agentic-govbot/templates/dispute-resolution/shalish-mediation.md

# Shalish Mediation Dispute Resolution

*A modernized approach to traditional village-level mediation, developed with cultural sensitivity and practical improvements*

This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.

---

## Article: Dispute Resolution

### Section 1: Principles and Values

**Core Values**
This community centers on:
- **Community harmony** - Restoring peaceful relationships
- **Restorative justice** - Repair over punishment
- **Cultural respect** - Honoring traditional wisdom
- **Fairness** - Just outcomes for all parties
- **Collective wellbeing** - Community health over individual "winning"

**Traditional Roots, Modern Adaptation**
This process:
- Draws from Bangladesh's traditional village-level mediation (Shalish)
- Adapts practices for contemporary contexts
- Honors cultural traditions while addressing historical limitations
- Emphasizes consensual rather than imposed solutions
- Maintains community-based approach

**Community Standards**
- Handbook documents procedures
- Explains cultural traditions and adaptations
- Available in local languages as needed
- Trained mediators orient new members
- Bot maintains accessible documentation

### Section 2: When to Use Shalish Mediation

**Appropriate Disputes**
Well-suited for:
- Interpersonal conflicts between community members
- Family or household disagreements
- Neighbor disputes
- Resource sharing conflicts
- Misunderstandings and communication breakdowns
- Matters affecting community cohesion

**Community-Centered Approach**
This process emphasizes:
- Maintaining community relationships
- Collective resources and shared spaces
- Cultural values and traditions
- Long-term harmony over quick fixes
- Face-saving and dignity for all

**When Alternative Processes Better**
Consider other approaches for:
- Cases involving serious violence
- Power imbalances requiring advocacy
- Situations where mediation pressure inappropriate
- Legal violations needing formal process
- Cases needing specialized expertise

### Section 3: The Role of Mediators

**Mediator Responsibilities**
Mediators:
- Help parties communicate effectively
- Educate about mediation benefits
- Facilitate discussion without imposing solutions
- Ensure fair process
- Document agreements
- Follow up on implementation

**What Mediators Don't Do**
Explicitly, mediators:
- Do not render judgments or decisions
- Do not advocate for either party
- Do not enforce agreements
- Do not enforce laws
- Do not take sides

**Mediator Selection and Training**
- Community identifies potential mediators
- Training in mediation techniques and cultural sensitivity
- Understanding of traditional and modern practices
- Ongoing education and support
- Bot tracks trained mediator roster

**Solo or Co-Mediation**
Mediators decide based on case:
- Single mediator for straightforward disputes
- Co-mediation for complex cases
- Diverse pair for balanced perspectives
- Cultural considerations in selection
- Parties informed of mediator selection

### Section 4: Initiating Mediation

**Requesting Mediation**
Disputants request through:
- Direct contact with known mediator
- Request to mediation coordinator via @govbot
- Referral from community leader
- Mutual agreement to try mediation

**Mediator Outreach**
After request received:
- Mediator contacts both parties
- Explains mediation process and benefits
- Answers questions and addresses concerns
- Ensures voluntary participation
- Schedules initial meetings

**Setting Expectations**
Mediators educate parties about:
- How mediation works
- Benefits of collaborative problem-solving
- Mediator's neutral role
- Voluntary nature of process
- Confidentiality
- Focus on future solutions

### Section 5: Process Structure

**Preparation Phase**
Before joint session:
- Mediator collects initial statements from each party
- Meets privately with each party
- Understands perspectives and interests
- Identifies key issues
- Assesses readiness for joint meeting

**Establishing Logistics**
Mediator arranges:
- Neutral meeting location
- Convenient time for all parties
- Appropriate physical setup
- Any needed accommodations
- Virtual options if appropriate

