Added synthetic readings
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Schneider
@@ -2,6 +2,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
This repository is a collection point for data from the [Protocol Bicorder](https://git.medlab.host/ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder) app.
|
||||
|
||||
Be attentive to JSON version numbers, as they are subject to change. The data here include various version numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contents
|
||||
|
||||
* The `readings/` directory includes readings uploaded by users of the Bicorder web app.
|
||||
* The `synthetic_readings/` directory includes readings generated by LLM synthesis as described [here](https://git.medlab.host/ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder/src/branch/main/analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
Data licensed in the public domain.
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/001_Abdication Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/001_Abdication Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Abdication Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Though not formally codified, the King\u2019s abdication represents a deviation from the accepted protocol for royal succession. It marks a departure from the traditional expectation that monarchs serve until death and a disruption of the established system of power transfer. This departure challenged the established norm for royal behavior and demonstrated the possibility of opting out of a predetermined role, albeit with significant consequences. The event served as a striking example of challenging predefined patterns of action.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/002_Abolitionist Practice Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/002_Abolitionist Practice Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Abolitionist Practice Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This is referenced as a method of enacting change that focuses on dismantling systems of oppression and building alternative forms of social organization. It emphasizes creating practices rooted in self-determination and shared struggle. It's a protocol about creating alternatives and taking action in the present, working towards a future free from oppressive structures, and building resilience through reciprocal support.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/003_Access Check-in.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/003_Access Check-in.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access Check-in",
|
||||
"description": "This is a protocol increasingly adopted in collaborative spaces to proactively identify and address participant needs beyond standard accommodations like ASL and captioning. It involves a dedicated portion of a meeting where participants are invited to share their needs and preferences, including fatigue levels or preferences for staying off-camera. This signals a commitment to inclusivity and prioritizes a participant-centered approach to engagement, and aims to foster a more comfortable and accessible environment.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/004_Access Intimacy Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/004_Access Intimacy Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access Intimacy Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This describes a spontaneous and often unarticulated feeling of connection and understanding between individuals related to access needs. It is characterized by an elusive comfort that arises when someone \"gets\" your specific access requirements, often transcending political or shared identity. The protocol is less about a structured process and more about recognizing and appreciating moments of intuitive, reciprocal understanding in the shared experience of disability. Experiencing this protocol can cultivate feelings of safety and validation.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/005_Access-Centered Practices.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/005_Access-Centered Practices.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access-Centered Practices",
|
||||
"description": "In response to ableism within institutional settings during the COVID-19 pandemic, this protocol emphasizes inclusivity and accessibility for individuals with disabilities. It involves modifying communication methods, physical spaces, and programmatic elements to ensure participation for all. Beyond legal requirements, this process represents a move towards dismantling discriminatory practices and centering the experiences of disabled individuals. Ultimately, it highlights the importance of collective responsibility for creating equitable spaces.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/006_ActivityPub Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/006_ActivityPub Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ActivityPub Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "ActivityPub is an open-source protocol designed for decentralized social networking, allowing users to interact across different platforms and maintain greater control over their data and online presence. It enables users to subscribe to content from any server, blocking unwanted users or entire servers, fostering a more customizable and community-driven social experience. The system\u2019s design aimed to address concerns about censorship and platform monopolies, offering users alternatives to centralized social media services. While adoption has faced challenges, it represents a shift towards more user-centric and interoperable online interactions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/007_African Futurist Escape.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/007_African Futurist Escape.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "African Futurist Escape",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol leverages narratives like those of High John and Brerer Rabbit to offer a cartographic pathway towards freedom, utilizing escape as a coping mechanism and reinforcing the belief in the possibility of alternative existences. It involves envisioning and temporarily inhabiting realms beyond the constraints of the present reality, offering solace and hope in times of hardship. The protocol's efficacy lies in its ability to momentarily detach from oppressive conditions and inspire a sense of agency and possibility, ultimately contributing to a reimagining of future prospects.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/008_Afrofuturism.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/008_Afrofuturism.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Afrofuturism",
|
||||
"description": "The protocol of Afrofuturism provides an imaginative pathway to liberation by envisioning futures free from oppression and historical trauma. It employs narratives and artistic expressions that draw upon African and diasporic experiences to explore themes of technology, identity, and possibility. By creating alternate realities and alternative narratives, Afrofuturism offers solace, hope, and the inspiration to challenge constraints, and to navigate challenging times, demonstrating that other ways of being are possible. This process allows individuals to escape the limitations of the present and to envision a brighter, more equitable future.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/009_Airport Security Procedures.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/009_Airport Security Procedures.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Airport Security Procedures",
|
||||
"description": "These procedures represent a structured set of actions and guidelines aimed at enhancing safety and preventing threats within airport environments. The procedures encompass passenger screening, baggage inspections, and security personnel protocols. The actions are designed to mitigate risks and ensure compliance with aviation regulations. These actions influence the travel experience and shape security practices globally.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/010_Alusi Trance (African Futurism).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/010_Alusi Trance (African Futurism).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Alusi Trance (African Futurism)",
|
||||
