feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols

Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures
and practices:

Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer,
Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina,
Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence,
Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa,
Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio,
Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban,
Filipino utari, Ainu practices

Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee,
Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta,
Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning

Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats,
Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen
Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective,
Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning

Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance,
Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance,
Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo

Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing,
Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror,
Appreciative apology repair

Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle,
Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette

Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar

Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols

All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in
descriptions. All YAML files validated.

seeds/sociocratic-election.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+id: sociocratic-election
+title: Sociocratic Election by Consent
+description: >-
+  A sociocratic method for selecting people to roles through consent rather
+  than majority vote. Developed in the Netherlands by Gerard Endenburg from
+  earlier Quaker-influenced sociocratic work.
+source: Sociocracy for All
+source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
+tags: [sociocracy, election, consent, governance]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Define the role
+    description: >-
+      The group defines the function, term, and tasks of the role to be
+      filled, written so all share the same understanding.
+  - headline: Nominate by discussion
+    description: >-
+      Members discuss who might fill the role, nominating others and
+      themselves, and explaining their reasoning for each suggestion.
+  - headline: Candidate consents
+    description: >-
+      The person proposed is asked whether they can serve; they may accept,
+      decline, or ask for changes to the role's scope or support.
+  - headline: Test for consent
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator asks whether anyone has a reasoned objection to the
+      candidate serving in the role. Objections are addressed until none
+      remain.
+  - headline: Confirm
+    description: >-
+      The election is confirmed by consent; the role definition and any
+      agreed changes are recorded.
+outcome: >-
+  A person is selected to a role with the consent of the group and the
+  candidate, and the role itself has been clarified.
+practice: >-
+  Nominations are not votes — discussion of why someone is suited is the
+  point. Allow the candidate to negotiate the role; elections that ignore
+  the candidate's consent produce poor results.