feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
id: open-agile-roadmap
|
||||
title: Open Agile Roadmap Planning
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A collaborative planning method where a team builds a visual roadmap by
|
||||
placing stories on a timeline together, negotiating dependencies and
|
||||
priorities in real time. Used in Agile and Lean software teams as a
|
||||
alternative to top-down roadmap assignment.
|
||||
source: Agile planning tradition / Mike Cohn, "Agile Estimating and Planning"
|
||||
source_url: https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/
|
||||
tags: [agile, roadmap, planning, collaboration, teams]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Lay out the timeline
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A long wall or board is laid out with a time axis — quarters or
|
||||
months. The team gathers around it with story cards ready.
|
||||
- headline: Place stories together
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Each team member places stories they believe belong on the roadmap,
|
||||
explaining the placement. Others may move them, with discussion.
|
||||
- headline: Negotiate dependencies
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The team draws dependency arrows between stories, surfacing what
|
||||
must come before what. Conflicts are resolved in the open.
|
||||
- headline: Mark priorities and risks
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The team marks the highest-priority stories and the highest-risk
|
||||
ones, so the roadmap shows not only sequence but attention.
|
||||
- headline: Photograph and commit
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The roadmap is photographed and recorded. The team commits to it as
|
||||
a living plan, revisiting it each iteration.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
A shared roadmap that all participants shaped, with dependencies and
|
||||
priorities visible, owned by the team rather than handed down.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
The physical placement is the point — people who place cards themselves
|
||||
commit to them more than those who receive a slide. Revisit it; a
|
||||
roadmap that does not change is not being used.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user