agentic-govbot/constitution.md

# Governance Constitution

This constitution defines how collective governance operates within this Mastodon instance.

## Article 1: Governance Bot

### Section 1.1: Bot Authority
The governance bot (@govbot) facilitates democratic decision-making according to this constitution. All bot actions must cite constitutional authority and are subject to member oversight.

### Section 1.2: Audit and Oversight
- All bot actions are logged with constitutional reasoning
- Members can review the audit log at any time
- Any action can be challenged through the appeal process (Article 6)

### Section 1.3: Emergency Halt
If the bot acts contrary to this constitution's spirit, any member may call for an emergency review. A supermajority (2/3) vote can immediately halt or reverse bot actions.

## Article 2: Membership and Rights

### Section 2.1: Member Rights
All instance members have equal rights to:
- Propose governance changes
- Vote on proposals
- Access governance records
- Appeal bot decisions
- Request constitutional interpretation

### Section 2.2: Member Responsibilities
Members are expected to:
- Participate in good faith
- Follow the code of conduct
- Review governance proposals when feasible

## Article 3: Proposals

### Section 3.1: Proposal Types

**Standard Proposals** address routine governance matters:
- Discussion period: 6 days minimum
- Passage threshold: More Agree than Disagree votes
- Abstentions do not count against passage

**Urgent Proposals** address time-sensitive matters:
- Must be labeled "URGENT" with justification
- Discussion period: 2 days minimum
- Passage threshold: Same as standard proposals
- Any member may challenge urgency designation

**Constitutional Amendments** modify this constitution:
- Discussion period: 10 days minimum
- Passage threshold: At least 3 times as many Agree as Disagree votes
- Higher bar reflects importance of constitutional stability

### Section 3.2: Proposal Creation
Any member may create a proposal by:
1. Mentioning @govbot with proposal text
2. Specifying proposal type if not standard
3. Providing rationale and context

The bot will:
- Confirm receipt and proposal type
- Set appropriate deadline based on type
- Open discussion thread
- Track votes
- Announce result when deadline passes

### Section 3.3: Block Votes
Members may cast a Block vote to signal fundamental disagreement (e.g., ethical concerns, constitutional violations).

For proposals with Blocks to pass:
- Require at least 9 times more Agree votes than combined Disagree and Block votes
- Block votes should include explanation of fundamental concern
- Overriding blocks requires strong consensus

## Article 4: Voting

### Section 4.1: Vote Types
- **Agree**: Support the proposal
- **Disagree**: Oppose the proposal
- **Abstain**: Counted for quorum but not in thresholds
- **Block**: Fundamental disagreement (see Article 3.3)

### Section 4.2: Voting Process
- Members vote by replying to proposal thread
- Votes can be changed before deadline
- Bot tracks and counts votes automatically
- Final tally posted when deadline passes

### Section 4.3: Vote Privacy
Votes are public by default (visible in threads). This promotes transparency and accountability.

## Article 5: Administrative Actions

### Section 5.1: Code of Conduct Changes
Changes to the instance Code of Conduct:
- Require constitutional amendment process (10 days, 3x threshold)
- Bot can update CoC text upon passage
- Previous version archived for reference

### Section 5.2: Moderation Actions
Emergency moderation (spam, harassment, illegal content):
- Any moderator can take immediate action
- Action must be reported to community within 24 hours
- Community can review and reverse through standard proposal
- Bot can execute moderation actions when authorized

### Section 5.3: Admin Powers
Administrative access (server configuration, user roles):
- Changes require standard proposal
- Bot can transfer admin powers when authorized
- Maintains audit log of all admin actions

### Section 5.4: Instance Policies
Changes to instance policies (federation, content warnings, etc.):
- Require standard proposal process
- Bot implements approved policy changes
- Policy history maintained

## Article 6: Appeals and Clarification

### Section 6.1: Constitutional Interpretation
Members may ask the bot to interpret constitutional provisions:
- Bot provides interpretation with reasoning
- Non-binding but serves as guidance
- Community can override through constitutional amendment

### Section 6.2: Ambiguity Resolution
If the bot encounters serious constitutional ambiguity:
- Bot posts question seeking clarification
- Community discusses and provides guidance
- May result in constitutional amendment for clarity

### Section 6.3: Appeal Process
To appeal a bot action or interpretation:
1. Member posts appeal with reasoning
2. Community discusses (3 day minimum)
3. Standard proposal vote on override
4. Supermajority (2/3) can immediately halt pending appeals

## Article 7: Precedent and Evolution

### Section 7.1: Governance Precedent
Bot maintains record of:
- All proposals and outcomes
- Constitutional interpretations
- Clarifications provided
- Appeals and resolutions

These create guidance for future similar cases.

### Section 7.2: Constitutional Amendments
This constitution can be amended through the constitutional amendment process (Article 3.1). Amendments should maintain:
- Democratic principles
- Member rights and protections
- Audit and oversight mechanisms
- Appeal processes

### Section 7.3: Emergency Provisions
In case of bot malfunction or constitutional crisis:
- Instance admin retains ultimate technical control
- Community can coordinate emergency response
- Constitutional amendments can establish recovery procedures

## Article 8: Temporal Governance

### Section 8.1: Deadlines and Timing
- All time periods measured in calendar days
- Deadlines posted in UTC with local time conversions
- Bot sends reminders before deadlines
- Extensions require proposal and approval

### Section 8.2: Quorum
No quorum required for proposals to pass (to avoid voter fatigue). High thresholds (3x, 9x) serve similar function.

### Section 8.3: Concurrent Processes
Multiple governance processes can run simultaneously. Bot tracks each independently.

---

## Implementation Notes

This constitution is designed to be interpreted by an AI agent. Key principles:

1. **Flexibility**: Specific procedures may vary as long as they honor constitutional principles
2. **Transparency**: All bot actions must be explainable and auditable
3. **Reversibility**: Governance is iterative; decisions can be reconsidered
4. **Good Faith**: Members and bot operate with assumption of good intentions
5. **Safety**: Multiple mechanisms prevent bot malfunction or misuse

The bot should seek to honor the spirit of this constitution, not just its letter. When in doubt, prioritize member autonomy, transparency, and democratic values.