"description": "Inspired by Nnedi Okorafor's work, this protocol represents a spiritual departure from the physical body, facilitating communication with ancestral spirits and accessing knowledge of the wilderness \u2013 a timeless realm beyond the constraints of the present. It's a temporary transcendence where individuals can connect with wisdom, healing, and guidance from previous generations. The process is deeply rooted in African spiritual traditions and offers a pathway to profound self-discovery and reconnection with cultural heritage.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/011_Ancestral Spirit Possession.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/011_Ancestral Spirit Possession.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Ancestral Spirit Possession",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol signifies a spiritual interaction where the past enters the present through a form of spiritual intervention. It involves a temporary inhabitation or connection with the spirit of an ancestor, often manifesting as a trance state or ecstatic expression. The experience can offer guidance, healing, or knowledge of the future, providing a link to ancestral wisdom. Such encounters blur the boundaries between time and realms, offering a dynamic exchange between generations.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Anishinaabeg Knowledge Sharing Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Traditional methods for sharing knowledge are rooted in the reciprocity and the mutual benefit of community relationships. Elders and knowledge-keepers pass down information, teachings, and skills to younger generations using storytelling, observation, and hands-on experiences. These shared methods aim to build strong community bonds, respect ancestral knowledge, and ensure the transmission of cultural heritage. They promote intergenerational connection and foster a sense of continuity.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/013_Anishinaabeg Visiting Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/013_Anishinaabeg Visiting Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Anishinaabeg Visiting Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Traditional Anishinaabeg protocols outline respectful ways to visit and engage with community members, emphasizing reciprocity and mutual benefit. These protocols guide interactions, emphasizing a deep respect for the host\u2019s space and perspective, which prioritizes building strong, lasting relationships. The protocols underscore a shared responsibility to uphold the community\u2019s values and ensure that interactions are positive and enriching for all involved. They demonstrate a model of interaction that centers care, listening, and honoring ancestral knowledge.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/014_Annual Feasts.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/014_Annual Feasts.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Annual Feasts",
|
||||
"description": "Recurring celebrations marking significant events or seasons, annual feasts provide a framework for community gatherings and shared experiences. These scheduled events reinforce cultural values and offer opportunities for communal storytelling and artistic expression. The predictable nature of the feast fosters a sense of continuity and strengthens bonds between individuals and generations. Essentially, they structure shared time and reinforce collective identity.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/015_Arendt's Reporting Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/015_Arendt's Reporting Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Arendt's Reporting Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Hannah Arendt's approach to reporting on the Eichmann trial involved meticulous reliance on available materials and a critical assessment of their reliability. She analyzed trial records, police interrogations, and press accounts, recognizing potential inaccuracies in the German translations. Arendt\u2019s reporting also emphasized the limited and specific audience present at the trial, and her critique of the trial's framework and its handling of public spectacle. Her overall method aimed to provide an objective account of the proceedings while also critiquing its political and performative aspects.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/016_ARPANET Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/016_ARPANET Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ARPANET Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "These are the initial protocols utilized by the ARPANET, representing a foundational set of rules for early network communication. They were instrumental in demonstrating the feasibility of packet switching and networked data transfer, laying the groundwork for the internet's architecture. While superseded by more advanced protocols, the ARPANET protocols remain significant for their historical role in shaping modern networking concepts. They embody the pioneering efforts to establish reliable data transmission over a distributed network.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/017_Arranged Marriage.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/017_Arranged Marriage.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Arranged Marriage",
|
||||
"description": "While not explicitly detailed, arranged marriage is implied as an alternative to modern dating protocols. In this traditional practice, families take the lead in selecting partners for their children, often based on social, economic, and familial compatibility. The protocol bypasses individual choice and romantic attraction, prioritizing long-term stability and community cohesion. It represents a stark contrast to the autonomous and often superficial nature of modern dating.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Art Historical/Curatorial Validation Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Museum staff and scholars engage in a validation protocol, a reciprocal system through which art historians seek acknowledgement from curators and curators seek it from historians. A curator\u2019s validation comes through public recognition for a successful exhibition, while a historian's comes from the credibility gained from published works. This often fosters competition and a subtle power dynamic between these critical figures in the art world.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/019_Artisanal Marketing Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/019_Artisanal Marketing Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Artisanal Marketing Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This tactic is utilized when organizations attempt to add value to products or processes that are becoming anachronistic. Rather than streamlining or phasing out older methods, these are rebranded as \u2018artisanal\u2019 to evoke a sense of craftsmanship, quality, and exclusivity. The method allows for the preservation of legacy practices while capitalizing on consumer preferences for authenticity and unique experiences. It effectively masks a decline in productivity or relevance by attributing value to the historical context of production.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/020_Artistic Collaboration.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/020_Artistic Collaboration.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Artistic Collaboration",
|
||||
"description": "The Invisible Borders road trips exemplified a collaborative artistic model where photographers and writers worked together, fostering an environment of mutual learning and shared creative responsibility. This group dynamic encouraged open dialogue, diverse perspectives, and a collective exploration of artistic themes. The process underscored the importance of recognizing the perspectives of others and how collaboration can enrich the creative process.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/021_ASL Provision Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/021_ASL Provision Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ASL Provision Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol outlines steps for providing sign language interpretation, aiming to ensure accessibility for Deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. It recommends providing interpreters who share cultural or racial identities with the audience or artists, supplying scripts or written materials for pre-event preparation, and encouraging slower speech and pauses during events. The protocol also advises reserving visible seating and requesting introductions by name to facilitate communication effectively. Beyond these technicalities, the protocol encourages building relationships within the Deaf community to enhance its impact.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/022_Audience Recording Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/022_Audience Recording Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Audience Recording Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Records of audiences with the emperor were integral to the Cabinet Office's procedures and were meticulously documented within the minute books. These records detailed the circumstances of the imperial review, including the nature of the presented material and any observations or reactions from the emperor. The meticulous logging of audience details served to create a traceable history of the decision-making process and demonstrated accountability within the system. This formalized the imperial involvement and ensured a consistent record of the reviewed materials.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Authority Assertions via Linguistic Precision",
|
||||
