Added synthetic readings
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Schneider
@@ -2,6 +2,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
This repository is a collection point for data from the [Protocol Bicorder](https://git.medlab.host/ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder) app.
|
||||
|
||||
Be attentive to JSON version numbers, as they are subject to change. The data here include various version numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contents
|
||||
|
||||
* The `readings/` directory includes readings uploaded by users of the Bicorder web app.
|
||||
* The `synthetic_readings/` directory includes readings generated by LLM synthesis as described [here](https://git.medlab.host/ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder/src/branch/main/analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
Data licensed in the public domain.
|
||||
|
||||
[](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
|
||||
[](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Abdication Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Though not formally codified, the King\u2019s abdication represents a deviation from the accepted protocol for royal succession. It marks a departure from the traditional expectation that monarchs serve until death and a disruption of the established system of power transfer. This departure challenged the established norm for royal behavior and demonstrated the possibility of opting out of a predetermined role, albeit with significant consequences. The event served as a striking example of challenging predefined patterns of action.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Abolitionist Practice Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This is referenced as a method of enacting change that focuses on dismantling systems of oppression and building alternative forms of social organization. It emphasizes creating practices rooted in self-determination and shared struggle. It's a protocol about creating alternatives and taking action in the present, working towards a future free from oppressive structures, and building resilience through reciprocal support.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access Check-in",
|
||||
"description": "This is a protocol increasingly adopted in collaborative spaces to proactively identify and address participant needs beyond standard accommodations like ASL and captioning. It involves a dedicated portion of a meeting where participants are invited to share their needs and preferences, including fatigue levels or preferences for staying off-camera. This signals a commitment to inclusivity and prioritizes a participant-centered approach to engagement, and aims to foster a more comfortable and accessible environment.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access Intimacy Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This describes a spontaneous and often unarticulated feeling of connection and understanding between individuals related to access needs. It is characterized by an elusive comfort that arises when someone \"gets\" your specific access requirements, often transcending political or shared identity. The protocol is less about a structured process and more about recognizing and appreciating moments of intuitive, reciprocal understanding in the shared experience of disability. Experiencing this protocol can cultivate feelings of safety and validation.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Access-Centered Practices",
|
||||
"description": "In response to ableism within institutional settings during the COVID-19 pandemic, this protocol emphasizes inclusivity and accessibility for individuals with disabilities. It involves modifying communication methods, physical spaces, and programmatic elements to ensure participation for all. Beyond legal requirements, this process represents a move towards dismantling discriminatory practices and centering the experiences of disabled individuals. Ultimately, it highlights the importance of collective responsibility for creating equitable spaces.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ActivityPub Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "ActivityPub is an open-source protocol designed for decentralized social networking, allowing users to interact across different platforms and maintain greater control over their data and online presence. It enables users to subscribe to content from any server, blocking unwanted users or entire servers, fostering a more customizable and community-driven social experience. The system\u2019s design aimed to address concerns about censorship and platform monopolies, offering users alternatives to centralized social media services. While adoption has faced challenges, it represents a shift towards more user-centric and interoperable online interactions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "African Futurist Escape",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol leverages narratives like those of High John and Brerer Rabbit to offer a cartographic pathway towards freedom, utilizing escape as a coping mechanism and reinforcing the belief in the possibility of alternative existences. It involves envisioning and temporarily inhabiting realms beyond the constraints of the present reality, offering solace and hope in times of hardship. The protocol's efficacy lies in its ability to momentarily detach from oppressive conditions and inspire a sense of agency and possibility, ultimately contributing to a reimagining of future prospects.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Afrofuturism",
|
||||
"description": "The protocol of Afrofuturism provides an imaginative pathway to liberation by envisioning futures free from oppression and historical trauma. It employs narratives and artistic expressions that draw upon African and diasporic experiences to explore themes of technology, identity, and possibility. By creating alternate realities and alternative narratives, Afrofuturism offers solace, hope, and the inspiration to challenge constraints, and to navigate challenging times, demonstrating that other ways of being are possible. This process allows individuals to escape the limitations of the present and to envision a brighter, more equitable future.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Airport Security Procedures",
|
||||
"description": "These procedures represent a structured set of actions and guidelines aimed at enhancing safety and preventing threats within airport environments. The procedures encompass passenger screening, baggage inspections, and security personnel protocols. The actions are designed to mitigate risks and ensure compliance with aviation regulations. These actions influence the travel experience and shape security practices globally.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Alusi Trance (African Futurism)",
|
||||
