fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles

All 100 seed YAML files now have:
- Filenames that match their id field
- IDs that are slugs of their titles
- No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs

70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml,
moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml,
japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml

seeds/consensus-decision-with-facilitator.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+id: consensus-decision-with-facilitator
+title: Consensus Decision with Facilitator
+description: >-
+  A facilitated consensus process in which a group works toward agreement
+  that everyone can support or at least not block. Common in cooperative and
+  activist organising, drawing on Quaker and collective practice.
+source: Seeds for Change, "Consensus Decision Making"
+source_url: https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus
+tags: [consensus, decision-making, facilitation]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Present the proposal
+    description: >-
+      A proposer summarises the proposal and the need it addresses, then
+      yields to questions of clarification only — not opinions.
+  - headline: Gather concerns
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator invites concerns and reservations, listed visibly
+      without debate. Each concern is a chance to improve the proposal.
+  - headline: Amend and discuss
+    description: >-
+      The group discusses amendments that address concerns, with the
+      facilitator tracking proposals and checking for agreement on each
+      change.
+  - headline: Test for consensus
+    description: >-
+      The facilitator asks whether anyone cannot live with the revised
+      proposal. A block must come with a reasoned explanation and an offer to
+      help find a solution.
+  - headline: Confirm and record
+    description: >-
+      The decision is restated, written down with any reservations noted, and
+      the action steps and responsible parties are confirmed.
+outcome: >-
+  A decision that all participants can support, with dissent engaged rather
+  than overridden.
+practice: >-
+  Distinguish a block from a stand-aside. A block is rare and serious — when
+  blocks recur, revisit the proposal's assumptions or the group's shared aims.