"description": "Speakers emphasize meticulous vocabulary and phraseology to assert intellectual authority and signal their mastery of the subject matter. This involves using precise terminology and avoiding ambiguity, even when simpler language might suffice. The deliberate use of complex language functions as a subtle form of signaling, indicating expertise and demanding respect from other participants. It also serves to create a sense of exclusivity and reinforce the speaker's position as a knowledgeable leader.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/024_Automobile Driver Warning Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/024_Automobile Driver Warning Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Automobile Driver Warning Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Drivers often utilize standardized signals, such as turn signals, horn use, or hand gestures, to communicate intentions to other drivers and pedestrians. These signals serve as vital indicators of planned movements or potential hazards, helping to prevent accidents and maintain traffic flow. They are typically unstated but rely on a shared understanding of road safety norms and signaling conventions among drivers. These protocols can sometimes fail due to limited visibility, distraction, or misinterpretation, leading to collisions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/025_Autonomous Worlds (0xPARC framework).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/025_Autonomous Worlds (0xPARC framework).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Autonomous Worlds (0xPARC framework)",
|
||||
"description": "0xPARC's concept of Autonomous Worlds envisions blockchain-based game environments with inherent properties of persistence and player-driven development. These worlds are characterized by spatial reasoning, territorialism, and a shared understanding of rulesets. Unlike traditional games, Autonomous Worlds strive for a degree of self-governance and continuous evolution based on player interactions. The framework emphasizes the potential for lasting digital experiences with embedded economic systems and opportunities for community creation.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bamboo Sales (Village Artisan Example)",
|
||||
"description": "The traditional system of acquiring essential household items, such as bamboo for laundry, involved purchasing from specialized artisans within a village. These artisans possessed high levels of skill in their craft and provided a crucial service to the community, fostering a sense of interdependence. The system depended on personal relationships and a reciprocal exchange of goods and services, contrasting with modern retail models. It provided income for skilled artisans and ensured the availability of specific goods for villagers.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/027_BankAmericard Distribution Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/027_BankAmericard Distribution Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "BankAmericard Distribution Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Bank of America employed a mass mailing strategy, sending unsolicited plastic cards to its Fresno customers in 1958, which served as a pivotal moment in credit card history. This 'shotgun' approach, distributing cards without prior solvency checks, demonstrated a willingness to experiment with new marketing tactics and significantly expand credit access. The protocol, while innovative, also involved risks and generated debates around responsible lending practices. It proved to be a highly effective means of rapid adoption and established a template for widespread credit card distribution.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/028_Bartleby Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/028_Bartleby Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bartleby Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Bartleby protocols, inspired by Melville's short story, signify agency achievable through inaction and passive resistance. Individuals operating within these protocols find liberation by refusing to participate in established systems or processes. This form of agency rejects the prevailing norms, offering a unique mode of challenging authority and finding personal freedom. It challenges the assumption of continual engagement and demands a reconsideration of resistance strategies.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/029_Basel Program.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/029_Basel Program.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Basel Program",
|
||||
"description": "The Basel Program, adopted at the First World Zionist Congress, outlined the goals of establishing a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion exploited the existence of this program, falsely claiming it was part of a larger conspiracy to control the world. By associating the Basel Program with their fabricated document, the Protocols aimed to discredit the Zionist movement and portray it as a sinister plot. The distortion of this program demonstrates how real-world political initiatives can be twisted to serve ideological agendas.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/030_Bell Pit Spacing.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/030_Bell Pit Spacing.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bell Pit Spacing",
|
||||
"description": "Early miners established a protocol of maintaining sufficient distance between bell pits to prevent the collapse of one pit from impacting the structural integrity of others. This was a pragmatic solution given the method of excavation and the inherent instability of bell pit structures. The distance helped minimize the risk of catastrophic failures and ensured miners could continue operations in nearby locations. This demonstrates an early understanding of risk mitigation in a hazardous environment.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/031_Benefit Application Procedures.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/031_Benefit Application Procedures.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Benefit Application Procedures",
|
||||
"description": "These formalized steps are required to process applications for social welfare programs, typically covering requirements for documentation, eligibility verification, and assessment of needs. They ensure equitable distribution of resources and promote transparency in the delivery of social services. These procedures aim to streamline access to vital support systems for those who qualify. This creates a consistent standard for providing support.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/032_Bertillonage.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/032_Bertillonage.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bertillonage",
|
||||
"description": "Bertillonage, a system developed by Alphonse Bertillon, mandated standardized photographic methods for identification and criminal record-keeping. This protocol involved taking multiple photographs of individuals, including full-face, profile, and distinctive features, alongside detailed measurements and biographical data. The intention was to create a permanent and unique record for each person, facilitating accurate identification and tracking, with a process intended to minimize errors and standardize data collection and storage. Ultimately, this system established a formalized, bureaucratic approach to criminal identification based on photographic documentation.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bilderatlas Mnemosyne (Warburg\u2019s Method)",
|
||||
"description": "Aby Warburg's *Bilderatlas Mnemosyne* establishes a unique protocol for art historical investigation through the creation of thematic panels comprised of disparate images. These panels utilize a process of *Orientierung*, assembling visuals based on recurring visual tropes and symbolic resemblances rather than chronological or geographical order. The practice aims to reveal hidden connections and unconscious patterns across time and cultures, fostering an unconventional understanding of collective memory. The system prioritized visual connections over traditional art historical analysis.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/034_Birth Registration (City Hall).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/034_Birth Registration (City Hall).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Birth Registration (City Hall)",
|
||||
"description": "The formal act of registering a birth with local government ensures the legal recognition of an individual's existence and establishes crucial records for various administrative purposes. This protocol typically involves completing standardized forms, providing documentation, and receiving official certificates that verify the individual\u2019s identity and birth details. Such records are vital for accessing services like education, healthcare, and citizenship and represent an essential component of modern governance.