"description": "Inspired by Nnedi Okorafor's work, this protocol represents a spiritual departure from the physical body, facilitating communication with ancestral spirits and accessing knowledge of the wilderness \u2013 a timeless realm beyond the constraints of the present. It's a temporary transcendence where individuals can connect with wisdom, healing, and guidance from previous generations. The process is deeply rooted in African spiritual traditions and offers a pathway to profound self-discovery and reconnection with cultural heritage.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Ancestral Spirit Possession",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol signifies a spiritual interaction where the past enters the present through a form of spiritual intervention. It involves a temporary inhabitation or connection with the spirit of an ancestor, often manifesting as a trance state or ecstatic expression. The experience can offer guidance, healing, or knowledge of the future, providing a link to ancestral wisdom. Such encounters blur the boundaries between time and realms, offering a dynamic exchange between generations.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Anishinaabeg Knowledge Sharing Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Traditional methods for sharing knowledge are rooted in the reciprocity and the mutual benefit of community relationships. Elders and knowledge-keepers pass down information, teachings, and skills to younger generations using storytelling, observation, and hands-on experiences. These shared methods aim to build strong community bonds, respect ancestral knowledge, and ensure the transmission of cultural heritage. They promote intergenerational connection and foster a sense of continuity.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Anishinaabeg Visiting Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "Traditional Anishinaabeg protocols outline respectful ways to visit and engage with community members, emphasizing reciprocity and mutual benefit. These protocols guide interactions, emphasizing a deep respect for the host\u2019s space and perspective, which prioritizes building strong, lasting relationships. The protocols underscore a shared responsibility to uphold the community\u2019s values and ensure that interactions are positive and enriching for all involved. They demonstrate a model of interaction that centers care, listening, and honoring ancestral knowledge.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Annual Feasts",
|
||||
"description": "Recurring celebrations marking significant events or seasons, annual feasts provide a framework for community gatherings and shared experiences. These scheduled events reinforce cultural values and offer opportunities for communal storytelling and artistic expression. The predictable nature of the feast fosters a sense of continuity and strengthens bonds between individuals and generations. Essentially, they structure shared time and reinforce collective identity.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Arendt's Reporting Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Hannah Arendt's approach to reporting on the Eichmann trial involved meticulous reliance on available materials and a critical assessment of their reliability. She analyzed trial records, police interrogations, and press accounts, recognizing potential inaccuracies in the German translations. Arendt\u2019s reporting also emphasized the limited and specific audience present at the trial, and her critique of the trial's framework and its handling of public spectacle. Her overall method aimed to provide an objective account of the proceedings while also critiquing its political and performative aspects.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ARPANET Protocols",
|
||||
"description": "These are the initial protocols utilized by the ARPANET, representing a foundational set of rules for early network communication. They were instrumental in demonstrating the feasibility of packet switching and networked data transfer, laying the groundwork for the internet's architecture. While superseded by more advanced protocols, the ARPANET protocols remain significant for their historical role in shaping modern networking concepts. They embody the pioneering efforts to establish reliable data transmission over a distributed network.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Arranged Marriage",
|
||||
"description": "While not explicitly detailed, arranged marriage is implied as an alternative to modern dating protocols. In this traditional practice, families take the lead in selecting partners for their children, often based on social, economic, and familial compatibility. The protocol bypasses individual choice and romantic attraction, prioritizing long-term stability and community cohesion. It represents a stark contrast to the autonomous and often superficial nature of modern dating.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Art Historical/Curatorial Validation Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Museum staff and scholars engage in a validation protocol, a reciprocal system through which art historians seek acknowledgement from curators and curators seek it from historians. A curator\u2019s validation comes through public recognition for a successful exhibition, while a historian's comes from the credibility gained from published works. This often fosters competition and a subtle power dynamic between these critical figures in the art world.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Artisanal Marketing Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This tactic is utilized when organizations attempt to add value to products or processes that are becoming anachronistic. Rather than streamlining or phasing out older methods, these are rebranded as \u2018artisanal\u2019 to evoke a sense of craftsmanship, quality, and exclusivity. The method allows for the preservation of legacy practices while capitalizing on consumer preferences for authenticity and unique experiences. It effectively masks a decline in productivity or relevance by attributing value to the historical context of production.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Artistic Collaboration",
|
||||
