This commit completes the transition to a pure LLM-driven agentic governance system with no hard-coded governance logic. Core Architecture Changes: - Add structured memory system (memory.py) for tracking governance processes - Add LLM tools (tools.py) for deterministic operations (math, dates, random) - Add audit trail system (audit.py) for human-readable decision explanations - Add LLM-driven agent (agent_refactored.py) that interprets constitution Documentation: - Add ARCHITECTURE.md describing process-centric design - Add ARCHITECTURE_EXAMPLE.md with complete workflow walkthrough - Update README.md to reflect current LLM-driven architecture - Simplify constitution.md to benevolent dictator model for testing Templates: - Add 8 governance templates (petition, consensus, do-ocracy, jury, etc.) - Add 8 dispute resolution templates - All templates work with generic process-based architecture Key Design Principles: - "Process" is central abstraction (not "proposal") - No hard-coded process types or thresholds - LLM interprets constitution to understand governance rules - Tools ensure correctness for calculations - Complete auditability with reasoning and citations Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
354 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
354 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Transformative Justice Dispute Resolution
|
|
|
|
*A process addressing immediate harm while transforming conditions that enabled it*
|
|
|
|
This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Article: Dispute Resolution
|
|
|
|
### Section 1: Principles and Values
|
|
|
|
**Core Values**
|
|
This community operates on seven transformative justice principles:
|
|
1. **Liberation** - Building a world where all can thrive
|
|
2. **Accountability without punishment** - Responsibility without state violence
|
|
3. **Safety and support** - For all involved, especially most impacted
|
|
4. **Collective action** - Community involvement, not isolation
|
|
5. **Addressing root causes** - Changing conditions that enabled harm
|
|
6. **Faith in transformation** - People's capacity to change and heal
|
|
7. **Sustainability** - Long-term commitment to change
|
|
|
|
**Transformative Approach**
|
|
We address not just individual incidents but:
|
|
- Patterns of behavior
|
|
- Power dynamics at play
|
|
- Structural and systemic factors
|
|
- Community conditions that enable harm
|
|
- Long-term cultural change
|
|
|
|
**Community Standards**
|
|
- Documentation in accessible formats
|
|
- Multiple languages if needed
|
|
- Regular workshops on values and practices
|
|
- Living document that evolves
|
|
- Bot maintains current materials
|
|
|
|
### Section 2: Initiating the Process
|
|
|
|
**Multiple Entry Points**
|
|
Process can be initiated via:
|
|
- Secure online form
|
|
- Phone hotline
|
|
- Direct conversation with trained member
|
|
- Through support person or ally
|
|
- Anonymous reporting option
|
|
|
|
**Initial Assessment**
|
|
Within 48 hours:
|
|
- Initial safety assessment
|
|
- Identify immediate needs
|
|
- Determine process appropriateness
|
|
- Form facilitation team
|
|
- Begin gathering support
|
|
|
|
**Who Can Initiate**
|
|
Process can be started by:
|
|
- Person directly harmed
|
|
- Witnesses to harm
|
|
- Community members concerned about patterns
|
|
- Person who caused harm seeking accountability
|
|
- Support people acting on behalf of others
|
|
|
|
### Section 3: Support Teams and Facilitation
|
|
|
|
**Facilitation Teams**
|
|
Teams of 2-3 trained members:
|
|
- Guide overall process
|
|
- Coordinate different components
|
|
- Hold complexity and multiple timelines
|
|
- Connect to resources
|
|
- Maintain process integrity
|
|
|
|
**Support Teams for All Parties**
|
|
Each person involved has support team:
|
|
- Person harmed: support, advocacy, healing resources
|
|
- Person who caused harm: accountability support, transformation work
|
|
- Community members: processing impact, staying engaged
|
|
- Support teams meet separately and coordinate
|
|
|
|
**Trauma-Informed Practice**
|
|
All facilitators trained in:
|
|
- Recognizing trauma responses
|
|
- Creating safety
|
|
- Preventing re-traumatization
|
|
- Cultural competency
|
|
- Power analysis
|
|
- Self-care and sustainability
|
|
|
|
### Section 4: Communication Norms and Ground Rules
|
|
|
|
**Process Agreements**
|
|
Participants commit to:
|
|
- Using "I" statements about personal experience
|
|
- Active listening without interruption
|
|
- Acknowledging systemic factors alongside individual actions
|
|
- Respecting different paces of healing
|
|
- Maintaining confidentiality with specified exceptions
|
|
- Supporting long-term transformation
|
|
|
|
**Safety Protocols**
|
|
Process includes:
|
|
- Safety planning with those harmed
|
|
- Boundaries around contact between parties
|
|
- Emergency contacts and backup plans
|
|
- Clear escalation procedures
|
|
- Regular safety check-ins
|
|
- Willingness to pause or modify process
|
|
|
|
### Section 5: Assessment and Analysis
|
|
|
|
**Multi-Level Analysis**
|
|
Comprehensive assessment examines:
|
|
- **Individual harm** - Specific impact on those harmed
|
|
- **Behavioral patterns** - History and context of actions
|
|
- **Relationship dynamics** - Power imbalances and history
|
|
- **Community factors** - Cultural norms enabling harm
|
|
- **Structural factors** - Systemic oppression and inequality
|
|
|
|
**Understanding Root Causes**
|
|
Exploring questions like:
|
|
- What conditions made this harm possible?
