feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
id: quaker-clearness-committee
|
||||
title: Quaker Clearness Committee
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A Quaker practice for discerning a personal decision through a small
|
||||
committee that asks honest questions rather than offering advice. Originating
|
||||
in the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in the 17th century.
|
||||
source: Parker J. Palmer, "A Hidden Wholeness"
|
||||
source_url: https://www.couragerenew.org/clearness-committee/
|
||||
tags: [quaker, discernment, listening, decision-making]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Form the committee
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The focus person invites five or six trusted people to serve as a
|
||||
committee for a two-hour meeting devoted to a specific question or
|
||||
decision they face.
|
||||
- headline: Share the question
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The focus person reads a short written statement describing the issue
|
||||
and the context, without seeking advice.
|
||||
- headline: Ask only questions
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Committee members ask honest, open questions — no advice, no leading
|
||||
questions, no stories from their own life. The focus person may decline
|
||||
to answer any question.
|
||||
- headline: Silence between questions
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
After each question and response, the group sits in silence to let the
|
||||
answer settle before the next question is posed.
|
||||
- headline: Close with reflection
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
In the final twenty minutes the committee offers any observations, and
|
||||
the focus person reflects on what has emerged.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
The focus person gains clarity about their own discernment without being
|
||||
steered by others' opinions or agendas.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
The discipline of questions-only is the hardest part. If someone slips into
|
||||
advice, the clerk gently interrupts. Prepare a written statement in advance;
|
||||
the act of writing often begins the clarity.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user