feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols

Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures
and practices:

Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer,
Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina,
Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence,
Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa,
Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio,
Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban,
Filipino utari, Ainu practices

Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee,
Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta,
Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning

Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats,
Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen
Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective,
Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning

Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance,
Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance,
Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo

Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing,
Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror,
Appreciative apology repair

Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle,
Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette

Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar

Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols

All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in
descriptions. All YAML files validated.

seeds/delphi-method.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+id: delphi-method
+title: Delphi Method
+description: >-
+  A structured method for gathering expert judgement through rounds of
+  anonymous questionnaires with controlled feedback, used when direct
+  meeting is impractical or would be distorted by dominance. Developed at
+  the RAND Corporation in the 1950s.
+source: RAND Corporation
+source_url: https://www.rand.org/
+tags: [delphi, expert, decision-making, foresight]
+forked_from: null
+image: null
+steps:
+  - headline: Define the question
+    description: >-
+      The coordinators define the question and recruit a panel of experts
+      who will participate across several rounds.
+  - headline: First round questionnaire
+    description: >-
+      Each panellist responds independently and anonymously to the first
+      questionnaire, providing their judgement and reasoning.
+  - headline: Summarise and feed back
+    description: >-
+      The coordinators summarise all responses — including areas of
+      agreement and disagreement — and feed them back to the panel
+      without identifying who said what.
+  - headline: Revise in light of others
+    description: >-
+      Each panellist revises their judgement in light of the summary,
+      optionally explaining why they hold their view against the group.
+  - headline: Iterate to convergence
+    description: >-
+      Rounds continue (typically three or four) until judgement stabilises.
+      The final summary reports the distribution of views, not a forced
+      consensus.
+outcome: >-
+  A reasoned, anonymised convergence of expert judgement that resists the
+  dominance and groupthink of face-to-face meetings.
+practice: >-
+  Anonymity is the engine — without it, the most senior or loudest voice
+  distorts the rest. Do not force consensus; report the spread of
+  judgement honestly.