|
|
- What systems of oppression are at play?
|
|
- What community norms need transformation?
|
|
- What resources or education were missing?
|
|
- How do we prevent future harm?
|
|
|
|
**Scope and Appropriateness**
|
|
Most appropriate for:
|
|
- Community-based interventions
|
|
- Addressing root causes
|
|
- Pattern behavior requiring transformation
|
|
- Situations where state intervention would cause more harm
|
|
- Building community capacity for accountability
|
|
|
|
**When State Systems Needed**
|
|
Acknowledge that sometimes:
|
|
- Immediate safety requires outside intervention
|
|
- Survivors choose to involve authorities
|
|
- Legal processes run parallel to community process
|
|
- TJ complements rather than replaces
|
|
|
|
### Section 6: Voluntary Participation
|
|
|
|
**Consent-Based Process**
|
|
Participation is voluntary:
|
|
- Those harmed decide their involvement level
|
|
- Person who caused harm encouraged but not forced
|
|
- Community members choose engagement
|
|
- Can pause or leave at any time
|
|
- Different participation levels available
|
|
|
|
**When Someone Declines**
|
|
Process may continue focusing on:
|
|
- Support for those harmed
|
|
- Community education and prevention
|
|
- Systemic changes to prevent future harm
|
|
- Transformation work with willing participants
|
|
- Community accountability even without direct participation
|
|
|
|
### Section 7: Deliberation Process
|
|
|
|
**Multiple Formats**
|
|
Process uses various formats:
|
|
- Large group dialogue sessions
|
|
- One-on-one conversations
|
|
- Small group discussions
|
|
- Writing and reflection
|
|
- Artistic expression
|
|
- Action and practice
|
|
|
|
**Trauma-Informed Pacing**
|
|
- Respects different healing timelines
|
|
- Allows breaks and pauses
|
|
- No rushing toward resolution
|
|
- Honors that transformation takes time
|
|
- Regular check-ins on pacing
|
|
|
|
**Participants**
|
|
May include:
|
|
- Core participants (harmed, harm-doer)
|
|
- Support people for all parties
|
|
- Facilitation team members
|
|
- Community stakeholders
|
|
- Witnesses and those impacted
|
|
- Content experts (when needed)
|
|
|
|
### Section 8: Solution-Building
|
|
|
|
**Structured Brainstorming**
|
|
Through facilitated process, identify solutions at multiple levels:
|
|
- **Individual healing** - What does person harmed need?
|
|
- **Individual accountability** - What work must harm-doer do?
|
|
- **Relationship repair** - Can/should relationship be rebuilt?
|
|
- **Community education** - What does community need to learn?
|
|
- **Systemic change** - What structures need transformation?
