Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
45 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
45 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
id: jain-amicable-debate
|
|
title: Jain Anekantavada Multi-View Dialogue
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A Jain practice of dialogue grounded in anekantavada — the doctrine that
|
|
truth has many aspects — in which disputants present and hold each
|
|
other's views as partially true, rather than as wholly wrong. Rooted in
|
|
Jain philosophy dating to ancient India, formalised in the
|
|
syadvada method of seven-fold predication.
|
|
source: Jain philosophical tradition / Mahavira
|
|
source_url: https://www.jainworld.com/
|
|
tags: [jain, anekantavada, dialogue, india, philosophy]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Present one's view
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each disputant presents their view fully, without interruption. The
|
|
other listens as if it may be true, not as if it is wrong.
|
|
- headline: Acknowledge partial truth
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each party acknowledges the partial truth in the other's view —
|
|
"from one perspective, what you say is so." No view is held as the
|
|
whole truth.
|
|
- headline: Use syadvada predication
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Each proposition is considered from seven standpoints: in one way it
|
|
is; in one way it is not; in one way it is and is not; in one way it
|
|
is inexpressible; and combinations thereof. This surfaces the
|
|
limits of each view.
|
|
- headline: Hold the multi-view
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Rather than collapse to one view, the dialogue holds the multiple
|
|
perspectives as each partially true. The resolution is not
|
|
synthesis but coexistence.
|
|
- headline: Act with humility
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Any action taken proceeds with the acknowledgment that the view it
|
|
rests on is partial, not absolute. Dogmatism is the failure mode.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A dialogue concludes with each view held as partially true, and action
|
|
taken with the humility that no single view captures the whole.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
The discipline is to genuinely hold the other's view as possibly true,
|
|
not to perform it. If you cannot find the partial truth in the other's
|
|
view, you have not yet understood it. |