Cultural context remains in descriptions. Titles now uniformly use the practice name without prefixing the culture, country, religion, or people. e.g. 'Quaker Meeting for Worship' -> 'Meeting for Worship', 'Moroccan Jmaa Village Assembly' -> 'Jmaa Village Assembly', 'Aboriginal Yarning Circle' -> 'Yarning Circle'. 43 titles updated across the seed library.
43 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
43 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
id: jewish-hevruta
|
|
title: Hevruta Paired Study
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A Jewish practice of paired text study in which two partners read a text
|
|
together and argue with and for each other to reach deeper
|
|
understanding. Originating in the Talmudic tradition of havruta study
|
|
in yeshivas.
|
|
source: Jewish textual tradition / Heschel and Hartman Institute
|
|
source_url: https://hartman.org.il/
|
|
tags: [jewish, hevruta, study, dialogue, education]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Choose a partner and text
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Two study partners (hevruta) choose a text — often a page of Talmud,
|
|
a passage of Torah, or a philosophical text — and read it aloud
|
|
together.
|
|
- headline: Read closely, aloud
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The partners read the text line by line, aloud, pausing at each
|
|
difficulty. Reading aloud surfaces what silent reading misses.
|
|
- headline: Argue with and for
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each partner argues their reading of a passage, then argues the
|
|
other's reading charitably — taking the opposing view seriously
|
|
enough to make it well.
|
|
- headline: Rest on difficulty
|
|
description: >-
|
|
When a passage resists resolution, the partners leave the question
|
|
open rather than forcing closure. The text's difficulty is part of
|
|
the study.
|
|
- headline: Summarise what shifted
|
|
description: >-
|
|
At the close, each partner names one thing they now understand
|
|
differently than when they began.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
Each partner reaches a deeper understanding than either could alone,
|
|
through the discipline of arguing with and for each other.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Hevruta is not debate to win. The discipline of arguing the other's view
|
|
well is what distinguishes it. Choose a partner who will disagree, not
|
|
one who will agree. |