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/035_Bitcoin Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/035_Bitcoin Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bitcoin Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Bitcoin relies on technical protocols, rather than corporate servers, to enable a new form of power and financial freedom. This system leverages cryptographic math within a blockchain, aiming to supplant the need for traditional national security forces. The idea is that this decentralized approach provides a pathway for power and resources to exit the current reigning system. Ultimately, it aims to provide an alternative means of security and governance beyond the power of nation-states. The Bitcoin protocol is a decentralized system for issuing digital currency, aiming to replace the role of traditional financial institutions like banks and states. It utilizes blockchain technology to maintain a shared, verifiable ledger of transactions, enabling peer-to-peer exchange without central authority. Participants are incentivized to uphold the protocol through rewards in digital tokens, ensuring the integrity of the network and its shared data. This system's voluntary nature and potential for collective governance have sparked various attempts at applying similar structures to other domains. This foundational set of rules defines how the Bitcoin cryptocurrency operates, including transaction validation, block creation, and network consensus. The protocol dictates the mathematical processes and governance mechanisms that ensure the security and integrity of the system. It\u2019s a decentralized system, meaning no single entity controls its operation, promoting resilience and user autonomy. The protocol\u2019s design prioritizes transparency and immutability, creating a tamper-proof ledger of transactions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/036_Black Feminist Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/036_Black Feminist Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Black Feminist Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "These protocols draw on the work of thinkers like Patricia Hill Collins and Donna Haraway, emphasizing the importance of standpoint epistemology and situated knowledge. They prioritize the experiences and perspectives of marginalized communities, particularly Black women, in understanding social and political issues, challenging traditional approaches to knowledge creation and power structures. This often involves foregrounding lived experiences and recognizing how social location shapes understanding, moving beyond universalizing claims and recognizing the diversity within marginalized groups. Further, these protocols focus on fostering collective empowerment and challenging systemic inequalities through intersectional analysis and activism.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/037_Black Poethics.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/037_Black Poethics.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Black Poethics",
|
||||
"description": "Denise Ferreira da Silva's philosophical framework highlights the ethical considerations arising from Black experiences and perspectives. It prioritizes a critical examination of power dynamics and challenges conventional notions of morality. This ethical lens encourages a reevaluation of social structures and their impact on marginalized communities. It\u2019s a way to reimagine social relations and create ethical frameworks informed by Black experiences and knowledge.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/038_Black Time Belt.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/038_Black Time Belt.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Black Time Belt",
|
||||
"description": "The Black Time Belt is a creation of Robert Sember, designed to reclaim and reimagine the understanding of time from a Black perspective. It functions as a reorientation of temporal frameworks to challenge oppressive systems. The project serves as a way to create space and agency for Black individuals to define their own timelines and narratives. This initiative actively resists linear, Eurocentric notions of time.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/039_Blueprint Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/039_Blueprint Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Blueprint Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This is a structured set of practices, including nutrition and fitness routines, designed to automate health-related decisions and reduce cognitive load. It aims to optimize various aspects of well-being through rigorous tracking and adherence to a predefined plan. Individuals following the protocol often report a sense of liberation from daily decision-making, though it requires significant commitment and may not be suitable for everyone. The overarching goal is to improve health outcomes by minimizing variability and promoting consistency.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/040_Borgesian Aleph Construction.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/040_Borgesian Aleph Construction.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Borgesian Aleph Construction",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol describes a deliberate attempt to recreate the universe within a contained system, mirroring the short story of Borges. Eve's plan is to meticulously reconstruct all data points and interactions associated with Zoe, aiming to achieve an exact replica of his existence. The process demands an immense computational infrastructure capable of simulating the entire world, highlighting a desire to achieve a state of complete understanding and potentially, a form of resurrection. The endeavor symbolizes an attempt to encompass all of reality within a single, comprehensible framework.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/041_Bristlemouth Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/041_Bristlemouth Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bristlemouth Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The Bristlemouth protocol is an emerging standard for underwater connectivity, designed to replace proprietary connectors and enable flexible configurations for oceanographic instrumentation. It involves a screw-based mechanism and face-seal O-rings to provide a secure and reliable connection in harsh underwater environments. The goal is to allow users to easily add and modify sensors to their monitoring systems, promoting adaptable solutions for diverse oceanographic research and resource management needs. This is intended to be an open standard, intended for broad adoption by the scientific community.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/042_Buddhist Monastery Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/042_Buddhist Monastery Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Buddhist Monastery Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Historically, Buddhism spread across Asia through the establishment of interconnected monasteries, serving as centers for spiritual practice and cultural exchange. These monasteries formed networks of belonging, providing mutual support and fostering the transmission of knowledge. This early model of interconnected communities demonstrated a pathway for cultural influence without centralized control, sharing spiritual principles and customs across continents. They represent a precedent for geographically dispersed communities sharing a common ethos.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/043_Building Codes.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/043_Building Codes.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Building Codes",
|
||||
"description": "These formalized procedures and regulations govern the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings, prioritizing safety, accessibility, and structural integrity. They dictate everything from material specifications and fire safety measures to zoning regulations and environmental sustainability. Adherence to building codes safeguards lives and promotes responsible development within a community. These create a high baseline of safety.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/044_German Bureaucratic Prose.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/044_German Bureaucratic Prose.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "German Bureaucratic Prose",
|
||||
"description": "The text discusses the formalized writing styles prevalent in early modern German bureaucracy noting a deliberate use of ritualized gestures and distancing language. This style aimed to create a sense of authority and impartiality while performing administrative tasks. It involved careful adherence to pre-determined formats and a reliance on standardized phrases and sentence structures. The goal was to create a record of actions that was both comprehensive and seemingly objective embodying a specific form of institutional communication. Weber describes a modern form of organization where protocols are central to establishing a persona of objectivity and impersonality. These protocols involve formalized written procedures and documentation intended to replace personal rule with a system based on rational-legal administration. The aim is to create a consistent and predictable system",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/045_Calendar Invite and Alarm System.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/045_Calendar Invite and Alarm System.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Calendar Invite and Alarm System",
|
||||
"description": "Modern individuals leverage digital calendars, automated alarms, and notification systems to maintain a structured schedule and track commitments. This system enables a degree of temporal coordination across a vast network and minimizes cognitive load associated with scheduling. It\u2019s a complex web of automated reminders and digital synchronization, fostering predictability in a complex work and social life. The protocols reinforce a culture of punctuality and adherence to schedules, and provide a degree of control over one's use of time.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/046_Canary Use for Gas Detection.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/046_Canary Use for Gas Detection.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Canary Use for Gas Detection",
|
||||
