109 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
109 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: post
|
|
author: Nathan Schneider
|
|
title: "Startups Need a New Option: Exit to Community"
|
|
summary: "Why are we building disposable companies?"
|
|
tags: [internet-of-ownership]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<img src="{{ site.baseurl }}{% link /assets/e2c-pricingtable.png %}" style="width: 100%;" />
|
|
|
|
Founders create startups for all sorts of reasons. Often, the motivation
|
|
is a mix between the founders' desires to do well for themselves and to
|
|
do something worthwhile for others. Dreams of greatness might figure in
|
|
there too. Rarely, however, is the overriding reason to build a company
|
|
people want to get rid of. But that is what the startup pipeline is
|
|
designed to produce.
|
|
|
|
When a startup company takes early investment, typically the expectation
|
|
is that everyone is working toward one of two "exit" events: selling the
|
|
company to a bigger company or selling to retail investors in an initial
|
|
public offering. In either case, the startup is a hot potato. One group
|
|
of investors buys in order to sell to another group of investors who buy
|
|
in to sell to the fools down the road. There's something sort of
|
|
pyramid-scheme-ish about all this. The exit event, also, is often the
|
|
beginning of the end of any positive social vision that the company
|
|
might have held.
|
|
|
|
What if startups had the option to mature in a way that gets them out of
|
|
the investors' hamster wheel?
|
|
|
|
In the coming months, I will be exploring strategies and stories that
|
|
could help create a new option for startups: Exit to community. In E2C,
|
|
the company would transition from investor ownership to ownership by the
|
|
people who rely on it most. Those people might be users, workers,
|
|
customers, participant organizations, or a combination of such
|
|
stakeholder groups. The mechanism for co-ownership might be a
|
|
cooperative, a trust, or even crypto-tokens. The community might own the
|
|
whole company when the process is over, or just a substantial-enough
|
|
part of it to make a difference.
|
|
|
|
When a startup exits to community, founders should see enough of a
|
|
reward that they feel their risk and hard work was worth it. Investors
|
|
should see a fair return for their risk. Most importantly, the key
|
|
stakeholders should know the company is worthy of their trust and
|
|
ongoing investment because they co-own it. For a social-media company,
|
|
this might mean that users have a meaningful say in how their private
|
|
data is or isn't used. For a gig platform, it might mean that the gig
|
|
workers co-determine their working conditions and what is done with the
|
|
profits they produce. These kinds of outcomes could help prevent the
|
|
massive accountability crises that now beset today's most successful
|
|
venture-backed startups.
|
|
|
|
One way to begin exploring E2C could be by identifying a subset of
|
|
startups in venture capital portfolios that lie in "zombie"
|
|
territory---somewhere between failure and exit-ready. Investor owners
|
|
would benefit from having a new way of liquidating investments that
|
|
would otherwise lie dormant. In some cases, the community might be in a
|
|
position to buy the company with cash on hand---especially if it came
|
|
back to them in later savings or profits. In other cases, E2C might be
|
|
financed externally on the expectation of future growth, as is generally
|
|
done for employee-ownership conversions using an Employee Stock
|
|
Ownership Plan. Startups might also plan ahead for E2C by identifying
|
|
particular guardrails that keep this option open as they negotiate their
|
|
early rounds of financing. As with the ESOP---and with [the venture
|
|
capital industry
|
|
itself](https://logicmag.io/scale/the-unicorn-hunters/)---a targeted
|
|
policy intervention may be necessary to make this kind of financing
|
|
attractive enough to be feasible. These possibilities and more are the
|
|
kinds of things I've been thinking about and would like to think about
|
|
with others.
|
|
|
|
Why not, you might ask, just begin these startups under community
|
|
ownership? This is certainly an option, and it's one that I have
|
|
enthusiastically supported through the \#PlatformCoop community and
|
|
through co-founding the Start.coop accelerator. But getting going under
|
|
community ownership doesn't seem like the right approach in many cases.
|
|
|
|
Ambitious startups are a risky endeavor, and it may not be fair to
|
|
distribute that risk with early-stage participants. Also, startups
|
|
usually need to make a few dramatic pivots early in their life, and
|
|
having a large community of co-owners would make those hard decisions
|
|
more difficult than if a small, high-trust group of founders is in
|
|
charge. Centralizing the risk and responsibility early on is a
|
|
reasonable strategy for startups. Later, once the company has found its
|
|
market and its footing, the transition to accountable community
|
|
ownership will better suit the nature of the business. With E2C, we get
|
|
the best of both worlds---the dynamic startup, then the accountable,
|
|
sustainable public asset.
|
|
|
|
For me, this vision came together in conversations with social
|
|
enterprise lawyer [Jason Wiener](http://jrwiener.com/team/jason/) (who
|
|
has participated in some exits to community), along with sources of
|
|
inspiration that include [Zebras Unite](https://www.zebrasunite.com/),
|
|
[Louis
|
|
Kelso](https://osf.io/v7fe2/?view_only=2ffd750b4ba54001beb5a459d61faff0),
|
|
[platform cooperativism](https://platform.coop/), and the
|
|
[steward-ownership](http://steward-ownership.com/) network. Now it is
|
|
time to bring more people into the conversation.
|
|
|
|
Our team at the [Media Enterprise Design
|
|
Lab](http://cmci.colorado.edu/medlab/) at the University of Colorado
|
|
Boulder is looking for collaborators on this work. This includes
|
|
entrepreneurs, activists, investors, policy advocates, researchers, and
|
|
more. Do you want to join us? [Let
|
|
](mailto:medlab@colorado.edu?subject=E2C)[us](mailto:medlab@colorado.edu?subject=E2C)[
|
|
know](mailto:medlab@colorado.edu?subject=E2C) what you'd want your E2C
|
|
to look like.
|
|
|
|
*Also published at [Hacker Noon](https://hackernoon.com/startups-need-a-new-option-exit-to-community-ig12v2z73) and [The Internet of Ownership](https://ioo.coop/2019/09/startups-need-a-new-option-exit-to-community/).* |