96 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
5.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: post
|
|
author: Cassandra Dana
|
|
title: "The Quiet Media Revolution in Longmont"
|
|
summary: 'Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
|
|
access television.'
|
|
tags: [stakeholder-news, shared-ownership-in-colorado]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
When the *Longmont Observer* responded to a request-for-proposals for control over the
|
|
city's public access channels, the team wasn't sure they'd win. The contract
|
|
had been held by another organization for over 30 years, and most
|
|
assumed it was unlikely to change hands. But the *Observer* presented an
|
|
unusual idea, one that sparked imaginations by proposing to reconfigure
|
|
notions of media ownership.
|
|
|
|
If you walk into one of Longmont Public Media's community organizing meetings, you'll find 20 to 30
|
|
enthusiastic individuals happy to greet you and excited to work. Longmont Public Media is the *Observer*'s new public
|
|
access branch. The energy of this eclectic group is palpable.
|
|
Many in Longmont are excited to be pioneering their own model for public
|
|
access television.
|
|
|
|
The notion of public access television was devised in the late 1960s and
|
|
early 1970s. In the era of the first televised war, NBC, CBS and ABC
|
|
controlled broadcast coverage of the cultural, political and social
|
|
conflict. They depicted the gruesome fighting overseas and the civil
|
|
unrest here in the United States. The effects were extraordinary. Screen
|
|
media began to have a major influence on public policy and mass
|
|
upheaval. TV began to be seen as a uniquely powerful force, one that was
|
|
dictated by commercial broadcast networks. Recognizing the power of the
|
|
medium, counterculture movements and media scholars began to advocate
|
|
for what was referred to as "[Guerrilla Television](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_television)." Michael Shamberg
|
|
pioneered the term in 1971, stating, "Guerrilla Television is grassroots
|
|
television. It works with the people, not from above them."
|
|
|
|
Recognizing the importance of community driven media, the FCC developed
|
|
regulations authorizing state and local governments to require cable
|
|
television networks to set aside channels for public access. Cable
|
|
companies entered franchise agreements with municipalities in which
|
|
access to infrastructure——telephone poles, sidewalks, etc.——was granted
|
|
in exchange for 5 percent of companies' gross revenue. This franchise
|
|
fee was paid to the city, which often reinvested this money into public
|
|
access. Initially many local municipalities adopted this model, granting
|
|
community members access to production and distribution methods.
|
|
However, as pressure for public access decreased and many municipalities
|
|
began experiencing increased financial burdens, funding for public
|
|
access became less feasible. Some communities shut down public access
|
|
channels entirely, while others limited them to local legislative
|
|
proceedings. Public access shifted from a place where community members
|
|
could develop skills and exhibit ideas to a droning of traffic court and
|
|
city council hearings.
|
|
|
|
To complicate the matter further, in August 2019 the FCC approved an
|
|
amendment to their 1970s regulation. The change in legislation allows
|
|
cable companies to deduct "in-kind provisions" from their franchise
|
|
fees. This means cable companies can now assert that the market value of
|
|
public access networks is deductible from
|
|
the revenue they pay to the municipalities. In 2017 Longmont allocated
|
|
25 percent of the franchise fees collected from Comcast (or \$187,924)
|
|
to public access television. [According to the _Colorado Sun_](https://coloradosun.com/2019/02/11/cable-franchise-fee-limit-public-access-channels/), that is
|
|
enough funding to cover one full-time employee and two part-time
|
|
employees. The diminishment of franchise fees will seriously impact
|
|
the ability of cities and states to maintain public access television.
|
|
The president of Rocky Mountain PBS told the _Colorado Sun_, "Going from
|
|
having franchise fees to not having them, typically what happens in that
|
|
case is the public access goes away." It's clear that new models must be
|
|
developed in order to maintain public access.
|
|
|
|
Longmont Public Media has taken on the challenge of innovating public
|
|
access. Its founders have suggested that public access television can truly
|
|
function as it was intended, as a resource created for and by the
|
|
masses. They have proposed a cooperative model of media ownership in
|
|
which members pay a small fee and in exchange can produce and exhibit
|
|
their work. The studio that houses Longmont Public Access will be
|
|
transformed into a media makerspace, serving as a venue for community
|
|
members to create, collaborate, share infrastructure and distribute
|
|
work. Each member of the co-op contributes to ideas around governance,
|
|
programming, events and space utilization. As Michael Shamberg explained
|
|
when he was proposing public access, "The inherent potential of
|
|
information technology can restore democracy in America if people become
|
|
skilled with information tools."
|
|
|
|
This is not Longmont's first foray into municipal ownership of community
|
|
media. In 2014 Longmont launched NextLight, a municipally owned
|
|
broadband enterprise. NextLight has dethroned Google Fiber as the
|
|
fastest fiber-optic network, and it is now a national model for publicly
|
|
owned internet access. Five years later, Longmont is building on this
|
|
precedent through the creation of Longmont Public Media.
|
|
|
|
When Longmont Public Media asked MEDLab to get involved——to help
|
|
formulate this model of cooperative public access——I knew it was an
|
|
opportunity not to be missed. Thursday nights have become one of my
|
|
favorite parts of the week, when I slide past the local middle school
|
|
choir and the couples quietly nestled sipping lattes to the back room of
|
|
the local coffee shop, where we work to revolutionize media ownership.
|