Protocolbot
3522c2ec5c
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
44 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
44 lines
2.0 KiB
YAML
id: climate-assembly-oxford
|
|
title: Oxford Citizens' Climate Assembly
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A specific citizens' assembly model piloted by the newDemocracy
|
|
Foundation and Oxford City Council, in which a stratified random sample
|
|
of residents deliberates on climate policy and reports recommendations
|
|
to council. Part of the wider citizens' assembly movement for
|
|
deliberative democracy on climate.
|
|
source: newDemocracy Foundation / Oxford City Council
|
|
source_url: https://www.newdemocracy.com.au/
|
|
tags: [citizens-assembly, climate, sortition, local-government]
|
|
forked_from: null
|
|
image: null
|
|
steps:
|
|
- headline: Recruit by sortition
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A stratified random sample of around 40 Oxford residents is recruited
|
|
to reflect the city's demographics on age, gender, ethnicity, and
|
|
deprivation.
|
|
- headline: Learn over multiple weekends
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly meets over two or more weekends, hearing from climate
|
|
experts, stakeholders, and each other, with time to question and
|
|
deliberate.
|
|
- headline: Deliberate in facilitated small groups
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Members deliberate in small facilitated groups, working through
|
|
trade-offs and drafting recommendations, with all voices
|
|
supported.
|
|
- headline: Vote on recommendations
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly votes on each recommendation. Recommendations that pass
|
|
are reported with the level of support and dissent noted.
|
|
- headline: Report and council response
|
|
description: >-
|
|
The assembly reports to the council, which commits to respond to
|
|
each recommendation — accept, reject, or adapt — within a set time.
|
|
outcome: >-
|
|
A representative body of residents produces considered climate
|
|
recommendations, and the council is bound to respond publicly to each.
|
|
practice: >-
|
|
The council's commitment to respond is what gives the assembly weight.
|
|
Without it, the assembly becomes consultation theatre. Sortition, not
|
|
self-selection, is the legitimacy. |