"description": "Early miners employed canaries to detect afterdamp and stinkdamp, providing an early warning system for dangerous gas mixtures. Birds' physiological responses to these gases would be observed before humans would exhibit symptoms. This utilized the differing sensitivities of avian and human systems to alert miners to unseen threats.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/047_Canonical Bridge Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/047_Canonical Bridge Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Canonical Bridge Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "These protocols aim to establish trustless connections between different blockchain networks, allowing for the secure transfer of assets and data. They utilize cryptographic techniques and decentralized mechanisms to verify transactions and prevent fraud. The goal is to enable seamless interoperability between different blockchains and expand the possibilities for decentralized applications. The protocol emphasizes secure data and asset transfer between blockchains, and reducing the central points of failure.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Capital Markets Opening and Closing Times Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Financial markets operate according to a structured schedule, with specific times for opening and closing, regulating the availability of trading. This protocol establishes boundaries for market activity, providing a framework for price discovery and order execution. Trading hours contribute to market stability and allow for orderly settlements, but trading outside these hours typically requires specific permissions and conditions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/049_Carriage Dispute Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/049_Carriage Dispute Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Carriage Dispute Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "A specific example, the 'Carriage Dispute Protocol' of 1661, illustrates a historical instance where formalized etiquette became a source of conflict. It involved a disagreement between Spain and France concerning precedence in a procession, escalating to armed confrontation among followers. This event underscores how adherence to protocol could become a proxy for power struggles and contribute to violent outcomes.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "CART (Communication Access Realtime Translation) Provision Protocol (Community Arts Org)",
|
||||
"description": "\u201cOffering CART (Communication Access Realtime Translation) is a higher level of real-time captioning service that provides more verbatim and immediate transcription during events. This protocol allows individuals who are Deaf or hard of hearing to access information with greater accuracy and immediacy",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/051_Chancery Ceremonies.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/051_Chancery Ceremonies.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Chancery Ceremonies",
|
||||
"description": "The text describes 'chancery ceremonies' related to diplomatic protocol, which formerly involved extensive paperwork and structured processes for issuing documents, accrediting envoys, and formally communicating between states. This system, common in the 20th century, involved meticulous record-keeping and adherence to hierarchical rules, reflecting the importance of maintaining a rigid structure in diplomatic relations. These ceremonies were responsible for issuing documents, maintaining rank, and formal correspondence. It was a standardized method for managing the complexities of international communication.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Child Discipline (Spanking/Grounding)",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol establishes methods for correcting behavior in children, often involving physical punishments or restrictions on freedom. Such disciplinary actions are frequently passed down through generations without critical examination of their effectiveness or potential harm. This approach represents a structured way to maintain order and reinforce expectations within a family unit. While common, this disciplinary protocol may not align with contemporary understanding of child development and positive parenting techniques.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Childbirth Protocols (Local Knowledge)",
|
||||
"description": "These represent community-based practices and beliefs surrounding childbirth, often passed down through generations of women. They differ from standardized medical protocols that might be imposed from outside, emphasizing the importance of cultural context and traditional knowledge. These practices value the lived experiences and wisdom of local midwives and mothers, acknowledging the profound cultural significance of birth. Defending these practices stands in opposition to solely globalized medical intervention.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/054_Choose Your Own Adventure Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/054_Choose Your Own Adventure Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Choose Your Own Adventure Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol dictates a non-linear narrative structure where readers actively shape the story\u2019s progression through a series of decisions. The reader is presented with choices at key narrative points, and their selection dictates the subsequent storyline and eventual conclusion. This allows for multiple possible outcomes and provides a level of interactivity not typically found in traditional linear narratives, creating a personalized storytelling experience.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Chronicles of Suffering (Thirty Years' War)",
|
||||
"description": "The unpublished accounts from individuals experiencing the Thirty Years' War documented the hardships and violence encountered during the conflict, often interweaving personal narratives with reflections on spiritual implications. These narratives chronicled experiences of suffering, loss, and devastation, providing insights into the impact of war on individuals and communities, with personal reflections regarding the spiritual dimensions of this trauma. They serve as a less structured means of exploring the intersections between personal experiences and broader historical and spiritual contexts.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/056_Chronometer Usage Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/056_Chronometer Usage Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Chronometer Usage Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The use of chronometers in naval navigation established a protocol for precise timekeeping and position calculation, essential for long-distance voyages and mapping. It involved correlating ship time with the reference time at Greenwich Observatory, allowing for accurate determination of longitude and enabling explorers to chart courses and establish locations. The protocol\u2019s adoption facilitated expanded trade routes, naval power projection, and the extraction of resources from distant lands. This standardized process served as a technical basis for the advancement of colonialism.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/057_Circular Movement Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/057_Circular Movement Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Circular Movement Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The passage discusses a cultural difference concerning direction when moving in a circle, specifically referencing Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee practices. Anishinaabe traditionally move clockwise, while Haudenosaunee move counterclockwise, and shared gatherings often involve playful recognition of this difference. This illustrates a method of fostering diplomacy and understanding through acknowledging and respecting differing customs, thereby promoting peace and shared values.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/058_City-States.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/058_City-States.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "City-States",
|
||||
"description": "A form of political organization where a city and its surrounding territory function as a unified, independent entity. These structures often exhibit a concentration of political and economic power within the urban center, fostering distinct cultural identities. Historically, they promoted innovation and trade, but also frequently engaged in competition and conflict with neighboring entities. The structure provides an alternative model of governance distinct from larger empires or nation-states.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/059_Clan Identification.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/059_Clan Identification.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Clan Identification",
|
||||
"description": "Sharing one's clan is a vital aspect of Anishinaabe introductions, signifying belonging within a complex kinship system. Clan affiliations dictate roles and responsibilities within the community and demonstrate interconnectedness. It acknowledges the individual's position within a larger social and spiritual network, enriching understanding. This practice ensures accurate placement within the complex network of relationships and responsibilities.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/060_Climate Treaties.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/060_Climate Treaties.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Climate Treaties",
