adilalloandCursor
bcbc6f30d9
The real-group profiles stay as a test, so a change that moves a pick fails. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
210 lines
8.0 KiB
JSON
210 lines
8.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"about": "Old card id to new card id, for drafts and published Rules saved before the remake. A null target means the card was cut and its content moved to another deck or card listed in movedTo. movedTo names each card the content moved to by deck and id, so a loader can tell a group where it went. A value mapped to null was cut, as Holocracy was.",
|
|
"methods": {
|
|
"decisionApproaches": {
|
|
"algorithm-driven-decisions": "decide-by-formula",
|
|
"autocratic-decision-making": "one-person-decides",
|
|
"collaborative-platforms": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "communication",
|
|
"id": "loomio"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"reason": "A tool, not a way of deciding. Any decision card can run on Loomio or a forum, and the tools keep their own cards in the communication deck, so a group picks a method here and a tool there."
|
|
},
|
|
"deliberative-polling": "panel-drawn-by-lot",
|
|
"executive-committees": "coordinating-committee",
|
|
"first-past-the-post": "majority-rule",
|
|
"holacracy": "consent-sociocracy",
|
|
"investor-filled-board-seats": "appointed-board",
|
|
"lottery-sortition": "panel-drawn-by-lot",
|
|
"proof-of-work": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "decisionApproaches",
|
|
"id": "weighted-voting"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"reason": "How a blockchain orders transactions, not how members decide. Its one useful idea, say that follows recorded work, is now an option on Weighted voting, and its fork becomes the right to leave."
|
|
},
|
|
"range-voting": "score-voting",
|
|
"rotational-leadership": "rotating-roles",
|
|
"sociocracy": "consent-sociocracy"
|
|
},
|
|
"membership": {
|
|
"application-review": "application-and-review",
|
|
"collective-interviews": "members-approve-new-members",
|
|
"consensus-or-vote-based-approval": "members-approve-new-members",
|
|
"contribution-based": "join-by-contributing",
|
|
"hybrid-approval-process": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "membership",
|
|
"id": "application-and-review"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"reason": "It described a stack of other cards rather than a practice, and the tool now combines cards by design. Its application, screening, trial and ratification steps come from picking Application and review, Trial period and Members approve new members together. The Federated Clusters template lists it and should list Member groups instead."
|
|
},
|
|
"identity-verification": "one-person-one-account",
|
|
"invitation-only": "vouching",
|
|
"lottery-sortition": "lottery-for-limited-places",
|
|
"membership-agreement-or-pledge": "membership-agreement",
|
|
"mentorship": "companions",
|
|
"open-access": "open-admission",
|
|
"orientation-required": "orientation",
|
|
"pay-to-join": "member-share-or-dues",
|
|
"peer-sponsorship": "vouching",
|
|
"referral-system-with-screening": "application-and-review",
|
|
"skill-based-contribution": "join-by-contributing",
|
|
"skill-based-evaluation": "requirements-for-some-roles",
|
|
"trial-period-provisional-membership": "trial-period",
|
|
"weighted-or-tiered-membership": "volunteers-and-core-members"
|
|
},
|
|
"conflictManagement": {
|
|
"ad-hoc-arbitration": "non-binding-arbitration",
|
|
"binding-contracts": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
|
"id": "disputes-with-partners"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"note": "disputes-with-partners, which writes dispute steps into agreements with partners. Template Benevolent Dictator lists it.",
|
|
"reason": "A legal instrument, not a way of managing conflict, and it was checked for every kind of group, including one-member founders."
|
|
},
|
|
"conflict-resolution-council": "conflict-working-group",
|
|
"consensus-building": "mediation",
|
|
"facilitated-negotiation": "mediation",
|
|
"interest-based-bargaining": "mediation",
|
|
"internal-tribunal": "hearing-panel",
|
|
"judicial-committees": "hearing-panel",
|
|
"lottery-sortition": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "decisionApproaches",
|
|
"id": "random-choice"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
|
"id": "hearing-panel"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"note": "random-choice (decision deck) for ties and small choices. hearing-panel for drawing panelists by lot. Template Sortition (Jury) lists it.",
|
|
"reason": "A way to decide, not a conflict practice, and it duplicates the decision deck's Random choice. Refusing the result was called bad faith."
