ntnsndr/collective-governance-ai
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added material on most-impacted communities

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Schneider
2025-11-23 14:22:39 +00:00
parent 991e64a4dd
commit 6b9eb89653
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
src/data/zine.md
View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
# Collective Governance for AI: Points of Intervention
Made for ![the world](metagov.png) by [Metagov](https://metagov.org)
@@ -105,6 +104,7 @@ How does public policy shape the design, development, and deployment of AI syste
What cultural norms form around expectations for AI providers and users? How do these norms shape behavior?
* Promote clear statements of shared values like the [DWeb Principles](https://getdweb.net/principles/)
* Ensure that discussions on AI norms and policy [center frontline and most-impacted communities](https://frontandcentered.org/now-that-frontline-communities-have-the-governments-attention-how-will-they-be-defined/), rather than just technologists and business elites
* Establish clear, context-sensitive agreements on AI use at sites such as classrooms, workplaces, and communities
* Cultivate awareness of the risks around addictive design, surveillance, and user profiling from personal use of corporate AI platforms that are not collectively governed
* Encourage practices of collaboration, creative thinking, and disconnection that resist dependency on corporate AI
@@ -132,8 +132,9 @@ How do different community-governed AI systems connect, share information, and m
Finally, what feedback loops can we imagine across these layers of the stack? How could change in one area lead to greater change through its effects at other layers?
* Collective power at the level of deployment can put pressure on changing norms in training and tuning processes
* Collective power at the level of deployment can put pressure on changing norms in training and tuning processes
* Successful training of smaller, more efficient models can enable AI systems that are less costly and easier for communities to own and govern
* Centering impacted communities in design and deployment can reframe narratives about what AI should be for and what it is capable of
* Economies more conducive to investment for collective ownership can open the door to collective governance at multiple levels
* Interconnected ecosystems of open standards and shared norms can spread best practices developed in one policy context to others
@@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ Feedback loops can be messy. Remember that collective governance begins with car
## Credits
Initiated and edited by Nathan Schneider, with contributions from Cormac Callanan, B Cavello, Coraline Ada Ehmke, Val Elefante, Cent Hosten, Joseph Low, Thomas Renkert, Julija Rukanskaitė, Ann Stapleton, Joshua Tan, Madisen Taylor, Freyja van den Boom, Jojo Vargas, Mohsin Y. K. Yousufi, Ian Williams, and Michael Zargham.
Initiated and edited by Nathan Schneider, with contributions from Cormac Callanan, B Cavello, Coraline Ada Ehmke, Val Elefante, Cent Hosten, Joseph Low, Thomas Renkert, Julija Rukanskaitė, Ann Stapleton, Joshua Tan, Madisen Taylor, Freyja van den Boom, Jojo Vargas, Mohsin Y. K. Yousufi, Ian G. Williams, and Michael Zargham.
Website built with open-source software and AI collaboration. Text by collaborating humans.