feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
id: feedback-sbi-model
|
||||
title: Situation-Behaviour-Impact Feedback
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A structured feedback method that describes the situation, the observed
|
||||
behaviour, and the impact, avoiding labels and character judgements.
|
||||
Developed by the Center for Creative Leadership.
|
||||
source: Center for Creative Leadership
|
||||
source_url: https://www.ccl.org/
|
||||
tags: [feedback, workplace, communication]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Describe the situation
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver names the specific time and place: "In yesterday's team
|
||||
meeting, when we were reviewing the timeline..."
|
||||
- headline: Describe the behaviour
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver describes what they observed, factually and without
|
||||
interpretation: "...you interrupted Sarah three times while she was
|
||||
presenting the schedule."
|
||||
- headline: Describe the impact
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver describes the effect: "...Sarah went quiet and the team
|
||||
missed her caveats, which showed up later as a missed dependency."
|
||||
- headline: Pause for response
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The giver pauses and invites the receiver's perspective, listening
|
||||
before moving to any suggestion.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
The receiver hears specific, non-judgemental feedback they can act on,
|
||||
without feeling attacked as a person.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
If you cannot name the situation and behaviour specifically, you are not
|
||||
ready to give the feedback. Avoid the verb "always" and the label "you
|
||||
are."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user