Files
agentic-govbot/templates/dispute-resolution/transformative-justice.md
Nathan Schneider bda868cb45 Implement LLM-driven governance architecture with structured memory
This commit completes the transition to a pure LLM-driven agentic
governance system with no hard-coded governance logic.

Core Architecture Changes:
- Add structured memory system (memory.py) for tracking governance processes
- Add LLM tools (tools.py) for deterministic operations (math, dates, random)
- Add audit trail system (audit.py) for human-readable decision explanations
- Add LLM-driven agent (agent_refactored.py) that interprets constitution

Documentation:
- Add ARCHITECTURE.md describing process-centric design
- Add ARCHITECTURE_EXAMPLE.md with complete workflow walkthrough
- Update README.md to reflect current LLM-driven architecture
- Simplify constitution.md to benevolent dictator model for testing

Templates:
- Add 8 governance templates (petition, consensus, do-ocracy, jury, etc.)
- Add 8 dispute resolution templates
- All templates work with generic process-based architecture

Key Design Principles:
- "Process" is central abstraction (not "proposal")
- No hard-coded process types or thresholds
- LLM interprets constitution to understand governance rules
- Tools ensure correctness for calculations
- Complete auditability with reasoning and citations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-08 14:24:23 -07:00

10 KiB

Transformative Justice Dispute Resolution

A process addressing immediate harm while transforming conditions that enabled it

This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.


Article: Dispute Resolution

Section 1: Principles and Values

Core Values This community operates on seven transformative justice principles:

  1. Liberation - Building a world where all can thrive
  2. Accountability without punishment - Responsibility without state violence
  3. Safety and support - For all involved, especially most impacted
  4. Collective action - Community involvement, not isolation
  5. Addressing root causes - Changing conditions that enabled harm
  6. Faith in transformation - People's capacity to change and heal
  7. Sustainability - Long-term commitment to change

Transformative Approach We address not just individual incidents but:

  • Patterns of behavior
  • Power dynamics at play
  • Structural and systemic factors
  • Community conditions that enable harm
  • Long-term cultural change

Community Standards

  • Documentation in accessible formats
  • Multiple languages if needed
  • Regular workshops on values and practices
  • Living document that evolves
  • Bot maintains current materials

Section 2: Initiating the Process

Multiple Entry Points Process can be initiated via:

  • Secure online form
  • Phone hotline
  • Direct conversation with trained member
  • Through support person or ally
  • Anonymous reporting option

Initial Assessment Within 48 hours:

  • Initial safety assessment
  • Identify immediate needs
  • Determine process appropriateness
  • Form facilitation team
  • Begin gathering support

Who Can Initiate Process can be started by:

  • Person directly harmed
  • Witnesses to harm
  • Community members concerned about patterns
  • Person who caused harm seeking accountability
  • Support people acting on behalf of others

Section 3: Support Teams and Facilitation

Facilitation Teams Teams of 2-3 trained members:

  • Guide overall process
  • Coordinate different components
  • Hold complexity and multiple timelines
  • Connect to resources
  • Maintain process integrity

Support Teams for All Parties Each person involved has support team:

  • Person harmed: support, advocacy, healing resources
  • Person who caused harm: accountability support, transformation work
  • Community members: processing impact, staying engaged
  • Support teams meet separately and coordinate

Trauma-Informed Practice All facilitators trained in:

  • Recognizing trauma responses
  • Creating safety
  • Preventing re-traumatization
  • Cultural competency
  • Power analysis
  • Self-care and sustainability

Section 4: Communication Norms and Ground Rules

Process Agreements Participants commit to:

  • Using "I" statements about personal experience
  • Active listening without interruption
  • Acknowledging systemic factors alongside individual actions
  • Respecting different paces of healing
  • Maintaining confidentiality with specified exceptions
  • Supporting long-term transformation

Safety Protocols Process includes:

  • Safety planning with those harmed
  • Boundaries around contact between parties
  • Emergency contacts and backup plans
  • Clear escalation procedures
  • Regular safety check-ins
  • Willingness to pause or modify process

Section 5: Assessment and Analysis

Multi-Level Analysis Comprehensive assessment examines:

  • Individual harm - Specific impact on those harmed
  • Behavioral patterns - History and context of actions
  • Relationship dynamics - Power imbalances and history
  • Community factors - Cultural norms enabling harm
  • Structural factors - Systemic oppression and inequality

Understanding Root Causes Exploring questions like:

  • What conditions made this harm possible?
  • What systems of oppression are at play?
  • What community norms need transformation?
  • What resources or education were missing?
  • How do we prevent future harm?

