Implement LLM-driven governance architecture with structured memory

This commit completes the transition to a pure LLM-driven agentic
governance system with no hard-coded governance logic.

Core Architecture Changes:
- Add structured memory system (memory.py) for tracking governance processes
- Add LLM tools (tools.py) for deterministic operations (math, dates, random)
- Add audit trail system (audit.py) for human-readable decision explanations
- Add LLM-driven agent (agent_refactored.py) that interprets constitution

Documentation:
- Add ARCHITECTURE.md describing process-centric design
- Add ARCHITECTURE_EXAMPLE.md with complete workflow walkthrough
- Update README.md to reflect current LLM-driven architecture
- Simplify constitution.md to benevolent dictator model for testing

Templates:
- Add 8 governance templates (petition, consensus, do-ocracy, jury, etc.)
- Add 8 dispute resolution templates
- All templates work with generic process-based architecture

Key Design Principles:
- "Process" is central abstraction (not "proposal")
- No hard-coded process types or thresholds
- LLM interprets constitution to understand governance rules
- Tools ensure correctness for calculations
- Complete auditability with reasoning and citations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

templates/dispute-resolution/facilitation-council.md

@@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
+# Facilitation Council Dispute Resolution
+
+*A structured process with a trained council of facilitators who manage the dispute resolution process*
+
+This dispute resolution protocol can be integrated into any governance constitution as an article on conflict resolution.
+
+---
+
+## Article: Dispute Resolution
+
+### Section 1: Principles and Values
+
+**Core Values**
+This community centers on:
+- **Equity** - Fair treatment and process for all parties
+- **Transparency** - Clear procedures and documented decisions
+- **Restorative justice** - Focus on repair rather than punishment
+- **Collective decision-making** - Multiple facilitators bring diverse perspectives
+- **Restorative dialogue** - Communication that heals and rebuilds
+
+**The Council Approach**
+Panel-based facilitation provides:
+- Multiple perspectives on each case
+- Balanced decision-making
+- Diverse skills and backgrounds
+- Reduced individual bias
+- Consistent application of standards
+
+**Documentation**
+- Rules and protocols in searchable online database
+- Version history tracked
+- Physical copies at community center library
+- Regular updates communicated
+- Bot maintains current version
+
+### Section 2: The Facilitation Council
+
+**Council Composition**
+The council consists of:
+- 9-15 trained facilitators
+- Diverse backgrounds and perspectives
+- Rotating service terms (2 years)
+- Staggered terms for continuity
+- Community nominates and approves members
+
+**Council Member Qualifications**
+Facilitators must have:
+- Completed comprehensive training program
+- Understanding of community values
+- Conflict resolution skills
+- Demonstrated impartiality
+- Active community participation
+- Good standing in community
+
+**Training Requirements**
+Council training includes:
+- Restorative justice principles
+- Facilitation techniques
+- Community constitution and values
+- Cultural competency
+- Trauma-informed practices
+- Evidence evaluation
+- Decision-making frameworks
+- Bot system use
+
+**Council Governance**
+- Council elects coordinating committee (3 members)
+- Coordinator handles case assignment
+- Regular council meetings for learning and consistency
+- Annual review and improvement
+- Bot supports coordination
+
+### Section 3: Information Access Model
+
+**Three-Tier System**
+Information shared based on role:
+
+**Tier 1 - Full Access:**
+- Involved parties
+- Assigned council panel members
+- Access to all case materials and deliberations
+
+**Tier 2 - Anonymized Tracking:**
+- Council administrators
+- Process tracking without identifying details
+- Patterns and statistics
+
+**Tier 3 - Quarterly Reports:**
+- Broader community
+- Anonymized summaries
+- No identifying details
+- Trends and learnings
+
+### Section 4: Initiating the Process
+
+**Formal Intake**
+Initiated via:
+- Online form submission to @govbot
+- Hard copy form at community center
+- Both include same information fields
+- Accessible formats available
+
+**Intake Form Contents**
+Requesting party provides:
+- All parties involved
+- Description of dispute
+- Timeline of events
+- Previous resolution attempts
+- Desired outcomes
+- Any safety concerns
+- Evidence or documentation
+
+**Council Acknowledgment**
+Within 24 hours:
+- Council acknowledges receipt
+- Assigns intake coordinator
+- Initial assessment begins
+- Parties notified of next steps