**Joint Mediation Session**
Typical structure:
1. Mediator opening and ground rules (10 min)
2. Each party's uninterrupted statement (15-20 min each)
3. Mediator clarification and summarizing
4. Issue identification and prioritization
5. Discussion and option generation
6. Agreement building
7. Documenting outcome
8. Closing and follow-up planning

**Session Duration**
- Typically 2-3 hours for joint session
- Breaks as needed
- May require multiple sessions
- Flexible pacing based on needs

### Section 6: Ground Rules and Communication Principles

**Core Communication Agreements**
All participants commit to:
- **Speak for yourself** - Use "I" statements
- **Avoid blame** - Focus on impacts and needs, not accusations
- **Don't interrupt** - Let each person finish
- **Attack problems, not people** - Separate issue from person
- **Listen to understand** - Not just to respond
- **Respect confidentiality** - What's shared stays private
- **Participate in good faith** - Genuine effort to resolve

**Mediator Enforcement**
Mediator gently enforces rules:
- Reminds if ground rules broken
- Reframes inflammatory statements
- Takes breaks if tensions high
- May meet separately if needed
- Maintains respectful atmosphere

### Section 7: Voluntary Participation

**Truly Voluntary**
Process is voluntary:
- Either party can decline
- Can leave at any time
- No consequences for non-participation
- Agreements only if both consent
- No coercion or pressure

**Social Expectations**
While technically voluntary:
- Community culture may create social pressure
- Expectation to attempt resolution
- Face-saving considerations
- Mediator acknowledges these dynamics
- Works to ensure genuine choice

**When Someone Declines**
If party refuses mediation:
- Respect their decision
- Explore reasons if willing to share
- Alternative pathways available
- No formal consequences
- May return to mediation later if circumstances change

### Section 8: Assessment and Understanding

**Seeking Clarity**
Mediators help parties:
- Share their perspectives fully
- Understand each other's views
- Identify underlying interests
- Clarify facts versus interpretations
- Recognize common ground
- Define what resolution looks like

**Developing Consensual Standards**
Rather than imposing standards:
- Parties discuss what fairness means here
- Reference shared community values
- Consider cultural traditions
- Build mutual understanding
- Create their own framework

**Background Information**
Mediator gathers understanding of:
- History of relationship
- Previous conflicts or agreements
- Community context
- Cultural considerations
- Other factors affecting dispute

### Section 9: Deliberation Process

**Information Sharing**
Information flows through:
- Direct testimony from parties
- Witness accounts if relevant and agreed
- Documents if provided
- Mediator ensures all perspectives heard
- Focus on understanding, not proving

**Additional Voices**
May include:
- **Primary parties** - Central to process
- **Community representatives** - For disputes affecting collective resources
- **Family representatives** - In family-related matters
- **Elders or respected members** - For cultural guidance
- **Witnesses** - If parties agree
- All additional participants by mutual agreement

**Mediator Principles**
Throughout deliberation, mediators:
- Don't interject their own views when parties agree
- "Reality test" disagreements without judgment
- Help parties explore consequences of options
- Support creative problem-solving
- Trust parties to find their own solutions

### Section 10: Resolution and Agreement

**Building Consensus**
Resolution emerges through:
- Negotiation facilitated by mediator
- Consensus-building around options
- Creative solutions addressing both parties' needs
- Voluntary agreement by all
- No imposed solutions

**Types of Agreements**
May include:
- Behavior changes
- Communication protocols
- Resource sharing arrangements
- Apologies or acknowledgments
- Restitution or repair
- Boundaries or separation
- Future conflict prevention

**Drafting Agreement**
Mediator:
- Documents agreed points in writing
- Uses clear, specific language
- Both parties review and approve
- All sign the agreement
- Each party receives copy
- Submit to @govbot for records

**When Agreement Not Reached**
If mediation doesn't result in full agreement:
- Partial agreements still valuable
- Document any progress made
- Identify remaining issues
- Discuss next steps
- No penalty for non-resolution