Scope and Appropriateness Most appropriate for:

  • Community-based interventions
  • Addressing root causes
  • Pattern behavior requiring transformation
  • Situations where state intervention would cause more harm
  • Building community capacity for accountability

When State Systems Needed Acknowledge that sometimes:

  • Immediate safety requires outside intervention
  • Survivors choose to involve authorities
  • Legal processes run parallel to community process
  • TJ complements rather than replaces

Section 6: Voluntary Participation

Consent-Based Process Participation is voluntary:

  • Those harmed decide their involvement level
  • Person who caused harm encouraged but not forced
  • Community members choose engagement
  • Can pause or leave at any time
  • Different participation levels available

When Someone Declines Process may continue focusing on:

  • Support for those harmed
  • Community education and prevention
  • Systemic changes to prevent future harm
  • Transformation work with willing participants
  • Community accountability even without direct participation

Section 7: Deliberation Process

Multiple Formats Process uses various formats:

  • Large group dialogue sessions
  • One-on-one conversations
  • Small group discussions
  • Writing and reflection
  • Artistic expression
  • Action and practice

Trauma-Informed Pacing

  • Respects different healing timelines
  • Allows breaks and pauses
  • No rushing toward resolution
  • Honors that transformation takes time
  • Regular check-ins on pacing

Participants May include:

  • Core participants (harmed, harm-doer)
  • Support people for all parties
  • Facilitation team members
  • Community stakeholders
  • Witnesses and those impacted
  • Content experts (when needed)

Section 8: Solution-Building

Structured Brainstorming Through facilitated process, identify solutions at multiple levels:

  • Individual healing - What does person harmed need?
  • Individual accountability - What work must harm-doer do?
  • Relationship repair - Can/should relationship be rebuilt?
  • Community education - What does community need to learn?
  • Systemic change - What structures need transformation?

Addressing Multiple Levels Effective transformative justice includes:

  • Immediate safety and support
  • Personal transformation work
  • Relationship healing (if possible/desired)
  • Community education and awareness
  • Policy and practice changes
  • Cultural shift in community norms

Section 9: Decision-Making and Agreements

Consensus-Based Decisions prioritize those most impacted:

  • Person harmed has most weight
  • Others consent to support plans
  • Creative, multi-faceted agreements
  • Flexible and revisable over time

Types of Commitments Agreements often include:

For person who caused harm:

  • Education and learning (workshops, reading, mentorship)
  • Therapy or counseling
  • Behavioral changes with accountability
  • Restitution or repair actions
  • Community service
  • Regular check-ins with accountability team

For community:

  • Policy changes
  • Educational programming
  • Resource allocation
  • Cultural norm shifting
  • Support structures for prevention

For those harmed:

  • Healing resources and support
  • Safety measures
  • Decision-making power over process
  • Community accountability to their needs

Section 10: Implementation and Accountability

Long-Term Commitment Transformation requires time:

  • Process may span months or years
  • Regular check-ins and adjustments
  • Sustained community engagement
  • Resources for long-term support
  • Celebrating progress while maintaining accountability

Accountability Structures Include:

  • Regular reporting to accountability team
  • Observable behavioral changes
  • Community witness and support
  • Consequences for non-compliance (decided by those harmed)
  • Repair of trust over time

When Commitments Aren't Met If person doesn't follow through:

  • Facilitation team addresses with person
  • Support team explores barriers
  • May adjust expectations or timeline
  • Those harmed decide on consequences
  • May include separation from community

Section 11: Extending Timeline and Process Evolution

Flexible Timeline Process adapts as needed:

  • May extend timeline for transformation work
  • Can bring in additional expertise
  • Might adapt focus while maintaining goals
  • Responds to changing circumstances
  • Honors that healing isn't linear

Specialist Support May bring in specialists for:

  • Trauma counseling
  • Addiction support
  • Mental health expertise
  • Cultural or language support
  • Legal advice
  • Youth or elder-specific support

Section 12: Reconsideration and Follow-Up

Structured Reassessment Process revisited when:

  • Agreements not being implemented
  • New information emerges about harm
  • Harm recurs or patterns continue
  • More support needed
  • Ready for next phase of work

Follow-Up Process Includes:

  • Review of original agreements
  • Assessment of what's working
  • Identification of implementation gaps
  • Adjustment of expectations or support
  • Recognition of growth and change
  • Planning next phases

Section 13: Information Sharing and Privacy

Consent-Based Sharing Information shared based on:

  • Explicit consent of those involved
  • Need for safety of community
  • Supporting accountability
  • Educational value for community
  • Always protecting most impacted

Community Learning While protecting individuals:

  • Pattern-level data shared for prevention
  • Educational materials developed from learnings
  • Community workshops on prevention
  • De-identified case studies (with consent)
  • Building community capacity

Record Keeping Bot maintains:

  • Process timeline and phases
  • Agreements and commitments
  • Check-in schedules
  • Accountability tracking
  • Resources and referrals
  • Consent documentation

Implementation Notes for Bot

When supporting transformative justice process:

  1. Hold complexity - Multiple timelines, participants, and goals
  2. Center most impacted - Prioritize needs of those harmed
  3. Track accountability - Support long-term commitment tracking
  4. Respect consent - All information sharing requires permission
  5. Support facilitation - Coordinate logistics for complex process
  6. Connect resources - Link to community support and expertise
  7. Long-term view - Transformation takes time, support sustained engagement
  8. Learn and adapt - Use patterns to prevent future harm

This process works best when:

  • Community committed to root cause transformation
  • Resources available for long-term support
  • Skilled facilitation teams in place
  • Analysis of systems of oppression included
  • Focus on liberation, not just resolution
  • Community willing to change itself
  • State alternatives needed/desired