Files
agentic-govbot/templates/dispute-resolution/transformative-justice.md
Nathan Schneider bda868cb45 Implement LLM-driven governance architecture with structured memory
This commit completes the transition to a pure LLM-driven agentic
governance system with no hard-coded governance logic.

Core Architecture Changes:
- Add structured memory system (memory.py) for tracking governance processes
- Add LLM tools (tools.py) for deterministic operations (math, dates, random)
- Add audit trail system (audit.py) for human-readable decision explanations
- Add LLM-driven agent (agent_refactored.py) that interprets constitution

Documentation:
- Add ARCHITECTURE.md describing process-centric design
- Add ARCHITECTURE_EXAMPLE.md with complete workflow walkthrough
- Update README.md to reflect current LLM-driven architecture
- Simplify constitution.md to benevolent dictator model for testing

Templates:
- Add 8 governance templates (petition, consensus, do-ocracy, jury, etc.)
- Add 8 dispute resolution templates
- All templates work with generic process-based architecture

Key Design Principles:
- "Process" is central abstraction (not "proposal")
- No hard-coded process types or thresholds
- LLM interprets constitution to understand governance rules
- Tools ensure correctness for calculations
- Complete auditability with reasoning and citations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-08 14:24:23 -07:00

354 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Transformative Justice Dispute Resolution
*A process addressing immediate harm while transforming conditions that enabled it*
This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.
---
## Article: Dispute Resolution
### Section 1: Principles and Values
**Core Values**
This community operates on seven transformative justice principles:
1. **Liberation** - Building a world where all can thrive
2. **Accountability without punishment** - Responsibility without state violence
3. **Safety and support** - For all involved, especially most impacted
4. **Collective action** - Community involvement, not isolation
5. **Addressing root causes** - Changing conditions that enabled harm
6. **Faith in transformation** - People's capacity to change and heal
7. **Sustainability** - Long-term commitment to change
**Transformative Approach**
We address not just individual incidents but:
- Patterns of behavior
- Power dynamics at play
- Structural and systemic factors
- Community conditions that enable harm
- Long-term cultural change
**Community Standards**
- Documentation in accessible formats
- Multiple languages if needed
- Regular workshops on values and practices
- Living document that evolves
- Bot maintains current materials
### Section 2: Initiating the Process
**Multiple Entry Points**
Process can be initiated via:
- Secure online form
- Phone hotline
- Direct conversation with trained member
- Through support person or ally
- Anonymous reporting option
**Initial Assessment**
Within 48 hours:
- Initial safety assessment
- Identify immediate needs
- Determine process appropriateness
- Form facilitation team
- Begin gathering support
**Who Can Initiate**
Process can be started by:
- Person directly harmed
- Witnesses to harm
- Community members concerned about patterns
- Person who caused harm seeking accountability
- Support people acting on behalf of others
### Section 3: Support Teams and Facilitation
**Facilitation Teams**
Teams of 2-3 trained members:
- Guide overall process
- Coordinate different components
- Hold complexity and multiple timelines
- Connect to resources
- Maintain process integrity
**Support Teams for All Parties**
Each person involved has support team:
- Person harmed: support, advocacy, healing resources
- Person who caused harm: accountability support, transformation work
- Community members: processing impact, staying engaged
- Support teams meet separately and coordinate
**Trauma-Informed Practice**
All facilitators trained in:
- Recognizing trauma responses
- Creating safety
- Preventing re-traumatization
- Cultural competency
- Power analysis
- Self-care and sustainability
### Section 4: Communication Norms and Ground Rules
**Process Agreements**
Participants commit to:
- Using "I" statements about personal experience
- Active listening without interruption
- Acknowledging systemic factors alongside individual actions
- Respecting different paces of healing
- Maintaining confidentiality with specified exceptions
- Supporting long-term transformation
**Safety Protocols**
Process includes:
- Safety planning with those harmed
- Boundaries around contact between parties
- Emergency contacts and backup plans
- Clear escalation procedures
- Regular safety check-ins
- Willingness to pause or modify process
### Section 5: Assessment and Analysis
**Multi-Level Analysis**
Comprehensive assessment examines:
- **Individual harm** - Specific impact on those harmed
- **Behavioral patterns** - History and context of actions
- **Relationship dynamics** - Power imbalances and history
- **Community factors** - Cultural norms enabling harm
- **Structural factors** - Systemic oppression and inequality
**Understanding Root Causes**
Exploring questions like:
- What conditions made this harm possible?
- What systems of oppression are at play?
- What community norms need transformation?
- What resources or education were missing?
- How do we prevent future harm?
**Scope and Appropriateness**
Most appropriate for:
- Community-based interventions
- Addressing root causes
- Pattern behavior requiring transformation
- Situations where state intervention would cause more harm
- Building community capacity for accountability
**When State Systems Needed**
Acknowledge that sometimes:
- Immediate safety requires outside intervention
- Survivors choose to involve authorities
- Legal processes run parallel to community process
- TJ complements rather than replaces
### Section 6: Voluntary Participation
**Consent-Based Process**
Participation is voluntary:
- Those harmed decide their involvement level