|
|
|
|
**Addressing Multiple Levels**
|
|
Effective transformative justice includes:
|
|
- Immediate safety and support
|
|
- Personal transformation work
|
|
- Relationship healing (if possible/desired)
|
|
- Community education and awareness
|
|
- Policy and practice changes
|
|
- Cultural shift in community norms
|
|
|
|
### Section 9: Decision-Making and Agreements
|
|
|
|
**Consensus-Based**
|
|
Decisions prioritize those most impacted:
|
|
- Person harmed has most weight
|
|
- Others consent to support plans
|
|
- Creative, multi-faceted agreements
|
|
- Flexible and revisable over time
|
|
|
|
**Types of Commitments**
|
|
Agreements often include:
|
|
|
|
*For person who caused harm:*
|
|
- Education and learning (workshops, reading, mentorship)
|
|
- Therapy or counseling
|
|
- Behavioral changes with accountability
|
|
- Restitution or repair actions
|
|
- Community service
|
|
- Regular check-ins with accountability team
|
|
|
|
*For community:*
|
|
- Policy changes
|
|
- Educational programming
|
|
- Resource allocation
|
|
- Cultural norm shifting
|
|
- Support structures for prevention
|
|
|
|
*For those harmed:*
|
|
- Healing resources and support
|
|
- Safety measures
|
|
- Decision-making power over process
|
|
- Community accountability to their needs
|
|
|
|
### Section 10: Implementation and Accountability
|
|
|
|
**Long-Term Commitment**
|
|
Transformation requires time:
|
|
- Process may span months or years
|
|
- Regular check-ins and adjustments
|
|
- Sustained community engagement
|
|
- Resources for long-term support
|
|
- Celebrating progress while maintaining accountability
|
|
|
|
**Accountability Structures**
|
|
Include:
|
|
- Regular reporting to accountability team
|
|
- Observable behavioral changes
|
|
- Community witness and support
|
|
- Consequences for non-compliance (decided by those harmed)
|
|
- Repair of trust over time
|
|
|
|
**When Commitments Aren't Met**
|
|
If person doesn't follow through:
|
|
- Facilitation team addresses with person
|
|
- Support team explores barriers
|
|
- May adjust expectations or timeline
|
|
- Those harmed decide on consequences
|
|
- May include separation from community
|
|
|
|
### Section 11: Extending Timeline and Process Evolution
|
|
|
|
**Flexible Timeline**
|
|
Process adapts as needed:
|
|
- May extend timeline for transformation work
|
|
- Can bring in additional expertise
|
|
- Might adapt focus while maintaining goals
|
|
- Responds to changing circumstances
|
|
- Honors that healing isn't linear
|
|
|
|
**Specialist Support**
|
|
May bring in specialists for:
|
|
- Trauma counseling
|
|
- Addiction support
|
|
- Mental health expertise
|
|
- Cultural or language support
|
|
- Legal advice
|
|
- Youth or elder-specific support
|
|
|
|
### Section 12: Reconsideration and Follow-Up
|
|
|
|
**Structured Reassessment**
|
|
Process revisited when:
|
|
- Agreements not being implemented
|
|
- New information emerges about harm
|
|
- Harm recurs or patterns continue
|
|
- More support needed
|
|
- Ready for next phase of work
|
|
|
|
**Follow-Up Process**
|
|
Includes:
|
|
- Review of original agreements
|
|
- Assessment of what's working
|
|
- Identification of implementation gaps
|
|
- Adjustment of expectations or support
|
|
- Recognition of growth and change
|
|
- Planning next phases
|
|
|
|
### Section 13: Information Sharing and Privacy
|
|
|
|
**Consent-Based Sharing**
|
|
Information shared based on:
|
|
- Explicit consent of those involved
|
|
- Need for safety of community
|
|
- Supporting accountability
|
|
- Educational value for community
|
|
- Always protecting most impacted
|
|
|
|
**Community Learning**
|
|
While protecting individuals:
|
|
- Pattern-level data shared for prevention
|
|
- Educational materials developed from learnings
|
|
- Community workshops on prevention
|
|
- De-identified case studies (with consent)
|
|
- Building community capacity
|
|
|
|
**Record Keeping**
|
|
Bot maintains:
|
|
- Process timeline and phases
|
|
- Agreements and commitments
|
|
- Check-in schedules
|
|
- Accountability tracking
|
|
- Resources and referrals
|
|
- Consent documentation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Notes for Bot
|
|
|
|
When supporting transformative justice process:
|
|
|
|
1. **Hold complexity** - Multiple timelines, participants, and goals
|
|
2. **Center most impacted** - Prioritize needs of those harmed
|
|
3. **Track accountability** - Support long-term commitment tracking
|
|
4. **Respect consent** - All information sharing requires permission
|
|
5. **Support facilitation** - Coordinate logistics for complex process
|
|
6. **Connect resources** - Link to community support and expertise
|
|
7. **Long-term view** - Transformation takes time, support sustained engagement
|
|
8. **Learn and adapt** - Use patterns to prevent future harm
|
|
|
|
This process works best when:
|
|
- Community committed to root cause transformation
|
|
- Resources available for long-term support
|
|
- Skilled facilitation teams in place
|
|
- Analysis of systems of oppression included
|
|
- Focus on liberation, not just resolution
|
|
- Community willing to change itself
|
|
- State alternatives needed/desired
|