feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
id: radical-candor
|
||||
title: Radical Candor Feedback
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A feedback practice that combines caring personally with challenging
|
||||
directly, avoiding the pitfalls of ruinous empathy and obnoxious
|
||||
aggression. Developed by Kim Scott based on her experience at Google and
|
||||
Apple.
|
||||
source: Kim Scott, "Radical Candor"
|
||||
source_url: https://www.radicalcandor.com/
|
||||
tags: [feedback, workplace, communication, management]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Care personally
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver establishes that they care about the receiver as a person —
|
||||
not just as a performer — through prior relationship and genuine
|
||||
attention.
|
||||
- headline: Challenge directly
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver states the challenge or criticism clearly and specifically,
|
||||
without softening it into vagueness or padding it with praise.
|
||||
- headline: Invite reciprocation
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver invites the receiver to challenge them back, opening the
|
||||
feedback to be two-way rather than hierarchical.
|
||||
- headline: Commit to action
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Both parties agree on what will change and how progress will be
|
||||
checked.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
The receiver hears a clear challenge from someone who demonstrably cares,
|
||||
making the feedback both heard and actionable.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
Without the caring, direct challenge becomes aggression. Without the
|
||||
challenge, caring becomes toothless empathy. Both must be present. Build
|
||||
the relationship before delivering hard feedback.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user