fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles
All 100 seed YAML files now have: - Filenames that match their id field - IDs that are slugs of their titles - No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs 70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml, moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml, japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
id: hevruta-paired-study
|
||||
title: Hevruta Paired Study
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A Jewish practice of paired text study in which two partners read a text
|
||||
together and argue with and for each other to reach deeper
|
||||
understanding. Originating in the Talmudic tradition of havruta study
|
||||
in yeshivas.
|
||||
source: Jewish textual tradition / Heschel and Hartman Institute
|
||||
source_url: https://hartman.org.il/
|
||||
tags: [jewish, hevruta, study, dialogue, education]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Choose a partner and text
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Two study partners (hevruta) choose a text — often a page of Talmud,
|
||||
a passage of Torah, or a philosophical text — and read it aloud
|
||||
together.
|
||||
- headline: Read closely, aloud
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The partners read the text line by line, aloud, pausing at each
|
||||
difficulty. Reading aloud surfaces what silent reading misses.
|
||||
- headline: Argue with and for
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Each partner argues their reading of a passage, then argues the
|
||||
other's reading charitably — taking the opposing view seriously
|
||||
enough to make it well.
|
||||
- headline: Rest on difficulty
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
When a passage resists resolution, the partners leave the question
|
||||
open rather than forcing closure. The text's difficulty is part of
|
||||
the study.
|
||||
- headline: Summarise what shifted
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
At the close, each partner names one thing they now understand
|
||||
differently than when they began.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
Each partner reaches a deeper understanding than either could alone,
|
||||
through the discipline of arguing with and for each other.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
Hevruta is not debate to win. The discipline of arguing the other's view
|
||||
well is what distinguishes it. Choose a partner who will disagree, not
|
||||
one who will agree.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user