"description": "The Invisible Borders road trips exemplified a collaborative artistic model where photographers and writers worked together, fostering an environment of mutual learning and shared creative responsibility. This group dynamic encouraged open dialogue, diverse perspectives, and a collective exploration of artistic themes. The process underscored the importance of recognizing the perspectives of others and how collaboration can enrich the creative process.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "ASL Provision Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "This protocol outlines steps for providing sign language interpretation, aiming to ensure accessibility for Deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. It recommends providing interpreters who share cultural or racial identities with the audience or artists, supplying scripts or written materials for pre-event preparation, and encouraging slower speech and pauses during events. The protocol also advises reserving visible seating and requesting introductions by name to facilitate communication effectively. Beyond these technicalities, the protocol encourages building relationships within the Deaf community to enhance its impact.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Audience Recording Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Records of audiences with the emperor were integral to the Cabinet Office's procedures and were meticulously documented within the minute books. These records detailed the circumstances of the imperial review, including the nature of the presented material and any observations or reactions from the emperor. The meticulous logging of audience details served to create a traceable history of the decision-making process and demonstrated accountability within the system. This formalized the imperial involvement and ensured a consistent record of the reviewed materials.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Authority Assertions via Linguistic Precision",
|
||||
"description": "Speakers emphasize meticulous vocabulary and phraseology to assert intellectual authority and signal their mastery of the subject matter. This involves using precise terminology and avoiding ambiguity, even when simpler language might suffice. The deliberate use of complex language functions as a subtle form of signaling, indicating expertise and demanding respect from other participants. It also serves to create a sense of exclusivity and reinforce the speaker's position as a knowledgeable leader.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Automobile Driver Warning Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Drivers often utilize standardized signals, such as turn signals, horn use, or hand gestures, to communicate intentions to other drivers and pedestrians. These signals serve as vital indicators of planned movements or potential hazards, helping to prevent accidents and maintain traffic flow. They are typically unstated but rely on a shared understanding of road safety norms and signaling conventions among drivers. These protocols can sometimes fail due to limited visibility, distraction, or misinterpretation, leading to collisions.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Autonomous Worlds (0xPARC framework)",
|
||||
"description": "0xPARC's concept of Autonomous Worlds envisions blockchain-based game environments with inherent properties of persistence and player-driven development. These worlds are characterized by spatial reasoning, territorialism, and a shared understanding of rulesets. Unlike traditional games, Autonomous Worlds strive for a degree of self-governance and continuous evolution based on player interactions. The framework emphasizes the potential for lasting digital experiences with embedded economic systems and opportunities for community creation.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 4,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "Bamboo Sales (Village Artisan Example)",
|
||||
"description": "The traditional system of acquiring essential household items, such as bamboo for laundry, involved purchasing from specialized artisans within a village. These artisans possessed high levels of skill in their craft and provided a crucial service to the community, fostering a sense of interdependence. The system depended on personal relationships and a reciprocal exchange of goods and services, contrasting with modern retail models. It provided income for skilled artisans and ensured the availability of specific goods for villagers.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 5,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "flocking",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry",
|
||||
"term_right": "swarming",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Coordination occurs through distributed interactions without central direction",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "defensible",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Strong boundaries and protections against external influence",
|
||||
"term_right": "exposed",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "monopolistic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Excludes the use of other protocols with similar purposes",
|
||||
"term_right": "pluralistic",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Interoperates with other protocols and does not exclude their use",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Experience",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is perceived in the context of its implementation",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sufficient",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Adequately meets the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "limited",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Does not, on its own, adequately meet the needs and goals of participants",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "crystallized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon",
|
||||
"term_right": "contested",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Content or meaning are disputed or under debate",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "trust-evading",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Minimizes the need for trust among participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "trust-inducing",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Relies on or cultivates trust among participants",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "predictable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Produces expected and consistent outcomes",
|
||||
"term_right": "emergent",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Produces unexpected or novel outcomes",
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "exclusion",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Creates barriers or excludes certain participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "inclusion",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "restraining",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness",
|
||||
"term_right": "liberating",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "dead",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Not actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "alive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Actively utilized by relevant participants",
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "hardness",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness",
|
||||
