feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
id: japanese-nemawashi
|
||||
title: Japanese Nemawashi Informal Alignment
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A Japanese organisational practice of informally consulting each
|
||||
stakeholder one-on-one before a formal decision meeting, so the meeting
|
||||
confirms rather than surprises. Originating in Japanese corporate and
|
||||
bureaucratic culture, nemawashi (literally "digging around the roots")
|
||||
prepares the ground for consensus.
|
||||
source: Japanese corporate practice / nemawashi tradition
|
||||
source_url: https://www.japanintercultural.com/
|
||||
tags: [japanese, nemawashi, decision-making, consensus, workplace]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Map the stakeholders
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The proposer identifies everyone whose support or non-objection is
|
||||
needed for the decision to hold, including those outside the formal
|
||||
meeting.
|
||||
- headline: Consult each individually
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The proposer meets each stakeholder one-on-one, shares the proposal,
|
||||
and hears their concerns, questions, and suggested changes —
|
||||
before any group meeting.
|
||||
- headline: Revise the proposal
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The proposer revises the proposal in light of what they have heard,
|
||||
incorporating concerns or preparing responses for them.
|
||||
- headline: Confirm in formal meeting
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
When the formal meeting convenes, each stakeholder has already seen
|
||||
the proposal and raised their concerns. The meeting confirms the
|
||||
decision quickly.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
A decision is confirmed in a formal meeting with no surprises, because
|
||||
the real deliberation happened in prior individual conversations.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
Nemawashi is not backroom dealing — it is respect for each person's
|
||||
stake. Skipping it and springing a proposal in a meeting is read as
|
||||
discourtesy, not efficiency.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user