Files
protocol-droid/seeds/tibetan-buddhist-debate.yaml
T
Protocolbot 5c4c6f4874 fix: remove cultural identifiers from protocol titles for consistency
Cultural context remains in descriptions. Titles now uniformly use the
practice name without prefixing the culture, country, religion, or people.
e.g. 'Quaker Meeting for Worship' -> 'Meeting for Worship',
'Moroccan Jmaa Village Assembly' -> 'Jmaa Village Assembly',
'Aboriginal Yarning Circle' -> 'Yarning Circle'.

43 titles updated across the seed library.
2026-07-08 13:22:21 -06:00

42 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML

id: tibetan-buddhist-debate
title: Buddhist Debate
description: >-
A formal debate practice from Tibetan Buddhist monastic education in which
a challenger poses questions and a defender answers, using prescribed
gestures and logical forms. Originating in the Indian Buddhist pramana
tradition and developed in Tibetan Gelug monasteries such as Sera and
Drepung.
source: Tibetan Buddhist monastic tradition / Geshe Kelsang Gyatso
source_url: https://www.studybuddhism.com/
tags: [tibetan-buddhist, debate, education, logic, monastic]
forked_from: null
image: null
steps:
- headline: Set the roles
description: >-
One person takes the role of challenger (asking) and the other the
defender (answering). The challenger stands; the defender sits.
- headline: Pose the thesis
description: >-
The challenger poses a thesis or question drawn from the text under
study, framing it in the prescribed logical form.
- headline: Defender answers
description: >-
The defender gives a one-word or short answer that commits to a
position, which the challenger will now test.
- headline: Challenger tests with consequences
description: >-
The challenger follows with a sequence of logical consequences
(thal-ching), using claps and gestures to mark each step, seeking to
draw the defender into contradiction.
- headline: Concede or restate
description: >-
The defender concedes if cornered, or restates the position more
precisely. The debate ends when the thesis is either confirmed or
shown incoherent.
outcome: >-
The defender's understanding of the thesis is tested and sharpened
through public logical pressure; the audience follows the reasoning.
practice: >-
The gestures and claps are not theatre — they mark logical steps and
keep the debate's pace. Honour the form; it enables rigour.