Implement LLM-driven governance architecture with structured memory

This commit completes the transition to a pure LLM-driven agentic
governance system with no hard-coded governance logic.

Core Architecture Changes:
- Add structured memory system (memory.py) for tracking governance processes
- Add LLM tools (tools.py) for deterministic operations (math, dates, random)
- Add audit trail system (audit.py) for human-readable decision explanations
- Add LLM-driven agent (agent_refactored.py) that interprets constitution

Documentation:
- Add ARCHITECTURE.md describing process-centric design
- Add ARCHITECTURE_EXAMPLE.md with complete workflow walkthrough
- Update README.md to reflect current LLM-driven architecture
- Simplify constitution.md to benevolent dictator model for testing

Templates:
- Add 8 governance templates (petition, consensus, do-ocracy, jury, etc.)
- Add 8 dispute resolution templates
- All templates work with generic process-based architecture

Key Design Principles:
- "Process" is central abstraction (not "proposal")
- No hard-coded process types or thresholds
- LLM interprets constitution to understand governance rules
- Tools ensure correctness for calculations
- Complete auditability with reasoning and citations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

templates/dispute-resolution/transformative-justice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+# Transformative Justice Dispute Resolution
+
+*A process addressing immediate harm while transforming conditions that enabled it*
+
+This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.
+
+---
+
+## Article: Dispute Resolution
+
+### Section 1: Principles and Values
+
+**Core Values**
+This community operates on seven transformative justice principles:
+1. **Liberation** - Building a world where all can thrive
+2. **Accountability without punishment** - Responsibility without state violence
+3. **Safety and support** - For all involved, especially most impacted
+4. **Collective action** - Community involvement, not isolation
+5. **Addressing root causes** - Changing conditions that enabled harm
+6. **Faith in transformation** - People's capacity to change and heal
+7. **Sustainability** - Long-term commitment to change
+
+**Transformative Approach**
+We address not just individual incidents but:
+- Patterns of behavior
+- Power dynamics at play
+- Structural and systemic factors
+- Community conditions that enable harm
+- Long-term cultural change
+
+**Community Standards**
+- Documentation in accessible formats
+- Multiple languages if needed
+- Regular workshops on values and practices
+- Living document that evolves
+- Bot maintains current materials
+
+### Section 2: Initiating the Process
+
+**Multiple Entry Points**
+Process can be initiated via:
+- Secure online form
+- Phone hotline
+- Direct conversation with trained member
+- Through support person or ally
+- Anonymous reporting option
+
+**Initial Assessment**
+Within 48 hours:
+- Initial safety assessment
+- Identify immediate needs
+- Determine process appropriateness
+- Form facilitation team
+- Begin gathering support
+
+**Who Can Initiate**
+Process can be started by:
+- Person directly harmed
+- Witnesses to harm
+- Community members concerned about patterns
+- Person who caused harm seeking accountability
+- Support people acting on behalf of others
+
+### Section 3: Support Teams and Facilitation
+
+**Facilitation Teams**
+Teams of 2-3 trained members:
+- Guide overall process
+- Coordinate different components
+- Hold complexity and multiple timelines
+- Connect to resources
+- Maintain process integrity
+
+**Support Teams for All Parties**
+Each person involved has support team:
+- Person harmed: support, advocacy, healing resources
+- Person who caused harm: accountability support, transformation work
+- Community members: processing impact, staying engaged
+- Support teams meet separately and coordinate
+
+**Trauma-Informed Practice**
+All facilitators trained in:
+- Recognizing trauma responses
+- Creating safety
+- Preventing re-traumatization
+- Cultural competency
+- Power analysis
+- Self-care and sustainability
+
+### Section 4: Communication Norms and Ground Rules
+
+**Process Agreements**
+Participants commit to:
+- Using "I" statements about personal experience
+- Active listening without interruption
+- Acknowledging systemic factors alongside individual actions
+- Respecting different paces of healing
+- Maintaining confidentiality with specified exceptions
+- Supporting long-term transformation
+
+**Safety Protocols**
+Process includes:
+- Safety planning with those harmed
+- Boundaries around contact between parties
+- Emergency contacts and backup plans
+- Clear escalation procedures
+- Regular safety check-ins
+- Willingness to pause or modify process
+
+### Section 5: Assessment and Analysis
+
+**Multi-Level Analysis**
+Comprehensive assessment examines:
+- **Individual harm** - Specific impact on those harmed
+- **Behavioral patterns** - History and context of actions
+- **Relationship dynamics** - Power imbalances and history
+- **Community factors** - Cultural norms enabling harm
+- **Structural factors** - Systemic oppression and inequality
+
+**Understanding Root Causes**
+Exploring questions like:
+- What conditions made this harm possible?
+- What systems of oppression are at play?
+- What community norms need transformation?
+- What resources or education were missing?
+- How do we prevent future harm?
+
+**Scope and Appropriateness**
+Most appropriate for:
+- Community-based interventions
+- Addressing root causes
+- Pattern behavior requiring transformation
+- Situations where state intervention would cause more harm
+- Building community capacity for accountability
+
+**When State Systems Needed**
+Acknowledge that sometimes:
+- Immediate safety requires outside intervention
+- Survivors choose to involve authorities
+- Legal processes run parallel to community process
+- TJ complements rather than replaces
+
+### Section 6: Voluntary Participation
+
+**Consent-Based Process**
+Participation is voluntary:
+- Those harmed decide their involvement level
+- Person who caused harm encouraged but not forced
+- Community members choose engagement
