Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
42 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
42 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
id: delphi-method
|
|
title: Delphi Method
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A structured method for gathering expert judgement through rounds of
|
|
anonymous questionnaires with controlled feedback, used when direct
|
|
meeting is impractical or would be distorted by dominance. Developed at
|
|
the RAND Corporation in the 1950s.
|
|
source: RAND Corporation
|
|
source_url: https://www.rand.org/
|
|
tags: [delphi, expert, decision-making, foresight]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Define the question
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The coordinators define the question and recruit a panel of experts
|
|
who will participate across several rounds.
|
|
- headline: First round questionnaire
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each panellist responds independently and anonymously to the first
|
|
questionnaire, providing their judgement and reasoning.
|
|
- headline: Summarise and feed back
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The coordinators summarise all responses — including areas of
|
|
agreement and disagreement — and feed them back to the panel
|
|
without identifying who said what.
|
|
- headline: Revise in light of others
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each panellist revises their judgement in light of the summary,
|
|
optionally explaining why they hold their view against the group.
|
|
- headline: Iterate to convergence
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Rounds continue (typically three or four) until judgement stabilises.
|
|
The final summary reports the distribution of views, not a forced
|
|
consensus.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A reasoned, anonymised convergence of expert judgement that resists the
|
|
dominance and groupthink of face-to-face meetings.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Anonymity is the engine — without it, the most senior or loudest voice
|
|
distorts the rest. Do not force consensus; report the spread of
|
|
judgement honestly. |