Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
42 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
42 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
id: tibetan-buddhist-debate
|
|
title: Tibetan Buddhist Debate
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A formal debate practice from Tibetan Buddhist monastic education in which
|
|
a challenger poses questions and a defender answers, using prescribed
|
|
gestures and logical forms. Originating in the Indian Buddhist pramana
|
|
tradition and developed in Tibetan Gelug monasteries such as Sera and
|
|
Drepung.
|
|
source: Tibetan Buddhist monastic tradition / Geshe Kelsang Gyatso
|
|
source_url: https://www.studybuddhism.com/
|
|
tags: [tibetan-buddhist, debate, education, logic, monastic]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Set the roles
|
|
description: >-
|
|
One person takes the role of challenger (asking) and the other the
|
|
defender (answering). The challenger stands; the defender sits.
|
|
- headline: Pose the thesis
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The challenger poses a thesis or question drawn from the text under
|
|
study, framing it in the prescribed logical form.
|
|
- headline: Defender answers
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The defender gives a one-word or short answer that commits to a
|
|
position, which the challenger will now test.
|
|
- headline: Challenger tests with consequences
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The challenger follows with a sequence of logical consequences
|
|
(thal-ching), using claps and gestures to mark each step, seeking to
|
|
draw the defender into contradiction.
|
|
- headline: Concede or restate
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The defender concedes if cornered, or restates the position more
|
|
precisely. The debate ends when the thesis is either confirmed or
|
|
shown incoherent.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
The defender's understanding of the thesis is tested and sharpened
|
|
through public logical pressure; the audience follows the reasoning.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
The gestures and claps are not theatre — they mark logical steps and
|
|
keep the debate's pace. Honour the form; it enables rigour. |