|
||||
"description": "International agreements aimed at addressing climate change, involving commitments from various nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate. Protocols within these treaties often outline specific targets, reporting mechanisms, and financial contributions, designed to ensure accountability and progress towards shared goals. The adherence and effective implementation of these agreements depend on the political will of participating nations and the establishment of robust verification procedures. The development of these treaties mirrors evolving scientific understanding and growing awareness of the global impact of climate change.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/061_Cloud Data Capturing.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/061_Cloud Data Capturing.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Cloud Data Capturing",
|
||||
"description": "This approach to studying clouds involves detailed measurement and analysis of atmospheric conditions. It combines theoretical physics with observational data to understand cloud behavior and climate processes. The protocols involved encompass techniques for assessing temperature, humidity, and other factors. Furthermore, it\u2019s suggested that these protocols could be adapted to achieve a deeper understanding of climate change by shifting from spatial to temperature-based coordination.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/062_Coal Dust Mitigation.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/062_Coal Dust Mitigation.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Coal Dust Mitigation",
|
||||
"description": "As coal production rates increased, a significant concern emerged regarding the saturation of mine air with flammable coal dust and hazardous silica. This posed explosion and respiratory illness risks. Protocols for mitigating this involved ventilation improvements and efforts to suppress dust generation, though these were often insufficient to completely eliminate the problem.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/063_Code of Criminal Procedure Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/063_Code of Criminal Procedure Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Code of Criminal Procedure Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The Code of Criminal Procedure outlines specific guidelines for legal proceedings",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/064_College Enrollment.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/064_College Enrollment.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "College Enrollment",
|
||||
"description": "College enrollment functions as a protocol that dictates a structured path for young people involving academic pursuits and eventual career development. This protocol involves specific enrollment processes",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/065_Column Chromatography.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/065_Column Chromatography.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Column Chromatography",
|
||||
"description": "Column chromatography is a technique used to separate mixtures of compounds based on their differing affinities for a stationary phase and a mobile phase. It's employed to isolate specific molecules from complex mixtures, relying on the interaction of components with a column packed with a material that selectively binds certain substances. This process, often used in scientific research, is crucial for purification and analysis. In the context of the text, it's adapted for DIY hormone extraction, replacing costly commercial supplies with accessible alternatives.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/066_Command and Control.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/066_Command and Control.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Command and Control",
|
||||
"description": "This framework in military strategy, emphasizes leadership and coordinating subordinates through a continuous cycle of commands and feedback. It involves transmitting instructions and then incorporating new information to adapt those instructions, fostering adaptability and effective execution. This model views acts of war as information technology feedback loops and highlights the importance of responsiveness and situational awareness. Effective command and control ensures synchronized actions and optimizes the impact of military operations.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/067_Commemorative Coin Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/067_Commemorative Coin Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Commemorative Coin Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The commemorative coin's design reflects a performance of accessibility to the French monarchy under Louis XIV, portraying the king as approachable and open to subjects of all ranks. This visually communicated a specific protocol of royal interaction, contrasting with the idea of a distant or tyrannical ruler who isolates themselves from the populace. The coin\u2019s imagery was designed to foster an impression of easy access, highlighting a public performance of the king\u2019s supposed openness to petitioners and concerns. The protocol served as a form of propaganda, reinforcing the image of a benevolent and accessible monarch.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/068_Communal Altar Creation.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/068_Communal Altar Creation.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Communal Altar Creation",
|
||||
"description": "Within the context of the vigil, this protocol involves community members contributing compostable items like soil, water, seeds, clay, flowers, herbs, and fruit to form a collective altar. This act symbolizes interconnectedness and shared responsibility for environmental protection. The creation of the altar fosters a sense of unity and provides a focal point for remembrance and healing. Each element contributes to a shared symbol of mourning and commitment to safeguarding the environment.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/069_Communication Protocols (Cold War).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/069_Communication Protocols (Cold War).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Communication Protocols (Cold War)",
|
||||
"description": "The text discusses communication protocols as essential tools in managing crises during the Cold War, examining how information flow and messaging are governed. These protocols dictated how information was transmitted, interpreted, and acted upon between opposing nations, establishing channels for negotiation and de-escalation. Deviations from these protocols, whether intentional or accidental, carried significant risks, potentially leading to misunderstandings and escalations. A focus on communication protocol serves to highlight the vital function of maintaining order in interactions amidst geopolitical competition.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Community Land Acknowledgement Protocol (Gallery)",
|
||||
"description": "\u201cThe gallery's practice of beginning meetings with a land acknowledgement",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/071_Community Lore Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/071_Community Lore Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Community Lore Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "The text alludes to the existence of protocols inherent in community lore and storytelling, suggesting a structured means of transmitting cultural knowledge across generations. These protocols involve more than just retelling stories; they may include specific rules about who tells which stories, when they are told, and how they are adapted or modified over time. This pattern is about social cohesion and the passing down of heritage.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/072_Compost-Based Ritual Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/072_Compost-Based Ritual Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Compost-Based Ritual Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "The creation and utilization of compost during the environmental vigil demonstrate a method of returning resources to the earth. Community members contribute compostable materials like soil, water, seeds, and flowers. This composting process transforms organic waste into fertile soil. The resulting compost is then used to nurture a commemorative tree, symbolizing rebirth and renewal. The method aims to create a cyclical process of giving back to the environment.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Conciliatory Chairman Intervention Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "In moments of heightened tension or unproductive back-and-forth between participants, a neutral chairman will intervene to de-escalate the situation, redirect the conversation, and maintain order. This involves acknowledging the disagreement, briefly summarizing the current impasse, and then suggesting a path forward \u2013 often involving a time constraint or refocus on the immediate task. The intervention serves to facilitate progress and prevent the conversation from spiraling into unproductive conflict. The chairman\u2019s actions demonstrate a commitment to impartiality and a desire to keep the meeting on track.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/074_Content Moderation Standards.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/074_Content Moderation Standards.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Content Moderation Standards",
