fix: rename seed files and IDs to match cleaned titles

All 100 seed YAML files now have:
- Filenames that match their id field
- IDs that are slugs of their titles
- No cultural identifiers in titles or IDs

70 files renamed. e.g. quaker-meeting-for-worship.yaml -> meeting-for-worship.yaml,
moroccan-jmaa-village.yaml -> jmaa-village-assembly.yaml,
japanese-hansei.yaml -> hansei-reflection.yaml

seeds/citizens-climate-assembly.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+id: citizens-climate-assembly
+title: Citizens' Climate Assembly
+description: >-
+  A deliberative democracy method where a representative sample of a
+  population, chosen by sortition (random selection), is convened to learn
+  about and recommend policy on a complex issue. Used increasingly for
+  climate policy, following models from Ireland, France, and the UK.
+source: newDemocracy Foundation / OECD Innovative Citizen Participation
+source_url: https://www.oecd.org/governance/innovative-citizen-participation/
+tags: [sortition, citizens-assembly, climate, deliberative-democracy]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Select by sortition
+    description: >-
+      A representative sample of the population — typically 60 to 150 people
+      — is selected by random stratified sortition to reflect the
+      demographics of the whole.
+  - headline: Learn from evidence
+    description: >-
+      The assembly hears from experts, stakeholders, and community members
+      across the spectrum of views, with time to question and deliberate.
+  - headline: Deliberate in small groups
+    description: >-
+      Members deliberate in facilitated small groups, working through the
+      trade-offs and values at stake, with facilitators ensuring all speak.
+  - headline: Draft recommendations
+    description: >-
+      The assembly drafts recommendations, voting on each. Recommendations
+      reflect the considered view of the body, including dissent.
+  - headline: Report to the polity
+    description: >-
+      The assembly's recommendations are presented to the sponsoring
+      government or public, with a commitment to respond.
+outcome: >-
+  A representative body of ordinary citizens produces considered
+  recommendations on a complex issue, informed by evidence and deliberation.
+practice: >-
+  The sortition is the legitimacy — it is not a self-selected panel.
+  Quality of facilitation determines whether all voices actually shape the
+  outcome. Government must commit to respond, or the assembly erodes trust.