Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
40 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
40 lines
1.8 KiB
YAML
id: consensus-with-facilitator
|
|
title: Consensus Decision with Facilitator
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A facilitated consensus process in which a group works toward agreement
|
|
that everyone can support or at least not block. Common in cooperative and
|
|
activist organising, drawing on Quaker and collective practice.
|
|
source: Seeds for Change, "Consensus Decision Making"
|
|
source_url: https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus
|
|
tags: [consensus, decision-making, facilitation]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Present the proposal
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A proposer summarises the proposal and the need it addresses, then
|
|
yields to questions of clarification only — not opinions.
|
|
- headline: Gather concerns
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The facilitator invites concerns and reservations, listed visibly
|
|
without debate. Each concern is a chance to improve the proposal.
|
|
- headline: Amend and discuss
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The group discusses amendments that address concerns, with the
|
|
facilitator tracking proposals and checking for agreement on each
|
|
change.
|
|
- headline: Test for consensus
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The facilitator asks whether anyone cannot live with the revised
|
|
proposal. A block must come with a reasoned explanation and an offer to
|
|
help find a solution.
|
|
- headline: Confirm and record
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The decision is restated, written down with any reservations noted, and
|
|
the action steps and responsible parties are confirmed.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A decision that all participants can support, with dissent engaged rather
|
|
than overridden.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
Distinguish a block from a stand-aside. A block is rare and serious — when
|
|
blocks recur, revisit the proposal's assumptions or the group's shared aims. |