|
||||
"description": "These guidelines outline how companies jointly manage content on social media platforms, defining what content is acceptable and what is not, and setting expectations for user behavior. These standards are frequently contested and evolve as platforms grapple with issues of free speech, misinformation, and harmful content. The collaborative nature of these standards demonstrates an attempt to establish norms beyond legal or governmental oversight.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/075_Cooking Practices.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/075_Cooking Practices.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Cooking Practices",
|
||||
"description": "This method of learning to cook focuses on direct observation and tactile engagement with ingredients and processes, rather than following written recipes. Children learn by watching and participating in the actions of experienced cooks, gaining a deep understanding of seasonality and local ingredients. These practices emphasize sensory awareness and building a relationship with food, reflecting a holistic approach to cooking that goes beyond simply following instructions. This embodied knowledge is passed down through generations, creating a living tradition of culinary expertise.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/076_Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/076_Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)",
|
||||
"description": "UTC is a time standard based on astronomical observations and used globally for coordinating timekeeping, and is centered on England as a historical artifact. It provides a common reference point for time zones and communication systems, ensuring synchronization in various applications such as aviation, telecommunications, and scientific research. The standard ensures a consistency for setting clocks for trade and scientific institutions across the world.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Coordinatizing Scientific Observation",
|
||||
"description": "The shift from isolated observations to viewing data points \u2013 especially within phenomena like cloud formations \u2013 as a coordinated whole exemplifies a pattern of interaction that prioritizes understanding system-level behavior. This entails recognizing shared traits and incorporating aspects of collective processes into scientific analysis, rather than treating variables as independent entities. It underscores a holistic approach to scientific inquiry, emphasizing interconnectivity and shared characteristics rather than fragmented analysis.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/078_Corporate Contracts.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/078_Corporate Contracts.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Corporate Contracts",
|
||||
"description": "Formal agreements that govern the relationships between businesses and their stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, and customers. These contracts establish clear expectations, responsibilities, and liabilities, providing a framework for predictable and reliable business operations. By adhering to standardized legal principles, these contracts enable complex transactions and support economic growth. They represent a formalized structure essential to modern commerce.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Corridor Design (Government Buildings)",
|
||||
"description": "The architectural protocol of using corridors in government buildings prioritized efficient internal passage and information flow. Corridors align doors and offices in relation to each other, creating standardized routes and streamlining movement. This design element aimed to increase efficiency and potentially create more egalitarian social interactions, diminishing the importance of physical distance between rooms and offices.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/080_Council of Ministers Meetings.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/080_Council of Ministers Meetings.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Council of Ministers Meetings",
|
||||
"description": "Deliberations among the Council of Ministers played a critical role in preparing proposals for the emperor\u2019s consideration, outlining regulatory projects, and forging a unified stance on matters of state. These gatherings served as a space for discussion and negotiation, with the resulting proposal being presented to the emperor for ultimate approval or modification, showcasing the structured nature of imperial decision-making. The emphasis was on aligning ministerial positions to streamline the approval process.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Cover Letter (Early Credit Agreements)",
|
||||
"description": "Merchants previously extended credit using handwritten notes known as 'cover letters,' where customers pledged to pay a specified amount by a set date. These letters functioned as informal IOU's, fostering trust between merchant and customer. They laid the groundwork for more standardized credit practices, as a formalized agreement. This practice highlights an earlier iteration of credit management, before the advent of formalized credit systems and banking institutions. The acceptance of these cover letters created a nascent credit system based on trust and reputation within the community. This system gradually evolved into more formal credit agreements, ultimately laying the groundwork for modern credit card practices.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/082_COVID-19 Mask Mandate Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/082_COVID-19 Mask Mandate Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "COVID-19 Mask Mandate Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic established a social protocol for protecting public health. These protocols dictated the consistent wearing of masks in public settings to mitigate the spread of the virus. Mask protocols raised questions regarding personal freedom and the collective responsibility to protect vulnerable populations. These protocols shifted social norms and altered routines across many segments of society.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/083_COVID-19 Pandemic Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/083_COVID-19 Pandemic Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "COVID-19 Pandemic Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread adoption of protocols designed to mitigate the spread of the virus, resulting in a new normal characterized by significant change. These protocols included mask mandates, social distancing guidelines, and restrictions on gatherings, impacting social, economic, and political systems globally. The effectiveness and longevity of these measures became points of contention, revealing underlying tensions related to individual liberties and collective responsibility. This resulted in a complicated interplay between public safety, freedom of choice, and the impact of these protocols on the societal fabric.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/084_COVID-19 Regulations.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/084_COVID-19 Regulations.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "COVID-19 Regulations",
|
||||
"description": "During the pandemic, specific protocols emerged to limit the spread of the virus and protect public health. These included measures such as social distancing, mandatory mask-wearing, and frequent handwashing, designed to minimize transmission through close contact. Initially disruptive, these regulations became ingrained in daily routines and underscored the adaptability of social norms in the face of crisis. The effectiveness and perceived intrusiveness of these protocols sparked debates about individual liberties and collective responsibility.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/085_Cowrie Bead Currency.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/085_Cowrie Bead Currency.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Cowrie Bead Currency",
|
||||
"description": "Throughout various cultures, cowrie shells have served as a form of currency, representing value beyond their intrinsic worth. This system of exchange facilitated trade and supported economic activity in regions distant from their origin. The recurring use of the shells established a predictable pattern of interaction, creating a stable and widely accepted medium of exchange. Furthermore, their dual role as both currency and symbolic objects highlights the complex interplay between economic and cultural values.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/086_Crash Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/086_Crash Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Crash Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Following accidents, a 'crash protocol' emerges as a framework for response, investigation, and recovery efforts. This protocol defines roles, establishes communication channels, and outlines procedures for assessing damage, providing assistance, and restoring normalcy. It provides a structured approach to managing unexpected events, ensuring coordinated action and minimizing disruption. This protocol facilitates resilience and allows the rapid restoration of order after a crisis.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/087_"Open Publishing.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/087_"Open Publishing.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "\"Open Publishing",
