Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
41 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
41 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
id: climate-assembly-sortition
|
|
title: Citizens' Climate Assembly
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A deliberative democracy method where a representative sample of a
|
|
population, chosen by sortition (random selection), is convened to learn
|
|
about and recommend policy on a complex issue. Used increasingly for
|
|
climate policy, following models from Ireland, France, and the UK.
|
|
source: newDemocracy Foundation / OECD Innovative Citizen Participation
|
|
source_url: https://www.oecd.org/governance/innovative-citizen-participation/
|
|
tags: [sortition, citizens-assembly, climate, deliberative-democracy]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Select by sortition
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A representative sample of the population — typically 60 to 150 people
|
|
— is selected by random stratified sortition to reflect the
|
|
demographics of the whole.
|
|
- headline: Learn from evidence
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly hears from experts, stakeholders, and community members
|
|
across the spectrum of views, with time to question and deliberate.
|
|
- headline: Deliberate in small groups
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Members deliberate in facilitated small groups, working through the
|
|
trade-offs and values at stake, with facilitators ensuring all speak.
|
|
- headline: Draft recommendations
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly drafts recommendations, voting on each. Recommendations
|
|
reflect the considered view of the body, including dissent.
|
|
- headline: Report to the polity
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly's recommendations are presented to the sponsoring
|
|
government or public, with a commitment to respond.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A representative body of ordinary citizens produces considered
|
|
recommendations on a complex issue, informed by evidence and deliberation.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
The sortition is the legitimacy — it is not a self-selected panel.
|
|
Quality of facilitation determines whether all voices actually shape the
|
|
outcome. Government must commit to respond, or the assembly erodes trust. |