-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "avoiding-burnout-sustainability-in-the-ruins-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#EDCC8F"
+  color: "#FFE8DC"
 ---
 
 The pattern repeats itself across every worker coop, mutual aid network, and organizing project. Someone who was essential suddenly stops showing up. They apologize, say they need to step back, talk about self-care and boundaries. Everyone nods sympathetically. The work gets redistributed to whoever's left. Six months later, someone else burns out. The cycle continues.

content/blog/digital-mediation-and-the-death-of-nuance.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "digital-mediation-and-the-death-of-nuance-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "digital-mediation-and-the-death-of-nuance-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#E2EFFF"
+  color: "#FFF1D4"
 ---
 
 This isn't neutral. The medium shapes the message, and algorithmic mediation shapes how we relate to each other in ways that actively undermine the solidarity we're trying to build.

content/blog/how-chaos-concentrates-control.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "how-chaos-concentrates-control-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "how-chaos-concentrates-control-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#C8E6F0"
+  color: "#DCF7FC"
 ---
 
 Every failing collective tells itself the same story: we don't need formal structures because we trust each other. We're not like those hierarchical organizations. We make decisions organically, by consensus, through the natural flow of discussion. We don't have leaders.

content/blog/integrating-new-members-without-dilution.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "integrating-new-members-without-dilution-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "integrating-new-members-without-dilution-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#F5D4C8"
+  color: "#FBDDF0"
 ---
 
 Your worker coop is finally stable. Your mutual aid group actually delivers. Your open source project has momentum. People show up, work gets done, meetings function. You've built something that works, which means people want to join. That's where the problem starts.

content/blog/knowledge-management-and-institutional-amnesia.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "knowledge-management-and-institutional-amnesia-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "knowledge-management-and-institutional-amnesia-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#D4F0E0"
+  color: "#F1FBE0"
 ---
 
 Someone leaves the group and takes three years of operational knowledge with them. Not because they're selfish, but because that knowledge lived in their head and in message threads that have already disappeared. The new person trying to figure out how intake works has to reconstruct the process from fragments and half-remembered explanations. Six months later, someone else leaves and the cycle repeats.

content/blog/making-decisions-without-hierarchy.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "making-decisions-without-hierarchy-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "making-decisions-without-hierarchy-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#E8D4F4"
+  color: "#F3F3F1"
 ---
 
 Many groups try to work without bosses, managers, or traditional leadership structures. But when no one's in charge, how do decisions actually get made? Non-hierarchical groups often rely on collective processes that prioritize trust, transparency, and shared responsibility. These approaches can take more time upfront, but they help build stronger, more equitable communities in the long run.

content/blog/operational-security-mutual-aid.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ thumbnail:
   vertical: "operational-security-mutual-aid-vertical.svg"
   horizontal: "operational-security-mutual-aid-horizontal.svg"
 background:
-  color: "#F4F3F1"
+  color: "#EECB8F"
 ---
 
 We like to think of mutual aid as something pure, outside the machinery of state surveillance and corporate extraction. But the reality is messier. The moment you start organizing, you're generating data. Names, addresses, health conditions, immigration status, financial need. All of it stored somewhere, passed between people, vulnerable to exactly the kind of scrutiny that could harm the people you're trying to help.