Protocolbot
d19a75ace4
All 100 seed YAML files now have: - Filenames that match their id field - IDs that are slugs of their titles - No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs 70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml, moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml, japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml
41 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
41 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
id: sociocratic-circle-meeting
|
|
title: Sociocratic Circle Meeting
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A sociocratic circle meeting where a working group governs its own domain
|
|
by consent, with a chosen leader and roles, within the larger
|
|
organisation's circles. Developed in the Netherlands by Gerard Endenburg
|
|
as Sociocratic Circle-Organisation Method (SCM).
|
|
source: Sociocracy for All / Endenburg Electrical Engineering
|
|
source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
|
|
tags: [sociocracy, circle, consent, cooperative, governance]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Open with round
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The circle opens with a brief round in which each member shares how
|
|
they are arriving, setting connection before business.
|
|
- headline: Consent to agenda
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The facilitator proposes an agenda. The circle consents to it —
|
|
anyone may add an item by raising a reasoned objection.
|
|
- headline: Work each item by consent
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each agenda item is worked by consent: presentation, clarifying
|
|
questions, consent round. Decisions are adopted when no reasoned
|
|
objection remains.
|
|
- headline: Review roles and measurements
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The circle periodically reviews its roles (leader, facilitator,
|
|
secretary) and its measurements, consenting to any changes.
|
|
- headline: Close with round
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The circle closes with a brief round — one word or sentence from
|
|
each — and the next meeting is confirmed.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
The circle governs its domain by consent, with all roles and decisions
|
|
held by the members rather than imposed from above.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Consent is not consensus — it asks "is this good enough for now, and
|
|
safe enough to try?" not "do we all agree?" This difference lets the
|
|
circle move. |