feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
id: nonviolent-communication-request
|
||||
title: NVC Request Step
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The fourth step of Marshall Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication — making
|
||||
a clear, actionable request rather than a demand. Used after observation,
|
||||
feelings, and needs have been shared.
|
||||
source: Center for Nonviolent Communication
|
||||
source_url: https://www.cnvc.org/
|
||||
tags: [nvc, communication, request, conflict]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Form a concrete request
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The speaker makes a specific, doable request: "Would you be willing
|
||||
to check in with me before changing our shared deadline?" rather than
|
||||
"I want you to be more considerate."
|
||||
- headline: Phrase as a question
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The request is phrased as a question the other can answer with no,
|
||||
without punishment. A request is not a demand.
|
||||
- headline: Receive the answer
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The speaker receives the answer — yes, no, or counter — without
|
||||
withdrawing empathy or imposing consequence. A "no" is information
|
||||
about the other's needs, not a rejection.
|
||||
- headline: Continue the dialogue
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
If the answer is no, the speaker returns to the other's feelings and
|
||||
needs, exploring what need the "no" is meeting.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
A clear request is made that the other can freely accept or refuse,
|
||||
keeping the dialogue in connection rather than coercion.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
If a "no" leads to punishment or guilt, the request was a demand. Test
|
||||
yourself: would you still respect a "no"? If not, you are not yet making
|
||||
a request.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user