Import the remade decks on stable ids and recommend one card per job, so a saved draft still loads after a chip is renamed.

The real-group profiles stay as a test, so a change that moves a pick fails.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

tests/components/FinalReviewPage.test.tsx

@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ function FinalReviewWithCustomizeSelections() {
         { id: "2", label: "Accountability", state: "unselected" },
       ],
       selectedCommunicationMethodIds: ["signal"],
-      selectedMembershipMethodIds: ["open-access"],
+      selectedMembershipMethodIds: ["open-admission"],
       selectedDecisionApproachIds: ["lazy-consensus"],
-      selectedConflictManagementIds: ["peer-mediation"],
+      selectedConflictManagementIds: ["conflict-ladder"],
     });
   }, [replaceState]);
   return <FinalReviewScreen />;
@@ -220,16 +220,39 @@ describe("FinalReviewScreen — prefilled selections", () => {
       expect(screen.getByText("Accessibility")).toBeInTheDocument();
     });
     expect(screen.getByText("Signal")).toBeInTheDocument();
-    expect(screen.getByText("Open Access")).toBeInTheDocument();
-    expect(screen.getByText("Lazy Consensus")).toBeInTheDocument();
-    expect(screen.getByText("Peer Mediation")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(screen.getByText("Open admission")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(screen.getByText("Lazy consensus")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(screen.getByText("Conflict ladder")).toBeInTheDocument();
 
     // Demo chips from `finalReview.json` must not leak through once the
-    // user has real selections: "Open Admission" is shipped as fallback,
-    // while the customize flow resolves to "Open Access".
+    // user has real selections. The fallback still says "Open Admission".
     expect(screen.queryByText("Open Admission")).not.toBeInTheDocument();
     expect(screen.queryByText("Consciousness")).not.toBeInTheDocument();
   });
+
+  it("warns when binding arbitration sits next to a join that records no yes", async () => {
+    function ReviewWithOpenJoinAndArbitration() {
+      const { replaceState } = useCreateFlow();
+      useLayoutEffect(() => {
+        replaceState({
+          title: "Oak Park Commons",
+          selectedMembershipMethodIds: ["open-admission"],
+          selectedConflictManagementIds: ["binding-arbitration"],
+        });
+      }, [replaceState]);
+      return <FinalReviewScreen />;
+    }
+
+    render(<ReviewWithOpenJoinAndArbitration />);
+    expect(
+      await screen.findByText(/Binding arbitration needs each member.s own yes/),
+    ).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(
+      screen.getByText(
+        /Each member still has to agree separately before binding arbitration applies/,
+      ),
+    ).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
 });
 
 describe("FinalReviewScreen — chip detail modal", () => {
@@ -245,7 +268,7 @@ describe("FinalReviewScreen — chip detail modal", () => {
     await waitFor(() => {
       expect(
         screen.getByText(
-          /Encrypted messaging for high-security, private coordination\./i,
+          /encrypted Signal groups/i,
         ),
       ).toBeInTheDocument();
     });
@@ -277,7 +300,7 @@ describe("FinalReviewScreen — chip detail modal", () => {
     );
 
     fireEvent.click(
-      await screen.findByRole("button", { name: catalogChipName("Video Meetings") }),
+      await screen.findByRole("button", { name: catalogChipName("Video meetings") }),
     );
     const dialog = await screen.findByRole("dialog");
     expect(within(dialog).getAllByRole("textbox")).toHaveLength(3);
@@ -1021,9 +1044,9 @@ describe("FinalReviewScreen — chip edit modal save semantics", () => {
           ? (document.getElementById(labelledby)?.textContent ?? "").trim()
           : "";
       });
-    expect(labels[0]).toMatch(/Logistics, Admin/);
-    expect(labels[1]).toMatch(/Code of Conduct/);
-    expect(labels[2]).toMatch(/Core Principle/);
+    expect(labels[0]).toMatch(/How it works/);
+    expect(labels[1]).toMatch(/Norms/);
+    expect(labels[2]).toMatch(/Core principle/);
   });
 });