Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
41 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
41 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
id: restorative-conference
|
|
title: Restorative Conference
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A structured meeting bringing together those harmed, those who caused harm,
|
|
and affected community members to address what happened and what is needed
|
|
to repair it. Rooted in restorative justice traditions from Maori and
|
|
Indigenous practices and widely adapted in criminal justice and schools.
|
|
source: International Institute for Restorative Practices
|
|
source_url: https://www.iirp.edu/
|
|
tags: [restorative, justice, repair, conflict]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Prepare participants
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A facilitator meets separately with those harmed, those who caused
|
|
harm, and supporters of each, to explain the process and confirm
|
|
willingness to participate.
|
|
- headline: Tell what happened
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The person who caused harm describes what they did and what they were
|
|
thinking at the time. Those harmed describe the impact on them.
|
|
- headline: Identify the harm
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Together the group names who was affected and how — including family,
|
|
friends, and the wider community.
|
|
- headline: Build an agreement
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Participants propose what is needed to repair the harm — apologies,
|
|
restitution, behaviour change, support — and agree on specifics.
|
|
- headline: Follow up
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A follow-up meeting checks whether the agreement has been kept and
|
|
whether further repair is needed.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
Those harmed are heard; those who caused harm take responsibility; an
|
|
agreed repair plan is created and reviewed.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Preparation is most of the work. Never convene a conference without
|
|
individual meetings first. The facilitator holds the process, not the
|
|
outcome. |