feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
id: restorative-conference
|
||||
title: Restorative Conference
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A structured meeting bringing together those harmed, those who caused harm,
|
||||
and affected community members to address what happened and what is needed
|
||||
to repair it. Rooted in restorative justice traditions from Maori and
|
||||
Indigenous practices and widely adapted in criminal justice and schools.
|
||||
source: International Institute for Restorative Practices
|
||||
source_url: https://www.iirp.edu/
|
||||
tags: [restorative, justice, repair, conflict]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Prepare participants
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A facilitator meets separately with those harmed, those who caused
|
||||
harm, and supporters of each, to explain the process and confirm
|
||||
willingness to participate.
|
||||
- headline: Tell what happened
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The person who caused harm describes what they did and what they were
|
||||
thinking at the time. Those harmed describe the impact on them.
|
||||
- headline: Identify the harm
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Together the group names who was affected and how — including family,
|
||||
friends, and the wider community.
|
||||
- headline: Build an agreement
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Participants propose what is needed to repair the harm — apologies,
|
||||
restitution, behaviour change, support — and agree on specifics.
|
||||
- headline: Follow up
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A follow-up meeting checks whether the agreement has been kept and
|
||||
whether further repair is needed.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
Those harmed are heard; those who caused harm take responsibility; an
|
||||
agreed repair plan is created and reviewed.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
Preparation is most of the work. Never convene a conference without
|
||||
individual meetings first. The facilitator holds the process, not the
|
||||
outcome.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user