Import the remade decks on stable ids and recommend one card per job, so a saved draft still loads after a chip is renamed.
The real-group profiles stay as a test, so a change that moves a pick fails. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
96ca15d8e3
commit
bcbc6f30d9
89 files changed
+36555
-2828
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"about": "Pairs whose text contradicts when both are picked. The product can warn and ask the group to edit one. Since 2 November 2026 cards state their own policy instead of naming a shared term, so a card that spells out a default can clash with the card a group picked for that job. Launch accepts these and lists each pair here for the warnings after launch (answer 69).",
|
||||
"pairs": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "equal-membership",
|
||||
"b": "volunteers-and-core-members",
|
||||
"why": "Equal membership gives every member the same rights and one kind of member. Volunteers and core members sets two kinds."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "equal-membership",
|
||||
"b": "member-classes",
|
||||
"why": "Equal membership has one kind of member. Member classes has several, each with its own seats."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "equal-membership",
|
||||
"b": "contributors-and-maintainers",
|
||||
"why": "Equal membership gives everyone the same rights. Maintainers hold rights contributors do not."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "equal-membership",
|
||||
"b": "owners-and-staff",
|
||||
"why": "Equal membership gives everyone the same say. Owners have the final say over staff."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "equal-membership",
|
||||
"b": "membership-by-token",
|
||||
"why": "Equal membership gives one vote each. Votes by token follow holdings."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "volunteers-and-core-members",
|
||||
"b": "member-classes",
|
||||
"why": "Both define kinds of members, in different ways."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "starting-with-one-person",
|
||||
"b": "owners-and-staff",
|
||||
"why": "Starting with one person gives the founder no extra say once others join. Owners and staff keeps the final say with the owners."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "members-approve-new-members",
|
||||
"b": "worker-owner-candidacy",
|
||||
"why": "Both decide who becomes a member. A worker co-op admits worker-owners through candidacy and their own vote."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "membership",
|
||||
"a": "trial-period",
|
||||
"b": "worker-owner-candidacy",
|
||||
"why": "Both set a trial before full membership. Candidacy is a worker co-op's trial."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "conflict-ladder",
|
||||
"b": "conflict-working-group",
|
||||
"why": "Conflict ladder sends step three to two people close to neither person. Conflict working group names two to five members to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "conflict-ladder",
|
||||
"b": "hearing-panel",
|
||||
"why": "Conflict ladder sends step three to two people close to neither person. Hearing panel draws three panelists from an elected pool to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "conflict-ladder",
|
||||
"b": "code-of-conduct-team",
|
||||
"why": "Conflict ladder sends step three to two people close to neither person. Code of conduct team names two to seven people to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "conflict-ladder",
|
||||
"b": "managerial-decision",
|
||||
"why": "Conflict ladder sends step three to two people close to neither person. Managerial decision has the manager hear conflicts about the work of the people they manage."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "graduated-responses",
|
||||
"b": "conflict-working-group",
|
||||
"why": "Graduated responses has two people close to neither person propose a response. Conflict working group names two to five members to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "graduated-responses",
|
||||
"b": "hearing-panel",
|
||||
"why": "Graduated responses has two people close to neither person propose a response. Hearing panel draws three panelists from an elected pool to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "graduated-responses",
|
||||
"b": "code-of-conduct-team",
|
||||
"why": "Graduated responses has two people close to neither person propose a response. Code of conduct team names two to seven people to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "mediation",
|
||||
"b": "conflict-working-group",
|
||||
"why": "When mediation fails, Mediation sends a case to two people named each year to hear conflicts. Conflict working group names two to five members to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "mediation",
|
||||
"b": "hearing-panel",
|
||||
"why": "When mediation fails, Mediation sends a case to two people named each year to hear conflicts. Hearing panel draws three panelists from an elected pool to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "mediation",
|
||||
"b": "code-of-conduct-team",
|
||||
"why": "When mediation fails, Mediation sends a case to two people named each year to hear conflicts. Code of conduct team names two to seven people to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "mediation",
|
||||
"b": "managerial-decision",
|
||||
"why": "When mediation fails, Mediation sends a case to two people named each year to hear conflicts. Managerial decision has the manager hear conflicts about the work of the people they manage."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "precautionary-suspension",
|
||||
"b": "conflict-working-group",
|
||||
"why": "Precautionary suspension names two members each year who can pause someone. Conflict working group names two to five members to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "precautionary-suspension",
|
||||
"b": "hearing-panel",
|
||||
"why": "Precautionary suspension names two members each year who can pause someone. Hearing panel draws three panelists from an elected pool to hear the same cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"deck": "conflictManagement",
|
||||
"a": "precautionary-suspension",
|
||||
"b": "code-of-conduct-team",
|
||||
"why": "Precautionary suspension names two members each year who can pause someone. Code of conduct team names two to seven people to hear the same cases."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user