+- Can pause or leave at any time
+- Different participation levels available
+
+**When Someone Declines**
+Process may continue focusing on:
+- Support for those harmed
+- Community education and prevention
+- Systemic changes to prevent future harm
+- Transformation work with willing participants
+- Community accountability even without direct participation
+
+### Section 7: Deliberation Process
+
+**Multiple Formats**
+Process uses various formats:
+- Large group dialogue sessions
+- One-on-one conversations
+- Small group discussions
+- Writing and reflection
+- Artistic expression
+- Action and practice
+
+**Trauma-Informed Pacing**
+- Respects different healing timelines
+- Allows breaks and pauses
+- No rushing toward resolution
+- Honors that transformation takes time
+- Regular check-ins on pacing
+
+**Participants**
+May include:
+- Core participants (harmed, harm-doer)
+- Support people for all parties
+- Facilitation team members
+- Community stakeholders
+- Witnesses and those impacted
+- Content experts (when needed)
+
+### Section 8: Solution-Building
+
+**Structured Brainstorming**
+Through facilitated process, identify solutions at multiple levels:
+- **Individual healing** - What does person harmed need?
+- **Individual accountability** - What work must harm-doer do?
+- **Relationship repair** - Can/should relationship be rebuilt?
+- **Community education** - What does community need to learn?
+- **Systemic change** - What structures need transformation?
+
+**Addressing Multiple Levels**
+Effective transformative justice includes:
+- Immediate safety and support
+- Personal transformation work
+- Relationship healing (if possible/desired)
+- Community education and awareness
+- Policy and practice changes
+- Cultural shift in community norms
+
+### Section 9: Decision-Making and Agreements
+
+**Consensus-Based**
+Decisions prioritize those most impacted:
+- Person harmed has most weight
+- Others consent to support plans
+- Creative, multi-faceted agreements
+- Flexible and revisable over time
+
+**Types of Commitments**
+Agreements often include:
+
+*For person who caused harm:*
+- Education and learning (workshops, reading, mentorship)
+- Therapy or counseling
+- Behavioral changes with accountability
+- Restitution or repair actions
+- Community service
+- Regular check-ins with accountability team
+
+*For community:*
+- Policy changes
+- Educational programming
+- Resource allocation
+- Cultural norm shifting
+- Support structures for prevention
+
+*For those harmed:*
+- Healing resources and support
+- Safety measures
+- Decision-making power over process
+- Community accountability to their needs
+
+### Section 10: Implementation and Accountability
+
+**Long-Term Commitment**
+Transformation requires time:
+- Process may span months or years
+- Regular check-ins and adjustments
+- Sustained community engagement
+- Resources for long-term support
+- Celebrating progress while maintaining accountability
+
+**Accountability Structures**
+Include:
+- Regular reporting to accountability team
+- Observable behavioral changes
+- Community witness and support
+- Consequences for non-compliance (decided by those harmed)
+- Repair of trust over time
+
+**When Commitments Aren't Met**
+If person doesn't follow through:
+- Facilitation team addresses with person
+- Support team explores barriers
+- May adjust expectations or timeline
+- Those harmed decide on consequences
+- May include separation from community
+
+### Section 11: Extending Timeline and Process Evolution
+
+**Flexible Timeline**
+Process adapts as needed:
+- May extend timeline for transformation work
+- Can bring in additional expertise
+- Might adapt focus while maintaining goals
+- Responds to changing circumstances
+- Honors that healing isn't linear
+
+**Specialist Support**
+May bring in specialists for:
+- Trauma counseling
+- Addiction support
+- Mental health expertise
+- Cultural or language support
+- Legal advice
+- Youth or elder-specific support
+
+### Section 12: Reconsideration and Follow-Up
+
+**Structured Reassessment**
+Process revisited when:
+- Agreements not being implemented
+- New information emerges about harm
+- Harm recurs or patterns continue
+- More support needed
+- Ready for next phase of work
+
+**Follow-Up Process**
+Includes:
+- Review of original agreements
+- Assessment of what's working
+- Identification of implementation gaps
+- Adjustment of expectations or support
+- Recognition of growth and change
+- Planning next phases
+
+### Section 13: Information Sharing and Privacy
+
+**Consent-Based Sharing**
+Information shared based on:
+- Explicit consent of those involved
+- Need for safety of community
+- Supporting accountability
+- Educational value for community
+- Always protecting most impacted
+
+**Community Learning**
+While protecting individuals:
+- Pattern-level data shared for prevention
+- Educational materials developed from learnings
+- Community workshops on prevention
+- De-identified case studies (with consent)
+- Building community capacity
+
+**Record Keeping**
+Bot maintains:
+- Process timeline and phases
+- Agreements and commitments
+- Check-in schedules
+- Accountability tracking
+- Resources and referrals
+- Consent documentation
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Notes for Bot
+
+When supporting transformative justice process:
+
+1. **Hold complexity** - Multiple timelines, participants, and goals
+2. **Center most impacted** - Prioritize needs of those harmed
+3. **Track accountability** - Support long-term commitment tracking
+4. **Respect consent** - All information sharing requires permission
+5. **Support facilitation** - Coordinate logistics for complex process
+6. **Connect resources** - Link to community support and expertise
+7. **Long-term view** - Transformation takes time, support sustained engagement
+8. **Learn and adapt** - Use patterns to prevent future harm
+
+This process works best when:
+- Community committed to root cause transformation
+- Resources available for long-term support
+- Skilled facilitation teams in place
+- Analysis of systems of oppression included
+- Focus on liberation, not just resolution
+- Community willing to change itself
+- State alternatives needed/desired