|
||||
"description": "\"Open publishing describes the practice of making research outputs freely available online, often through pre-print servers or open-access journals. The text views open publishing as a double-edged sword, generating widespread information but also contributing to the challenge of managing a deluge of data and claims. It has ironically resulted in what the text calls a bench of untapped talent, as freely available research inspires new ideas but lacks a structured means for assessment. The speed of information transmission needs to be leveraged for science and collaboration.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/088_Criminological Discourse Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/088_Criminological Discourse Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Criminological Discourse Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Criminological discourse protocols shaped how criminal events were described and recorded, aiming for an objective and detached representation of reality. They involved prioritizing a formal and impersonal style, mimicking a natural and civil order to ensure uniformity and consistency. The protocols prioritized portraying the recorder as an impartial observer, striving for objectivity. Ultimately, the aim was to ensure reliable data for legal processes and societal understanding of crime.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Crisis Communication Protocols (Cold War)",
|
||||
"description": "The text details crisis communication protocols utilized during the Cold War, emphasizing their role in managing tensions and preventing escalation. These protocols involved structured channels for transmitting information, procedures for verifying data, and guidelines for crafting diplomatic responses. By adhering to these protocols, nations sought to convey stability and reassure each other during periods of high alert, even when underlying disagreements persisted. Their effectiveness depended on maintaining trust and transparency between parties.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/090_CRISPR.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/090_CRISPR.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "CRISPR",
|
||||
"description": "CRISPR represents a rapidly developing protocol in the realm of genetic engineering, facilitating precise modification of DNA sequences. It involves a defined sequence of steps, utilizing specific enzymes and guide RNAs to target and alter genetic material. The precision and accessibility of this protocol have democratized genetic research, fostering innovation and enabling applications across diverse fields. This technology exemplifies how a formalized set of tools and procedures can enable complex, previously inaccessible manipulations.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/091_CubeSat Protocol.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/091_CubeSat Protocol.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "CubeSat Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "The CubeSat protocol establishes standardized dimensions and interfaces for small satellites, enabling interoperability and fostering innovation in space exploration. It dictates the physical structure, power requirements, and communication methods for these satellites, promoting modularity and reducing development costs. This standardization has been critical in democratizing access to space, allowing smaller organizations and educational institutions to participate in space-based research and development. The evolution of CubeSat technology highlights the power of shared specifications in driving technological advancements and enabling wider participation in a complex field.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/092_Currency Ledgers.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/092_Currency Ledgers.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Currency Ledgers",
|
||||
"description": "These represent the formalized systems that track and validate the movement of digital or physical currency, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of transactions. They often involve cryptographic techniques, distributed consensus mechanisms, and regulatory frameworks, which are essential for maintaining trust and security within the financial ecosystem. These ledgers are fundamental for economic activity, providing a shared record of financial interactions and enabling seamless payments across borders.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/093_Dating Websites (Pre-App).json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/093_Dating Websites (Pre-App).json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Dating Websites (Pre-App)",
|
||||
"description": "Prior to the rise of apps, dating websites like early OkCupid emphasized more detailed profiles and compatibility surveys. Users could create lengthy biographies, signal niche interests, and prioritize matching based on shared values and personality traits rather than solely physical attractiveness. This fostered a system where users searched based on deeper compatibility criteria and engaged in potentially longer interactions. The approach resulted in a more deliberate process designed for finding meaningful connections rather than rapid-fire matching.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "De umbrias ideareum (Bruno\u2019s Memory Seals)",
|
||||
"description": "Giordano Bruno\u2019s *De umbrias ideareum*, or *On the Shadows of Ideas*, outlines a methodology for accessing and organizing profound insights through abstract diagrams and symbolic representations. Bruno employed a system of memory seals, intricate visual patterns designed to trigger associations and expand understanding. The protocol demands a deliberate process of contemplation and internalization of the symbolic language. This involved turning memory wheels and internalizing the relationships they conveyed.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governance Voting Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "DAOs often use token-based voting to make collective decisions and allocate resources, enabling community participation in governance. This protocol establishes a system where token holders can propose and vote on proposals, such as funding initiatives or amending rules. The implementation relies on smart contracts and blockchain technology to ensure transparency and immutability, however, DAO governance protocols are vulnerable to hostile takeovers and treasury raids.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Decision-Making Process in Case of Disagreement",
|
||||
"description": "When ministerial conferences failed to reach a consensus, the emperor would often intervene to resolve the conflict, typically favoring the vote of the interior minister. This protocol demonstrated the emperor's role as a mediator and arbiter in situations where disagreements among ministers could not be resolved through standard negotiation procedures. The emperor often sought to bring a conflict to resolution.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/097_Decision-Making via Vote.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/097_Decision-Making via Vote.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Decision-Making via Vote",
|
||||
"description": "Proposed actions are evaluated through a formal vote among designated individuals. The vote tally determines the outcome, signifying a consensus-based decision-making process. This procedural mechanism ensures fairness and transparency in decision-making.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/098_Decision-Making within the Cabinet.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/098_Decision-Making within the Cabinet.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Decision-Making within the Cabinet",
|
||||
"description": "The process by which decisions were reached and implemented within the Imperial and Royal Cabinet Chancellery followed a structured pattern involving multiple layers of review and approvals. Issues were discussed and debated, with outcomes meticulously documented in minutes. This formalized approach aimed to ensure consistency and accountability in governmental actions, showing a systematic method in official dealings.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
285
synthetic_readings/099_Deep Fake Generation Protocols.json
Normal file
285
synthetic_readings/099_Deep Fake Generation Protocols.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Deep Fake Generation Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "An emerging pattern of interaction around the manipulation of digital media using techniques like machine learning and cryptography. These protocols allow for the creation of fabricated images or videos that can be difficult to distinguish from reality. This shows a dangerous new application of existing technologies and implies an emerging need for new verification methods and patterns of interaction.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user