ntnsndr/protocol-bicorder
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Changed major LDA category names

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Schneider
2026-02-21 17:25:22 -07:00
parent 62a6b0ba2c
commit 61dac6ff28
2 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
bicorder.json
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
{
"name": "Protocol Bicorder",
"schema": "bicorder.schema.json",
"version": "1.2.5",
"version": "1.2.6",
"description": "A diagnostic tool for the study of protocols",
"author": "Nathan Schneider",
"date_modified": "2025-12-02",
"date_modified": "2026-02-21",
"metadata": {
"protocol": null,
@@ -265,11 +265,11 @@
"notes": null
},
{
"term_left": "bureaucratic",
"term_left_description": "The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement",
"term_right": "relational",
"term_right_description": "The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation",
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly bureaucratic/institutional protocols and 9 represents strongly relational/cultural protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
"term_left": "formal",
"term_left_description": "Exhibits bureaucratic characteristics with centralized control and predictable enforcement",
"term_right": "informal",
"term_right_description": "Exhibits relational characteristics with distributed coordination embedded in culture",
"instructions": "Based on the diagnostic readings, calculate the protocol's position using Linear Discriminant Analysis. The LDA score is scaled to the 1-9 range, where 1 represents strongly formal protocols and 9 represents strongly informal protocols. A score of 5 indicates a protocol near the boundary exhibiting characteristics of both families.",
"automated": true,
"value": null,
"notes": null

6
bicorder.txt
View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
ANALYSIS
hardness < [---------] > softness
polarized < [---------] > centrist
bureaucratic < [---------] > relational
formal < [---------] > informal
not useful < [---------] > very useful
GLOSSARY
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
| -------------- | ----------- |
| abstract | Participants learn the protocol by studying it intellectually |
| alive | Actively utilized by relevant participants |
| bureaucratic | The protocol exhibits institutional, formal, top-down characteristics with centralized control and external enforcement |
| centrist | The analyst tended toward readings at the middle of the gradients |
| contested | Content or meaning are disputed or under debate |
| crystallized | Content or meaning are settled and widely agreed upon |
@@ -65,9 +64,11 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
| explicit | Design is stated explicitly somewhere that is accessible to participants |
| exposed | Weak boundaries and vulnerable to external influence |
| flocking | Coordination occurs through centralized direction or direct mimicry |
| formal | Exhibits bureaucratic characteristics with centralized control and predictable enforcement |
| hardness | The protocol tends toward properties characterized by hardness |
| implicit | Design is not stated explicitly and is learned by use |
| inclusion | Reduces barriers and includes diverse participants |
| informal | Exhibits relational characteristics with distributed coordination embedded in culture |
| institutional | Design occurs through processes controlled by powerful institutions |
| interpretive | Ambiguous design, allowing participants a wide range of interpretation |
| liberating | Enables participants to carry out desired activities with less work or thought |
@@ -83,7 +84,6 @@ self-enforcing < [---------] > enforced
| polarized | The analyst tended toward more extreme high or low readings |
| precise | Specified with a high level of precision that eliminates ambiguity in implementation |
| predictable | Produces expected and consistent outcomes |
| relational | The protocol exhibits community-based, emergent, bottom-up characteristics with distributed coordination and voluntary participation |
| restraining | Fosters experiences of absurd complexity, alienation, and powerlessness |
| self-enforcing | Rules automatically enforced through its own mechanisms |
| social | Primarily concerned with interactions among people or groups |