feat: expand seed library from 6 to 100 protocols
Added 94 new protocol YAML seed files covering diverse global cultures and practices: Indigenous & traditional: Maori powhiri, Aboriginal yarning, Somali xeer, Moroccan jmaa, Tswana kgotla, Zulu imbizo, Peruvian ronda campesina, Ohlone land-back, Inuit IQ consensus, Haudenosaunee condolence, Navajo peacemaking, Ojibwe pipe ceremony, Polynesian talanoa, Rwandan gacaca, West African palaver tree, Mexican tequio, Javanese musyawarah-mufakat, Tibetan story council, Korean yangban, Filipino utari, Ainu practices Religious communities: Quaker meeting for business, clearness committee, Amish shunning (Meidung), Mennonite discernment, Jewish hevruta, Rastafari nyabinghi reasoning Facilitation: World Cafe, Open Space, Future Search, Six Thinking Hats, Dynamic Facilitation, Socratic Seminar, Delphi method, Copenhagen Consensus, Lean Coffee, Hackathon sprint, Agile retrospective, Stand-up meeting, Pair programming, Roadmap planning Governance: Sociocratic consent selection, Dynamic self-governance, Cooperative consensus, Hackerspace consensus, Mastodon governance, Climate assemblies (x2), Basque asamblearismo Conflict & repair: Restorative conference, circle sentencing, Nonviolent Communication (3 protocols), Active listening mirror, Appreciative apology repair Community & care: Community kitchen, Gratefulness circle, Passing circle, Paired walking, Deep listening dyad, Mutual aid, Permaculture charrette Education: Barefoot College night school, Socratic seminar Everyday: Various greeting, transition, and gratitude protocols All protocols credit original sources. Cultural context noted in descriptions. All YAML files validated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
id: cooperative-consent-round
|
||||
title: Cooperative Consent Round
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A decision method where each member in turn states consent, stand-aside,
|
||||
or objection to a proposal, so the decision is recorded with all
|
||||
positions visible. Used in worker cooperatives and sociocratic
|
||||
organisations.
|
||||
source: Sociocracy for All / worker cooperative tradition
|
||||
source_url: https://www.sociocracyforall.org/
|
||||
tags: [consent, cooperative, decision-making, governance]
|
||||
forked_from: null
|
||||
image: null
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- headline: Present the proposal
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The proposer presents the proposal and answers clarifying questions
|
||||
only. No opinions are offered yet.
|
||||
- headline: Open for reaction
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The facilitator opens a brief round of reactions to surface concerns,
|
||||
without yet seeking resolution. Concerns are listed visibly.
|
||||
- headline: Amend to address concerns
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
The proposer amends the proposal to address concerns that have been
|
||||
raised, stating each change explicitly.
|
||||
- headline: Consent round
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Each member in turn states one of: consent (no reasoned objection),
|
||||
stand-aside (I won't help but won't block), or objection (a specific
|
||||
reason this would cause harm).
|
||||
- headline: Address objections or withdraw
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Objections are addressed by further amendment. If an objection cannot
|
||||
be resolved, the proposal is withdrawn or held.
|
||||
outcome: >-
|
||||
A decision is adopted with every member's position recorded, including
|
||||
stand-asides; no one is silently carried along.
|
||||
practice: >-
|
||||
The consent round is the key step — it surfaces the silent dissenter.
|
||||
Stand-aside is not a block; it is a recorded non-participation. Objections
|
||||
must be reasoned and specific.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user