adilalloandCursor
bcbc6f30d9
The real-group profiles stay as a test, so a change that moves a pick fails. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
22 lines
1.4 KiB
JSON
22 lines
1.4 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"about": "Proposed and not applied. Mark changes the engine run suggested for the marks sign-off. M2 left this file on 2 November 2026. It was decided on 30 October (D7) and is now in the conflict facets and _jobs.json, with Regular debriefs first in the prevention job. M1 stays here unapplied, since it is not applied at launch (D6, 30 October). engine/results/worked-examples.md shows the picks with and without it.",
|
|
"fixes": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "M1",
|
|
"deck": "membership",
|
|
"card": "owners-and-staff",
|
|
"set": {
|
|
"orgType": {
|
|
"workersCoop": true
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"traits": {
|
|
"fits": [
|
|
"nonvoters"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"why": "The card says worker-owners are the owners in a worker co-op, but only for-profits are marked, so under one main kind no co-op gets it. The review's worked examples gave it to co-ops whose workers do not all own. This mark does that only if the pay answer also comes off the card, because its help line tells co-ops to tick it for worker-owners on payroll, so this revisits one cell of the 24 Oct table. It then moves 40 of the 47 co-ops in the profiles, 26 because some who work there do not vote and 14 only because they also ticked for-profit, which breaks the tie. Without it, co-ops keep Equal membership and get A voice for people without a vote beside it when some who work there do not vote."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|