feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols

Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures
and practices:

Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer,
Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina,
Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence,
Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa,
Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio,
Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban,
Filipino utari, Ainu practices

Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee,
Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta,
Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning

Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats,
Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen
Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective,
Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning

Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance,
Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance,
Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo

Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing,
Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror,
Appreciative apology repair

Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle,
Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette

Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar

Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols

All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in
descriptions. All YAML files validated.

seeds/tibetan-buddhist-debate.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+id: tibetan-buddhist-debate
+title: Tibetan Buddhist Debate
+description: >-
+  A formal debate practice from Tibetan Buddhist monastic education in which
+  a challenger poses questions and a defender answers, using prescribed
+  gestures and logical forms. Originating in the Indian Buddhist pramana
+  tradition and developed in Tibetan Gelug monasteries such as Sera and
+  Drepung.
+source: Tibetan Buddhist monastic tradition / Geshe Kelsang Gyatso
+source_url: https://www.studybuddhism.com/
+tags: [tibetan-buddhist, debate, education, logic, monastic]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Set the roles
+    description: >-
+      One person takes the role of challenger (asking) and the other the
+      defender (answering). The challenger stands; the defender sits.
+  - headline: Pose the thesis
+    description: >-
+      The challenger poses a thesis or question drawn from the text under
+      study, framing it in the prescribed logical form.
+  - headline: Defender answers
+    description: >-
+      The defender gives a one-word or short answer that commits to a
+      position, which the challenger will now test.
+  - headline: Challenger tests with consequences
+    description: >-
+      The challenger follows with a sequence of logical consequences
+      (thal-ching), using claps and gestures to mark each step, seeking to
+      draw the defender into contradiction.
+  - headline: Concede or restate
+    description: >-
+      The defender concedes if cornered, or restates the position more
+      precisely. The debate ends when the thesis is either confirmed or
+      shown incoherent.
+outcome: >-
+  The defender's understanding of the thesis is tested and sharpened
+  through public logical pressure; the audience follows the reasoning.
+practice: >-
+  The gestures and claps are not theatre — they mark logical steps and
+  keep the debate's pace. Honour the form; it enables rigour.