Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
32 lines
1.4 KiB
YAML
32 lines
1.4 KiB
YAML
id: nonviolent-communication-observation
|
|
title: NVC Observation Step
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The first step of Marshall Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication — stating
|
|
an observation free of evaluation, blame, or interpretation. Rooted in
|
|
Rosenberg's work in mediation and peace education.
|
|
source: Center for Nonviolent Communication
|
|
source_url: https://www.cnvc.org/
|
|
tags: [nvc, communication, conflict, listening]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Identify the stimulus
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Before speaking, the person identifies the specific thing they observed
|
|
— what they saw or heard, separate from any judgement about it.
|
|
- headline: State without evaluation
|
|
description: >-
|
|
They articulate the observation as a factual statement: "When I saw the
|
|
dishes left on the table after dinner..." rather than "When you were
|
|
inconsiderate..."
|
|
- headline: Invite confirmation
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The speaker can invite the other person's view of the same observation,
|
|
allowing shared ground before moving to feelings and needs.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
The conversation begins from a shared, non-judgemental description rather
|
|
than from accusation, reducing defensiveness.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Practice distinguishing observation from evaluation — "you were late" is
|
|
often an evaluation. "We agreed to meet at seven; you arrived at seven
|
|
twenty" is an observation. |