- Person who caused harm encouraged but not forced
- Community members choose engagement
- Can pause or leave at any time
- Different participation levels available
**When Someone Declines**
Process may continue focusing on:
- Support for those harmed
- Community education and prevention
- Systemic changes to prevent future harm
- Transformation work with willing participants
- Community accountability even without direct participation
### Section 7: Deliberation Process
**Multiple Formats**
Process uses various formats:
- Large group dialogue sessions
- One-on-one conversations
- Small group discussions
- Writing and reflection
- Artistic expression
- Action and practice
**Trauma-Informed Pacing**
- Respects different healing timelines
- Allows breaks and pauses
- No rushing toward resolution
- Honors that transformation takes time
- Regular check-ins on pacing
**Participants**
May include:
- Core participants (harmed, harm-doer)
- Support people for all parties
- Facilitation team members
- Community stakeholders
- Witnesses and those impacted
- Content experts (when needed)
### Section 8: Solution-Building
**Structured Brainstorming**
Through facilitated process, identify solutions at multiple levels:
- **Individual healing** - What does person harmed need?
- **Individual accountability** - What work must harm-doer do?
- **Relationship repair** - Can/should relationship be rebuilt?
- **Community education** - What does community need to learn?
- **Systemic change** - What structures need transformation?
**Addressing Multiple Levels**
Effective transformative justice includes:
- Immediate safety and support
- Personal transformation work
- Relationship healing (if possible/desired)
- Community education and awareness
- Policy and practice changes
- Cultural shift in community norms
### Section 9: Decision-Making and Agreements
**Consensus-Based**
Decisions prioritize those most impacted:
- Person harmed has most weight
- Others consent to support plans
- Creative, multi-faceted agreements
- Flexible and revisable over time
**Types of Commitments**
Agreements often include:
*For person who caused harm:*
- Education and learning (workshops, reading, mentorship)
- Therapy or counseling
- Behavioral changes with accountability
- Restitution or repair actions
- Community service
- Regular check-ins with accountability team
*For community:*
- Policy changes
- Educational programming
- Resource allocation
- Cultural norm shifting
- Support structures for prevention
*For those harmed:*
- Healing resources and support
- Safety measures
- Decision-making power over process
- Community accountability to their needs
### Section 10: Implementation and Accountability
**Long-Term Commitment**
Transformation requires time:
- Process may span months or years
- Regular check-ins and adjustments
- Sustained community engagement
- Resources for long-term support
- Celebrating progress while maintaining accountability
**Accountability Structures**
Include:
- Regular reporting to accountability team
- Observable behavioral changes
- Community witness and support
- Consequences for non-compliance (decided by those harmed)
- Repair of trust over time
**When Commitments Aren't Met**
If person doesn't follow through:
- Facilitation team addresses with person
- Support team explores barriers
- May adjust expectations or timeline
- Those harmed decide on consequences
- May include separation from community
### Section 11: Extending Timeline and Process Evolution
**Flexible Timeline**
Process adapts as needed:
- May extend timeline for transformation work
- Can bring in additional expertise
- Might adapt focus while maintaining goals
- Responds to changing circumstances
- Honors that healing isn't linear
**Specialist Support**
May bring in specialists for:
- Trauma counseling
- Addiction support
- Mental health expertise
- Cultural or language support
- Legal advice
- Youth or elder-specific support
### Section 12: Reconsideration and Follow-Up
**Structured Reassessment**
Process revisited when:
- Agreements not being implemented
- New information emerges about harm
- Harm recurs or patterns continue
- More support needed
- Ready for next phase of work
**Follow-Up Process**
Includes:
- Review of original agreements
- Assessment of what's working
- Identification of implementation gaps
- Adjustment of expectations or support
- Recognition of growth and change
- Planning next phases
### Section 13: Information Sharing and Privacy
**Consent-Based Sharing**
Information shared based on:
- Explicit consent of those involved
- Need for safety of community
- Supporting accountability
- Educational value for community
- Always protecting most impacted
**Community Learning**
While protecting individuals:
- Pattern-level data shared for prevention
- Educational materials developed from learnings
- Community workshops on prevention
- De-identified case studies (with consent)
- Building community capacity
**Record Keeping**
Bot maintains:
- Process timeline and phases
- Agreements and commitments
- Check-in schedules
- Accountability tracking
- Resources and referrals
- Consent documentation
---
## Implementation Notes for Bot
When supporting transformative justice process:
1. **Hold complexity** - Multiple timelines, participants, and goals
2. **Center most impacted** - Prioritize needs of those harmed
3. **Track accountability** - Support long-term commitment tracking
4. **Respect consent** - All information sharing requires permission
5. **Support facilitation** - Coordinate logistics for complex process
6. **Connect resources** - Link to community support and expertise
7. **Long-term view** - Transformation takes time, support sustained engagement
8. **Learn and adapt** - Use patterns to prevent future harm
This process works best when:
- Community committed to root cause transformation
- Resources available for long-term support
- Skilled facilitation teams in place
- Analysis of systems of oppression included
- Focus on liberation, not just resolution
- Community willing to change itself
- State alternatives needed/desired