+
+**Coordinator Contact**
+Within 48 hours:
+- Intake coordinator contacts all parties
+- Explains process in detail
+- Answers questions
+- Schedules initial interviews
+- Provides process timeline
+
+### Section 5: Panel Assignment
+
+**Panel Size**
+For each case, panel of 2-3 council members:
+- **2 members** - Routine disputes
+- **3 members** - Complex cases or serious matters
+- Coordinator determines based on initial assessment
+
+**Selection Criteria**
+Panel members selected for:
+- Availability for full process
+- Relevant expertise if needed
+- Diversity of perspectives
+- No conflicts of interest
+- Balanced backgrounds
+
+**Lead Facilitator**
+One panel member designated as lead:
+- Primary coordinator of process
+- Leads sessions and deliberations
+- Main point of contact
+- Ensures process integrity
+- Supported by other panel members
+
+### Section 6: Process Ground Rules
+
+**Talking Piece Protocol**
+Council uses structured communication:
+- Talking piece indicates who has floor
+- Passed in intentional order
+- Speaker cannot be interrupted
+- Can pass without speaking
+- Slows conversation for reflection
+- Ensures all voices heard
+
+**Additional Ground Rules**
+All participants commit to:
+- Structured speaking order
+- Time limits respected
+- Direct communication when productive
+- Listening without planning response
+- Focus on resolution
+- Confidentiality of process details
+- Respect for all parties
+
+**Facilitator Authority**
+Panel has authority to:
+- Enforce ground rules
+- Manage time and process
+- Pause for cooling off
+- Request additional information
+- Modify process as needed
+- Make final determination
+
+### Section 7: Assessment Phase
+
+**Structured Assessment**
+Panel conducts thorough review through:
+- Individual interviews with each party
+- Written statements from parties
+- Witness consultation if relevant
+- Review of documentation
+- Analysis using formal framework
+
+**Assessment Framework**
+Panel examines:
+- Facts agreed upon and disputed
+- Applicable community standards
+- Context and history
+- Impact on individuals and community
+- Underlying interests and needs
+- Power dynamics at play
+- Potential for resolution
+
+**Jurisdiction Determination**
+Checklist-based assessment:
+- Falls within community authority?
+- Appropriate for council process?
+- Safety concerns requiring escalation?
+- Legal violations needing referral?
+- Resources adequate for resolution?
+
+**Referral Criteria**
+Cases with serious legal violations or safety threats:
+- Referred to appropriate authorities
+- Council may run parallel process
+- Safety prioritized
+- Community standards still applied
+
+### Section 8: Handling Non-Participation
+
+**Participation Requirements**
+- Required for active community members
+- Voluntary for non-members
+- Non-participation has consequences
+- Process may proceed without party
+
+**Modified Process**
+If party refuses participation:
+- Council proceeds with available information
+- Decision may be made in absentia
+- Limited remedies possible
+- Non-participating party informed
+- May affect their community standing
+
+**Encouraging Participation**
+Panel makes efforts to:
+- Understand barriers to participation
+- Address concerns about process
+- Offer accommodations
+- Explain importance and consequences
+- Provide support if needed
+
+### Section 9: Deliberation Process
+
+**Information Gathering**
+Predetermined schedule for:
+- **Statements** - Each party presents (30-45 min)
+- **Clarifying questions** - Panel and parties ask questions
+- **Witness testimony** - If relevant and requested
+- **Evidence review** - Documents, records, communications
+- **Standards review** - Applicable policies and precedents
+
+**Deliberation Format**
+Multi-stage structure:
+- Most cases involve 3-5 sessions
+- Sessions are 2-3 hours each
+- Spread over 2-4 week period
+- Allows time for reflection
+- Parties and panel have breaks between sessions
+
+**Additional Voices**
+Process includes:
+- **Primary parties** - Central to all sessions
+- **Council panel members** - Guide and decide
+- **Invited witnesses** - Provide specific information
+- **Support persons** - Emotional support for parties (with permission)
+- **Community representatives** - When case affects broader community
+
+### Section 10: Resolution Process
+
+**Tiered Approach**
+Panel prioritizes in order:
+
+**First: Facilitated Consensus**
+- Panel helps parties reach mutual agreement
+- Most preferred outcome
+- Parties control their resolution
+- Panel guides and supports
+
+**Second: Council Recommendations**
+- If consensus not reached
+- Panel proposes resolution
+- Strong recommendations to parties
+- Parties encouraged to accept
+
+**Third: Binding Decisions**
