fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles

All 100 seed YAML files now have:
- Filenames that match their id field
- IDs that are slugs of their titles
- No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs

70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml,
moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml,
japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml

seeds/mastodon-federation-governance-vote.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+id: mastodon-federation-governance-vote
+title: Mastodon Federation Governance Vote
+description: >-
+  A governance practice in the Mastodon fediverse community where instance
+  members vote on policies, codes of conduct, and moderation decisions,
+  often through structured discussion on the instance's local timeline or
+  governance channel. Reflecting the federated, cooperative ethos of the
+  Mastodon project founded by Eugen Rochko.
+source: Mastodon project / fediverse governance tradition
+source_url: https://joinmastodon.org/
+tags: [mastodon, fediverse, governance, federation, online]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Post the proposal publicly
+    description: >-
+      The instance administrator or a member posts a proposal — a policy
+      change, a moderation rule, a federation decision — on the instance's
+      governance channel, with a clear question and a discussion period.
+  - headline: Discuss openly
+    description: >-
+      Members discuss the proposal on the channel for a set period (often a
+      week). Discussion is visible to all members, not held in private
+      backchannels.
+  - headline: Vote
+    description: >-
+      After discussion, a vote is held — often a simple poll with
+      agree/disagree/abstain. The threshold for adoption is set in
+      advance and visible.
+  - headline: Implement and record
+    description: >-
+      The administrator implements the decision and records it in the
+      instance's public governance record, with the vote tally noted.
+  - headline: Federate the outcome
+    description: >-
+      Where the decision affects federation (blocking or allowing other
+      instances), the outcome is communicated so other instance admins can
+      take note.
+outcome: >-
+  Instance policies are decided with member input, recorded publicly, and
+  communicated to the wider federation.
+practice: >-
+  Discussion before voting, not after, is the discipline. A vote without
+  prior discussion is a stamp, not a decision. Record the tally —
+  transparency builds trust in federated spaces.