Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
42 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
42 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
id: permaculture-design-charrette
|
|
title: Permaculture Design Charrette
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A collaborative design process where a group produces a site design in an
|
|
intensive, time-bounded session, drawing on permaculture ethics of
|
|
earth care, people care, and fair share. Originating in the permaculture
|
|
movement founded by Bill Mollison and David Holmgren in Australia.
|
|
source: Permaculture movement / Bill Mollison and David Holmgren
|
|
source_url: https://www.permaculture.org.uk/
|
|
tags: [permaculture, design, collaboration, environmental]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Survey the site and people
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The group walks the site together, observing contours, water, sun,
|
|
existing vegetation, and use patterns. They also survey the needs
|
|
and capacities of the people who will use it.
|
|
- headline: Identify functions and elements
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The group lists the functions the design must serve — food, water,
|
|
shelter, habitat — and the elements that could meet them.
|
|
- headline: Place elements for beneficial relationships
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Working on a shared map, the group places each element where it
|
|
creates beneficial relationships with others — chickens near the
|
|
garden, water tanks above the irrigation point.
|
|
- headline: Present and critique
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Subgroups present their proposed placements; the whole group critiques
|
|
for missed relationships and unmet needs, iterating the design.
|
|
- headline: Record the design
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The final design is recorded on a shared map with a written rationale
|
|
for each placement, and next steps are assigned.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A site design is produced that integrates human and ecological needs
|
|
through the placement of elements in beneficial relationship.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
The site walk is not optional — design without observation produces
|
|
inappropriate designs. Let the land and its patterns lead, not the
|
|
designer's preferences. |