fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles

All 100 seed YAML files now have:
- Filenames that match their id field
- IDs that are slugs of their titles
- No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs

70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml,
moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml,
japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml

seeds/sociocratic-circle-meeting.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+id: sociocratic-circle-meeting
+title: Sociocratic Circle Meeting
+description: >-
+  A sociocratic circle meeting where a working group governs its own domain
+  by consent, with a chosen leader and roles, within the larger
+  organisation's circles. Developed in the Netherlands by Gerard Endenburg
+  as Sociocratic Circle-Organisation Method (SCM).
+source: Sociocracy for All / Endenburg Electrical Engineering
+source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
+tags: [sociocracy, circle, consent, cooperative, governance]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Open with round
+    description: >-
+      The circle opens with a brief round in which each member shares how
+      they are arriving, setting connection before business.
+  - headline: Consent to agenda
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator proposes an agenda. The circle consents to it —
+      anyone may add an item by raising a reasoned objection.
+  - headline: Work each item by consent
+    description: >-
+      Each agenda item is worked by consent: presentation, clarifying
+      questions, consent round. Decisions are adopted when no reasoned
+      objection remains.
+  - headline: Review roles and measurements
+    description: >-
+      The circle periodically reviews its roles (leader, facilitator,
+      secretary) and its measurements, consenting to any changes.
+  - headline: Close with round
+    description: >-
+      The circle closes with a brief round — one word or sentence from
+      each — and the next meeting is confirmed.
+outcome: >-
+  The circle governs its domain by consent, with all roles and decisions
+  held by the members rather than imposed from above.
+practice: >-
+  Consent is not consensus — it asks "is this good enough for now, and
+  safe enough to try?" not "do we all agree?" This difference lets the
+  circle move.