106 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
106 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
layout: post
|
||
author: Cassandra Dana
|
||
title: "The Quiet Media Revolution in Longmont"
|
||
summary: 'Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
|
||
access television.'
|
||
tags: [stakeholder-news, shared-ownership-in-colorado]
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
When the *Longmont Observer* responded to a request-for-proposals for control over the
|
||
city's public access channels, the team wasn't sure they'd win. The contract
|
||
had been held by another organization for over 30 years, and most
|
||
assumed it was unlikely to change hands. But the *Observer* presented an
|
||
unusual idea, one that sparked imaginations by proposing to reconfigure
|
||
notions of media ownership.
|
||
|
||
If you walk into one of Longmont Public Media's (the *Observer*'s public
|
||
access branch) community organizing meetings you'll find 20 to 30
|
||
enthusiastic individuals happy to greet you and excited to work. Whether
|
||
its gathered around a small table in their office, or in the back room
|
||
of the local coffee shop, the energy of this eclectic group is palpable.
|
||
Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
|
||
access television.
|
||
|
||
The notion of public access television was devised in the late 1960s and
|
||
early 1970s. In the era of the first televised war NBC, CBS and ABC
|
||
controlled broadcast coverage of the cultural, political and social
|
||
conflict. They depicted the gruesome fighting over seas and the civil
|
||
unrest here in the United States. The effects were extraordinary. Screen
|
||
media began to have a major influence on public policy and mass
|
||
upheaval. TV began to be seen as a uniquely powerful force; one that was
|
||
dictated by commercial broadcast networks. Recognizing the power of the
|
||
medium, counterculture movements and media scholars began to advocate
|
||
for what was referred to as "Guerrilla Television." Michael Shamberg
|
||
pioneered the term in 1971 stating, "Guerrilla Television is grassroots
|
||
television. It works with the people, not from above them."[^1]
|
||
|
||
Recognizing the importance of community driven media, the FCC developed
|
||
regulations authorizing state and local governments to require cable
|
||
television networks to set aside channels for public access. Cable
|
||
companies entered franchise agreements with municipalities in which
|
||
access to infrastructure (telephone poles, sidewalks, etc.) was granted
|
||
in exchange for 5 percent of companies' gross revenue. This franchise
|
||
fee was paid to the city, which often reinvested this money into public
|
||
access. Initially many local municipalities adopted this model granting
|
||
community members access to production and distribution methods.
|
||
However, as pressure for public access decreased and many municipalities
|
||
began experiencing increased financial burdens. Funding for public
|
||
access became less feasible. Some communities shut down public access
|
||
channels entirely while others limited them to local legislative
|
||
proceedings. Public access shifted from a place where community members
|
||
could develop skills and exhibit ideas to a droning of traffic court and
|
||
city council hearings.
|
||
|
||
To complicate the matter further, in August 2019 the FCC approved an
|
||
amendment to their 1970s regulation. The change in legislation allows
|
||
cable companies to deduct "in-kind provisions" from their franchise
|
||
fees. This means cable companies can now assert that the market value of
|
||
public access networks (the value of the channel) can be deducted from
|
||
the revenue they pay to the municipalities. In 2017 Longmont allocated
|
||
25 percent of the franchise fees collected from Comcast (or \$187,924)
|
||
to public access television. According to the Colorado Sun, that is
|
||
enough funding to cover one full-time employee and two part-time
|
||
employees[^2]. The diminishment of franchise fees will seriously impact
|
||
the ability of cities and states to maintain public access television.
|
||
President of Rocky Mountain PBS told the Colorado Sun, "Going from
|
||
having franchise fees to not having them, typically what happens in that
|
||
case is the public access goes away." It's clear that new models must be
|
||
developed in order to maintain public access.
|
||
|
||
Longmont Public Media has taken on the challenge of innovating public
|
||
access. They have suggested that public access television can truly
|
||
function as it was intended; as a resource created for and by the
|
||
masses. They have proposed a cooperative model of media ownership in
|
||
which members pay a small fee and in exchange can produce and exhibit
|
||
their work. The studio that houses Longmont Public Access will be
|
||
transformed into a media makerspace, serving as a venue for community
|
||
members to create, collaborate, share infrastructure and distribute
|
||
work. Each member of the co-op contributes to ideas around governance,
|
||
programming, events and space utilization. As Michael Shamberg explained
|
||
when he was innovating public access, "The inherent potential of
|
||
information technology can restore democracy in America if people become
|
||
skilled with information tools.[^3]"
|
||
|
||
This is not Longmont's first foray into municipal ownership of community
|
||
media. In 2014 Longmont launched NextLight, a municipally owned
|
||
broadband enterprise. NextLight has dethroned Google Fiber as the
|
||
fastest fiber-optic network, and is now a national model for publically
|
||
owned internet access. Five years later Longmont is building on this
|
||
precedent through the creation of Longmont Public Media.
|
||
|
||
When Longmont Public Media asked MEDLab to get involved——to help
|
||
formulate this model of cooperative public access——I knew it was an
|
||
opportunity not to be missed. Thursday nights have become one of my
|
||
favorite parts of the week; when I slide past the local middle school
|
||
choir and the couples quietly nestled sipping lattes to the back room of
|
||
the local coffee shop where we work to revolutionize media ownership.
|
||
|
||
[^1]: Shamberg, Michael & Raindance Corporation. *Guerrilla
|
||
Television*. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, 1971.
|
||
|
||
[^2]: https://coloradosun.com/2019/02/11/cable-franchise-fee-limit-public-access-channels/
|
||
|
||
[^3]: Shamberg, Michael & Raindance Corporation. *Guerrilla
|
||
Television*. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, 1971.
|