Browse Source

Longmont post draft, needs editing

Nathan Schneider 4 years ago
parent
commit
b4d07ca455
1 changed files with 105 additions and 0 deletions
  1. 105 0
      _posts/2019-12-19-quiet-media-revolution-longmont.md

+ 105 - 0
_posts/2019-12-19-quiet-media-revolution-longmont.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+---
+layout: post
+author: Cassandra Dana
+title: "The Quiet Media Revolution in Longmont"
+summary: 'Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
+access television.'
+tags: [stakeholder-news, shared-ownership-in-colorado]
+---
+
+When the *Longmont Observer* responded to a request-for-proposals for control over the
+city's public access channels, the team wasn't sure they'd win. The contract
+had been held by another organization for over 30 years, and most
+assumed it was unlikely to change hands. But the *Observer* presented an
+unusual idea, one that sparked imaginations by proposing to reconfigure
+notions of media ownership.
+
+If you walk into one of Longmont Public Media's (the *Observer*'s public
+access branch) community organizing meetings you'll find 20 to 30
+enthusiastic individuals happy to greet you and excited to work. Whether
+its gathered around a small table in their office, or in the back room
+of the local coffee shop, the energy of this eclectic group is palpable.
+Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
+access television.
+
+The notion of public access television was devised in the late 1960s and
+early 1970s. In the era of the first televised war NBC, CBS and ABC
+controlled broadcast coverage of the cultural, political and social
+conflict. They depicted the gruesome fighting over seas and the civil
+unrest here in the United States. The effects were extraordinary. Screen
+media began to have a major influence on public policy and mass
+upheaval. TV began to be seen as a uniquely powerful force; one that was
+dictated by commercial broadcast networks. Recognizing the power of the
+medium, counterculture movements and media scholars began to advocate
+for what was referred to as "Guerrilla Television." Michael Shamberg
+pioneered the term in 1971 stating, "Guerrilla Television is grassroots
+television. It works with the people, not from above them."[^1]
+
+Recognizing the importance of community driven media, the FCC developed
+regulations authorizing state and local governments to require cable
+television networks to set aside channels for public access. Cable
+companies entered franchise agreements with municipalities in which
+access to infrastructure (telephone poles, sidewalks, etc.) was granted
+in exchange for 5 percent of companies' gross revenue. This franchise
+fee was paid to the city, which often reinvested this money into public
+access. Initially many local municipalities adopted this model granting
+community members access to production and distribution methods.
+However, as pressure for public access decreased and many municipalities
+began experiencing increased financial burdens. Funding for public
+access became less feasible. Some communities shut down public access
+channels entirely while others limited them to local legislative
+proceedings. Public access shifted from a place where community members
+could develop skills and exhibit ideas to a droning of traffic court and
+city council hearings.
+
+To complicate the matter further, in August 2019 the FCC approved an
+amendment to their 1970s regulation. The change in legislation allows
+cable companies to deduct "in-kind provisions" from their franchise
+fees. This means cable companies can now assert that the market value of
+public access networks (the value of the channel) can be deducted from
+the revenue they pay to the municipalities. In 2017 Longmont allocated
+25 percent of the franchise fees collected from Comcast (or \$187,924)
+to public access television. According to the Colorado Sun, that is
+enough funding to cover one full-time employee and two part-time
+employees[^2]. The diminishment of franchise fees will seriously impact
+the ability of cities and states to maintain public access television.
+President of Rocky Mountain PBS told the Colorado Sun, "Going from
+having franchise fees to not having them, typically what happens in that
+case is the public access goes away." It's clear that new models must be
+developed in order to maintain public access.
+
+Longmont Public Media has taken on the challenge of innovating public
+access. They have suggested that public access television can truly
+function as it was intended; as a resource created for and by the
+masses. They have proposed a cooperative model of media ownership in
+which members pay a small fee and in exchange can produce and exhibit
+their work. The studio that houses Longmont Public Access will be
+transformed into a media makerspace, serving as a venue for community
+members to create, collaborate, share infrastructure and distribute
+work. Each member of the co-op contributes to ideas around governance,
+programming, events and space utilization. As Michael Shamberg explained
+when he was innovating public access, "The inherent potential of
+information technology can restore democracy in America if people become
+skilled with information tools.[^3]"
+
+This is not Longmont's first foray into municipal ownership of community
+media. In 2014 Longmont launched NextLight, a municipally owned
+broadband enterprise. NextLight has dethroned Google Fiber as the
+fastest fiber-optic network, and is now a national model for publically
+owned internet access. Five years later Longmont is building on this
+precedent through the creation of Longmont Public Media.
+
+When Longmont Public Media asked MEDLab to get involved——to help
+formulate this model of cooperative public access——I knew it was an
+opportunity not to be missed. Thursday nights have become one of my
+favorite parts of the week; when I slide past the local middle school
+choir and the couples quietly nestled sipping lattes to the back room of
+the local coffee shop where we work to revolutionize media ownership.
+
+[^1]: Shamberg, Michael & Raindance Corporation.  *Guerrilla
+    Television*. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, 1971.
+
+[^2]: https://coloradosun.com/2019/02/11/cable-franchise-fee-limit-public-access-channels/
+
+[^3]: Shamberg, Michael & Raindance Corporation.  *Guerrilla
+    Television*. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, 1971.