feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
id: cooperative-sociocracy-circle
|
||||
title: Sociocratic Circle Meeting
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A sociocratic circle meeting where a working group governs its own domain
|
||||
by consent, with a chosen leader and roles, within the larger
|
||||
organisation's circles. Developed in the Netherlands by Gerard Endenburg
|
||||
as Sociocratic Circle-Organisation Method (SCM).
|
||||
source: Sociocracy for All / Endenburg Electrical Engineering
|
||||
source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
|
||||
tags: [sociocracy, circle, consent, cooperative, governance]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Open with round
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The circle opens with a brief round in which each member shares how
|
||||
they are arriving, setting connection before business.
|
||||
- headline: Consent to agenda
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The facilitator proposes an agenda. The circle consents to it —
|
||||
anyone may add an item by raising a reasoned objection.
|
||||
- headline: Work each item by consent
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Each agenda item is worked by consent: presentation, clarifying
|
||||
questions, consent round. Decisions are adopted when no reasoned
|
||||
objection remains.
|
||||
- headline: Review roles and measurements
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The circle periodically reviews its roles (leader, facilitator,
|
||||
secretary) and its measurements, consenting to any changes.
|
||||
- headline: Close with round
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The circle closes with a brief round — one word or sentence from
|
||||
each — and the next meeting is confirmed.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
The circle governs its domain by consent, with all roles and decisions
|
||||
held by the members rather than imposed from above.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
Consent is not consensus — it asks "is this good enough for now, and
|
||||
safe enough to try?" not "do we all agree?" This difference lets the
|
||||
circle move.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user