fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles

All 100 seed YAML files now have:
- Filenames that match their id field
- IDs that are slugs of their titles
- No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs

70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml,
moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml,
japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml

seeds/oxford-citizens-climate-assembly.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+id: oxford-citizens-climate-assembly
+title: Oxford Citizens' Climate Assembly
+description: >-
+  A specific citizens' assembly model piloted by the newDemocracy
+  Foundation and Oxford City Council, in which a stratified random sample
+  of residents deliberates on climate policy and reports recommendations
+  to council. Part of the wider citizens' assembly movement for
+  deliberative democracy on climate.
+source: newDemocracy Foundation / Oxford City Council
+source_url: https://www.newdemocracy.com.au/
+tags: [citizens-assembly, climate, sortition, local-government]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Recruit by sortition
+    description: >-
+      A stratified random sample of around 40 Oxford residents is recruited
+      to reflect the city's demographics on age, gender, ethnicity, and
+      deprivation.
+  - headline: Learn over multiple weekends
+    description: >-
+      The assembly meets over two or more weekends, hearing from climate
+      experts, stakeholders, and each other, with time to question and
+      deliberate.
+  - headline: Deliberate in facilitated small groups
+    description: >-
+      Members deliberate in small facilitated groups, working through
+      trade-offs and drafting recommendations, with all voices
+      supported.
+  - headline: Vote on recommendations
+    description: >-
+      The assembly votes on each recommendation. Recommendations that pass
+      are reported with the level of support and dissent noted.
+  - headline: Report and council response
+    description: >-
+      The assembly reports to the council, which commits to respond to
+      each recommendation — accept, reject, or adapt — within a set time.
+outcome: >-
+  A representative body of residents produces considered climate
+  recommendations, and the council is bound to respond publicly to each.
+practice: >-
+  The council's commitment to respond is what gives the assembly weight.
+  Without it, the assembly becomes consultation theatre. Sortition, not
+  self-selection, is the legitimacy.