+- When needed for community protection
+- Panel makes final determination
+- Binding on all parties
+- Used sparingly
+
+**Decision-Making Within Panel**
+Panel decisions require:
+- Discussion until consensus reached
+- If consensus not possible, majority vote
+- Dissenting opinions noted
+- Lead facilitator breaks ties (if 2-person panel)
+
+### Section 11: Resolution Outcomes
+
+**Types of Outcomes**
+Council may determine:
+- Findings of fact
+- Responsibility determinations
+- Behavioral requirements
+- Restitution or repair actions
+- Boundary setting
+- Relationship agreements
+- Community service
+- Policy recommendations
+- Apologies or acknowledgments
+
+**Written Decision**
+Panel provides comprehensive document:
+- Summary of dispute
+- Process followed
+- Evidence considered
+- Standards applied
+- Determination and reasoning
+- Specific requirements
+- Implementation timeline
+- Follow-up plan
+
+**Decision Communication**
+- Provided to all parties
+- Submitted to @govbot
+- Anonymized summary to community
+- Implementation coordinator notified
+- Appeals information included
+
+### Section 12: Implementation and Follow-Up
+
+**Monitoring Compliance**
+- Implementation coordinator tracks
+- Regular check-ins with parties
+- Bot sends automated reminders
+- Progress reported to panel
+- Support provided as needed
+
+**Follow-Up Sessions**
+Scheduled as needed for:
+- Checking agreement implementation
+- Addressing emerging concerns
+- Supporting relationship repair
+- Celebrating progress
+- Modifying agreements if circumstances change
+
+**Non-Compliance**
+If requirements not met:
+- Coordinator reaches out
+- Understands barriers
+- Panel reconvenes if needed
+- May modify requirements
+- Escalate to governance if willful refusal
+
+### Section 13: When Resolution Fails
+
+**Alternative Pathways**
+Panel may recommend:
+- **Specialized mediators** - For deep interpersonal conflicts
+- **Governance escalation** - For policy questions
+- **Professional services** - Therapy, legal advice, etc.
+- **Legal resources** - When appropriate
+- **Separation protocols** - If co-existence not possible
+- **Interim measures** - To stabilize situation
+
+**Partial Resolution**
+Sometimes full resolution not possible:
+- Panel addresses what can be resolved
+- Provides clarity on what remains
+- Suggests next steps
+- Documents progress made
+- Maintains safety and boundaries
+
+### Section 14: Appeals Process
+
+**Appeal Criteria**
+Appeals accepted for:
+- New evidence not previously available
+- Procedural errors affecting outcome
+- Agreements proving unworkable
+- Changed circumstances requiring revision
+- Evidence of panel bias
+
+**Filing Requirements**
+Within 30 days of decision:
+- Submit appeal to council via @govbot
+- Explain specific grounds
+- Provide supporting documentation
+- Propose alternative outcome
+
+**Appeal Review**
+New panel assigned:
+- Different members than original
+- Reviews appeal against criteria
+- Conducts limited-scope hearing if needed
+- Decides: affirm, modify, overturn, or remand
+- Decision within 30 days of acceptance
+
+**Appeal Outcomes**
+Appeal panel may:
+- Affirm original decision
+- Modify specific elements
+- Overturn and decide differently
+- Remand for new process
+- Provide clarification
+
+### Section 15: Council Learning and Improvement
+
+**Case Review**
+Council regularly reviews:
+- Patterns across cases
+- Process effectiveness
+- Consistency in application
+- Areas for improvement
+- Training needs
+
+**Community Reporting**
+Quarterly reports include:
+- Number and types of cases
+- Resolution outcomes
+- Process timelines
+- Trends and patterns
+- Anonymized learnings
+
+**Continuous Improvement**
+Council commits to:
+- Annual process review
+- Incorporating feedback
+- Updating training
+- Refining procedures
+- Community input on changes
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Notes for Bot
+
+When supporting facilitation council process:
+
+1. **Coordination hub** - Manage complex logistics of panels, parties, and sessions
+2. **Information management** - Implement three-tier access appropriately
+3. **Timeline tracking** - Multi-session processes over weeks
+4. **Panel support** - Provide facilitators with tools and documentation
+5. **Implementation monitoring** - Track compliance with decisions
+6. **Pattern analysis** - Help council learn from cases
+7. **Community reporting** - Generate quarterly anonymized summaries
+
+This process works best when:
+- Multiple facilitators bring diverse perspectives
+- Complex cases need structured but flexible process
+- Community values both thoroughness and efficiency
+- Restorative outcomes prioritized
+- Strong facilitator training in place
+- Time available for multi-session deliberation