|
|
},
|
|
"peer-mediation": "conflict-ladder",
|
|
"rotational-judging": "hearing-panel",
|
|
"supermajority-vote": {
|
|
"target": null,
|
|
"movedTo": [
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "membership",
|
|
"id": "ending-a-membership"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"deck": "decisionApproaches",
|
|
"id": "supermajority-rule"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"note": "ending-a-membership (membership deck) for removal votes. supermajority-rule (decision deck) for policy deadlocks. Templates Quadratic Governance and Petition list it.",
|
|
"reason": "Two jobs on one card. Removing a member is the membership deck's removal job, and a vote to break a deadlock over policy is a decision, not a conflict practice. Its fixed 75 percent also broke the supermajority ruling."
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"communication": {}
|
|
},
|
|
"coreValues": {
|
|
"about": "Today a core value chip id is its 1-based position in coreValues.json. oldPositionToNewId maps each old position to the new stable id. Ship stable ids (the id field) so this never happens again.",
|
|
"oldPositionToNewId": {
|
|
"1": "accessibility",
|
|
"2": "accountability",
|
|
"3": "adaptability",
|
|
"4": "agency",
|
|
"5": "generosity",
|
|
"6": "anti-oppression",
|
|
"7": "autonomy",
|
|
"8": "capacity-building",
|
|
"9": "cooperation",
|
|
"10": "common-ownership",
|
|
"11": "community-care",
|
|
"12": "managing-conflict",
|
|
"13": "consent",
|
|
"14": "consensus",
|
|
"15": "constructive-feedback",
|
|
"16": "cooperation",
|
|
"17": "copyleft",
|
|
"18": "decentralization",
|
|
"19": "direct-action",
|
|
"20": "diversity",
|
|
"21": "documentation",
|
|
"22": "education",
|
|
"23": "empathy",
|
|
"24": "agency",
|
|
"25": "equity",
|
|
"26": "innovation",
|
|
"27": "fairness",
|
|
"28": "fair-pay",
|
|
"29": "flexibility",
|
|
"30": "forkability",
|
|
"31": "freedom",
|
|
"32": "freedom-of-information",
|
|
"33": "generosity",
|
|
"34": "harm-reduction",
|
|
"35": "interdependence",
|
|
"36": null,
|
|
"37": "honesty",
|
|
"38": "horizontalism",
|
|
"39": "humility",
|
|
"40": "inclusion",
|
|
"41": "inclusion",
|
|
"42": "independence",
|
|
"43": "innovation",
|
|
"44": "integrity",
|
|
"45": "interdependence",
|
|
"46": "interoperability",
|
|
"47": "intersectionality",
|
|
"48": "justice",
|
|
"49": "documentation",
|
|
"50": "labor-rights",
|
|
"51": "leadership",
|
|
"52": "education",
|
|
"53": "freedom",
|
|
"54": "localism",
|
|
"55": "maintenance",
|
|
"56": "capacity-building",
|
|
"57": "contribution",
|
|
"58": "mutual-aid",
|
|
"59": "non-violence",
|
|
"60": "open-source",
|
|
"61": "openness",
|
|
"62": "participation",
|
|
"63": "reliability",
|
|
"64": "resilience",
|
|
"65": "solidarity",
|
|
"66": "stewardship",
|
|
"67": "transparency",
|
|
"68": "trust",
|
|
"69": "voluntarism"
|
|
},
|
|
"labelMerges": {
|
|
"Holocracy": null,
|
|
"Altruism": "Generosity",
|
|
"Collaboration": "Cooperation",
|
|
"Empowerment": "Agency",
|
|
"Experimentation": "Innovation",
|
|
"Holism": "Interdependence",
|
|
"Inclusivity": "Inclusion",
|
|
"Knowledge Sharing": "Documentation",
|
|
"Learning": "Education",
|
|
"Liberty": "Freedom",
|
|
"Mentorship": "Capacity building",
|
|
"Reciprocity": "Mutual aid"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|