### Section 11: When Mediation Doesn't Work

**Reasons Mediation May Fail**
- Parties too far apart
- Power imbalances too significant
- Emotions too raw
- Issues too complex
- Not right time
- Parties not in good faith

**Alternative Options**
Mediator may suggest:
- **Break and return later** - Time for reflection
- **Additional community input** - Broader consultation
- **Different approach** - Try facilitated dialogue or circle process
- **Formal referral** - To governance body or external resources
- **New mediators** - Different personalities might work better
- **Separation protocols** - If co-existence not possible

**No Failure in Trying**
Important to recognize:
- Attempting mediation is valuable
- Understanding gained even without resolution
- Seeds planted for future resolution
- Shows good faith effort
- Community appreciates the try

### Section 12: Implementation and Follow-Up

**Agreement Implementation**
Parties responsible for:
- Following through on commitments
- Timeline agreed in mediation
- Self-monitoring and accountability
- Reaching out if issues arise

**Mediator Follow-Up**
After agreement:
- Check-in scheduled (typically 30 days)
- Parties report on implementation
- Address any difficulties
- Celebrate successes
- Modify if needed

**Community Support**
If appropriate:
- Community supports implementation
- Resources provided as needed
- Informal monitoring by respected members
- Encouragement and acknowledgment

### Section 13: Reconsideration and Follow-Up Mediation

**When to Reconvene**
Follow-up mediation appropriate when:
- New information emerges
- Circumstances have changed
- Agreement proving unworkable
- Commitments not being met
- New conflicts arise from original issue

**Requesting Follow-Up**
Either party may request:
- Contact original mediators
- Contact coordinating organization via @govbot
- Explain need for follow-up
- Reassessment determines if follow-up session needed

**Fresh Start or Continuation**
Follow-up may be:
- Continuation with same mediators
- Fresh process with new mediators
- Modified approach based on learnings
- Focus on specific unresolved elements

### Section 14: Information and Privacy

**Confidentiality**
Strong confidentiality protections:
- Case details remain among participants
- Mediators don't share specifics
- Agreements shared only as needed for implementation
- Exceptions only for safety concerns

**Community Learning**
While protecting individuals:
- Aggregated statistics support program evaluation
- Success rates and types of disputes tracked
- Patterns inform mediator training
- No identifying information shared
- Annual reports on mediation program

**Record Keeping**
Bot maintains:
- Mediation requests and responses
- Mediator assignments
- Agreements (confidential access)
- Follow-up schedules
- Anonymized outcome data

### Section 15: Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation

**Honoring Tradition**
This process honors traditional Shalish by:
- Maintaining community-based approach
- Valuing relationship preservation
- Involving respected community members
- Seeking harmonious solutions
- Recognizing collective over individual

**Modern Improvements**
Contemporary adaptations include:
- Voluntary rather than compulsory
- Trained mediators rather than just elders
- Gender equity in mediator selection
- Protection against power abuse
- Focus on consensus not authority
- Structured process with ground rules

**Ongoing Evolution**
Process continues to evolve:
- Community feedback incorporated
- Training updated regularly
- Cultural practices respected
- Modern best practices integrated
- Balance of tradition and innovation

---

## Implementation Notes for Bot

When supporting Shalish mediation process:

1. **Cultural competency** - Understand cultural context and traditions
2. **Mediator matching** - Connect parties with appropriate mediators
3. **Process flexibility** - Support various formats and pacing
4. **Privacy protection** - Strong confidentiality for this voluntary process
5. **Follow-up facilitation** - Enable ongoing support and check-ins
6. **Community learning** - Track patterns while protecting individuals
7. **Resource connection** - Link to alternative processes when needed

This process works best when:
- Community values harmony and relationship
- Cultural traditions respected
- Skilled mediators available and trusted
- Voluntary nature genuinely upheld
- Focus on consensus over authority
- Long-term relationships matter more than being "right"
- Community provides supportive context