"term_right": "softness",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol tends toward properties characterized by softness",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above and determine a mean. Round it to the nearest integer. That is the 'value' here.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 6,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "polarized",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings",
|
||||
"term_right": "centrist",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients",
|
||||
"instructions": "Take all the 'value' fields in the gradients above. Assess their degree of polarization. For instance, if all the values are either 1 or 9, the output would be 1, and if all of them are 5, the output would be 9.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": 3,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
|
||||
"term_right": "relational",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
|
||||
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
|
||||
"automated": true,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "not useful",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The bicorder was not useful or relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"term_right": "very useful",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The bicorder was very useful and relevant for analyzing this protocol",
|
||||
"instructions": "Evaluate the usefulness of this bicorder as a tool for analyzing this protocol, considering whether the gradient terms seemed revealing or irrelevant.",
|
||||
"automated": false,
|
||||
"value": null,
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
|
||||
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
|
||||
"version": "1.2.4",
|
||||
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
|
||||
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
|
||||
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"protocol": "BankAmericard Distribution Protocol",
|
||||
"description": "Bank of America employed a mass mailing strategy, sending unsolicited plastic cards to its Fresno customers in 1958, which served as a pivotal moment in credit card history. This 'shotgun' approach, distributing cards without prior solvency checks, demonstrated a willingness to experiment with new marketing tactics and significantly expand credit access. The protocol, while innovative, also involved risks and generated debates around responsible lending practices. It proved to be a highly effective means of rapid adoption and established a template for widespread credit card distribution.",
|
||||
"analyst": "GPT-OSS",
|
||||
"standpoint": "A careful ethnographer and outsider aspiring to achieve a neutral stance and a high degree of precision",
|
||||
"timestamp": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnostic": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Design",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol is created and remembered",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "explicit",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants",
|
||||
"term_right": "implicit",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use",
|
||||
"value": 7,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "precise",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The design is specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation",
|
||||
"term_right": "interpretive",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The design is ambiguous, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "institutional",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions",
|
||||
"term_right": "vernacular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Design occurs through evolving community interactions",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "documenting",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "The primary purpose is to document or validate activity that is occurring",
|
||||
"term_right": "enabling",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "The primary purpose is to enable activity that might not happen otherwise",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "static",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be as fixed and unchanging as possible",
|
||||
"term_right": "malleable",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to be changed by participants according to evolving needs",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "technical",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among technologies",
|
||||
"term_right": "social",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "universal",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Meant for global adoption across different communities",
|
||||
"term_right": "particular",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Tailored for a specific community",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "durable",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Designed to be persistently available",
|
||||
"term_right": "ephemeral",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Designed to vanish when no longer needed",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"set_name": "Entanglement",
|
||||
"set_description": "How the protocol relates with participant agents",
|
||||
"gradients": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "macro",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Operates at large scales involving many participants or broad scope",
|
||||
"term_right": "micro",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Operates at small scales with few participants or narrow scope",
|
||||
"value": 1,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "sovereign",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "A distinctive operating logic, not subject to any other entity",
|
||||
"term_right": "subsidiary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "An operating logic under the control of a particular entity",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "self-enforcing",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Rules are automatically enforced through its own mechanisms",
|
||||
"term_right": "enforced",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Rules require external enforcement by authorities or institutions",
|
||||
"value": 8,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "abstract",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually",
|
||||
"term_right": "embodied",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participants learn the protocol by physically practicing it",
|
||||
"value": 2,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"term_left": "obligatory",
|
||||
"term_left_description": "Participation is compulsory for a certain class of agents",
|
||||
"term_right": "voluntary",
|
||||
"term_right_description": "Participation in the protocol is optional and not coerced",
|
||||
"value": 9,
|
||||
"notes": null,
|
||||
"shortform": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||